Bulletin N° 1006
“Plandemic II:
Indoctornation”
August 2020
https://www.thriveon.com/media/plandemic-ii-indoctornation-full-movie
(1:15:30)
This sequel to the historic Judy Mikovitz
interview lays bare the corrupt and dangerous machinations behind Covid and the
mandatory vaccine through the expert eyes of Dr. David Martin.
Guided by the meticulous work of Dr. David E.
Martin, Plandemic
II: Indoctornation, tracks a
three decade-long money trail that leads directly to the key players behind the
COVID 19 pandemic.
+
“The
Plandemic Series”
-with
Mikki Willis and Judy Mikovits
(1:15:30)
This sequel to the historic Judy Mikovitz
interview lays bare the corrupt and dangerous machinations behind Covid and the
mandatory vaccine through the expert eyes of Dr. David Martin.
Guided by the meticulous work of Dr. David E.
Martin, Plandemic II: Indoctornation, tracks a three decade-long money trail
that leads directly to the key players behind the COVID 19 pandemic.
+
“The
‘Plandemic’ and the Great Awakening: An Interview”
with Dr. Joseph Mercola and Mikki Willis
(1:19:54)
Story at-a-glance
Subject: Old attitudes, new altitudes: the “L” word and Neoconservative Dictatorship.
Grenoble, October 23,
2021
Dear Colleagues and Friends of
CEIMSA,
The lure of
dictatorship is a constant in the history of mankind. Over the past one hundred
years, humans have experienced the consequences of extreme consolidation of
power in the hands of a few. Stalin’s “Gulag,” Hitler’s “Concentration Camps,”
Mao’s “Great Leap Forward,’ and now Klaus Schwab’s “Great Reset” are just a few
examples of the great damage such monopolies of power can inflict. To be sure
political power like this is not in the hands of one individual, but is rather a
carefully cultivated mindset; it represents a virtual catharsis for those who
choose to no longer think for themselves and instead gladly submit to the
oceanic feeling of belonging to some metaphysical whole. This, social scientists have suggested, is
the human condition. However, most agree that this obtuse abdication of
responsibility cannot last forever - no matter how lofty the ideals it professes
to uphold, nor how strong the bonds created by existential fear and conspicuous obedience appear to be.
Returning to Barrington Moore, Jr’s radical history of Injustice: The Social Bases of Obedience and Revolt (1978), we now look at Part Three of this research, which is entitled “General Perspectives.” In his preface, Moore spells out what he intends to accomplish in the last chapters of his book:
Part Three constitutes a return to the general issues raised in Part One, together with an attempt to cope with both the methodological and substantive issues that came to light through the introduction of an historical perspective. The shift to a higher level of generality is deliberately gradual. Chapter Ten investigates selected aspects of the Russian revolutions in 1917 to explain significant differences and similarities in the behavior of German and Russian workers in the crises that came at the end of the First World War. At this point the analysis raises the general question of suppressed historical alternatives by trying to discern what other possibilities were open in the German context of defeat and revolutionary turmoil between 1918 and 1920. Chapter Twelve uses National Socialism as an extreme example of repressive and aggressive tendencies in popular or mass conceptions of injustice, in an effort to analyze and comprehend the more general causes of these trends. Finally, the last three chapters, including the Epilogue, try to come to terms with the twin issues of moral relativism, or the denial of any generally valid conception of injustice, and how people come to perceive and struggle against injustice. This part of the discussion draws on evidence and theoretical considerations that have emerged so far in this book and also on whatever additional intellectual resources I could bring to bear.
Without concealing my own moral preferences or the reasons for them, I have tried throughout to construct arguments that would be open to refutation through an appeal to evidence and logic. About the intellectual position that governs the work as a whole it is enough to say here that I am as skeptical about catastrophe as the inevitable human fate as I am about utopia, and even more skeptical about catastrophe as the necessary prelude to utopia.(pp.xvi-xvii)
Moore begins the
final section of this book with a declaration of his intentions, to proceed
from concrete historical events to abstract theory, and thereby refute orthodox
Marxist doctrine, as he knows it (i.e. in 1848 and subsequently there existed
no revolutionary industrial working class in Europe that could effectively
challenge the capitalist system of labor exploitation and institute a new
socialist political economy).
With the collapse and suppression of the revolt in the Ruhr, we have reached the end of our history of German workers, though for the next two chapters we shall continue drawing on German social history in order to analyze major theoretical issues. The ascent toward ‘pure’ theory will be gradual. Remaining within the context of German history, the next two chapters will discuss how it might be possible to ascertain objectively the existence of a liberating historical alternative and assess moral responsibility for its suppression, and the distinctions as well as similarities between liberating and repressive forms of popular moral anger. From there we can proceed to more general issues of moral relativism, rational and irrational forms of authority, and the ways in which inevitable evils can be culturally redefined as intolerable abuses. At the present juncture we have just observed some of the reasons for the failure of the most important radical thrust to date that was based on the industrial workers in an advanced industrial country. But what is the meaning of this failure? Do not the Russian revolutions of 1905 and 1917 vindicate the conception of a proletarian revolution, even if in a sense quite different from that originally envisaged by Marx?
If by proletarian revolution one means a revolution based primarily on the industrial workers, the answer to this question, as I read the evidence, remains negative. To be sure, in all three of the Russian revolutions (in 1905, and in February and October, 1917) the industrial workers in the big cities did play a significant and perhaps even indispensable role. Furthermore a party that claimed to speak to what was by November, 1917, a thoroughly radicalized majority of these workers did take and keep power. Nevertheless there were much more important reasons for the revolutionary transformation. These were (1) peasant rebellions and land seizures in a country whose population was still 80 percent peasant and hostile to existing property relationships; (2) the alienation and dismay by 1917 of nearly all influential sectors of the population in the face of Tsarist incompetence and weakness as revealed by the strains of the war; and finally (3) the disintegration under these stains of the main instruments of repression, the army, and the police forces. This disintegration was decisive. It was not the power of the revolutionary explosion that brought down the Tsarist edifice. It was the collapse of its defenders. Both in February (March by the new calendar) and October (November), 1917, the revolutionaries merely trampled through an open door rotting crazily on its hinges. That is the reason there was so little bloodshed in the revolutions themselves. Bloodshed came later with a vengeance, as the ‘dictatorship of the proletariat’ struggled to establish itself as a minority elite based in the cities, endeavoring to rule and then transform a peasant society.
All this was, of course, very different from what took place in Germany. Rather than engage in further debate about whether the concept of proletarian revolution does or does not fit Russian revolutionary experience, it will be more profitable to ascertain some of the reasons why the Russian workers behaved as they did and to assess somewhat more closely their actual role in the revolutionary process.
The Russian industrial working class grew up in an historical setting very different from its German counterpart. The Tsarist bureaucracy was a decisive element, perhaps the decisive element in this setting. Its policies heavily influenced the rate and character of Russian industrial growth. Tsarist policies were also in great measure responsible for the radicalization of Russian industrial workers prior to 1914, though other forces were also at work that in time might possibly have led to results closer to the degree of integration apparent in Germany. Tsarist policies were again heavily responsible for the disintegration of Russian military and police forces. After the February revolution the Provisional Government was unwilling or unable to reverse the process of disintegration and find for itself a new social base.
In both their social composition and institutions the Russian industrial workers were also a very recent historical creation, the consequence of Russia’s rapid industrial growth before the First World War. . . . In sharp contrast to Germany a very large proportion of these workers, nearly 50 percent by 1902, were employed in giant establishments of 1,000 and more workers.(pp.357-359)
After a detail
discussion of Russian political history in 1917, describing the differences
between the Bolsheviks who were vying for revolutionary leadership and the
Russian workers who were increasingly in revolt against Tsarist state policies,
Moore returns to the strange chemistry of revolutionary change.
I have dwelt on these aspects of the February upheaval in some detail because they shed important light on some general revolutionary processes. The decay of obedience among the soldiers was the crucial aspect of the revolt. Until decay overtakes the apparatus of repression no revolutionary movement stands a chance. In the case of the Petrograd garrison the record allows us to discern once again the decisive role of social support in disobedience as well as some of the classic obstacles to the break with legitimate authority. On the side of the revolutionaries the grievances of the industrial workers did play a part. But the workers were quite hard to bring the proper pitch of revolutionary heat and convert into a revolutionary crowd – by itself helpless against resolute armed force as one episode showed – until and unless the factories themselves were shut. Working conditions, as bad as they undoubtedly were, evidently remained insufficient to produce this effect as long as the workers were in the social setting of on going concern. Inside shut-down factories, on the other hand, with the workers still all crowded together, agitators were able to get results. It is a sage guess that more peaceably inclined and ‘responsible’ workers – and there must have been some though far fewer in the Russian setting than in the German – were overwhelmed by their more excitable colleagues, and to some extent dragged and bullied into joining the revolutionary crowd. Rather than the specific discontents of the workers, the whole collapse of ordinary daily routines on account of consumer shortages, in turn traceable to the breakdown of the transportation system, was the factor that created a specifically revolutionary atmosphere. In this connection the role of the women in both leading the first stages of the revolt and in effect disarming the forces of repression comes strikingly to the fore – and not for the first time in a revolutionary upheaval.
From the February Revolution onward the rest of the story is epilogue, as least from the standpoint of a comparison with Germany. Unlike Germany, Russian society, for reasons already discussed, had failed to generate a moderate labor movement to whom power could be transferred. The peasants were a source of increasing revolutionary agitation instead of a brake on the revolutionary process, and the Russian capitalist bourgeoisie was far weaker than its German counterpart. Thus the process of radicalization could continue to destroy the existing set of social relationships until a resolute party was able and willing to take power and attempt the tremendous task of revolutionary reconstruction. More factories would shut down due to worse shortages. The army would disintegrate into a nearly helpless mass.
Two aspects of this process, however, still deserve our attention. What sort of demands did the workers themselves put forth in this process? The end of Tsarist controls provide a unique opportunity to gain some insight into the mentality of ordinary workers and their perceptions of what was taking place around them. The other question of general interest is this: what was the role of revolutionary planning and organization in the Bolshevik seizure of power? The February (March) Revolution was, as even Soviet authorities are now able to recognize, a spontaneous and unplanned affair. How different was the next one? Could it be that all that has been written in the East and the West on the importance of the revolutionary party and organization, using this event as an archetype, is mainly an exercise in social mythology?
The best information about what the workers themselves wanted comes from the statements of the committees that sprang up in individual factories immediately after the February revolution. Apparently the workers organized these committees to a great extent on their own, though Menshevik and Social Revolutionary agitators contributed. At first there were few if any Bolsheviks. Starting in Petrograd immediately after the February revolution the factory committee spread swiftly to every industrial center of European Russia. Even if they were undoubtedly dominated by the articulate and politically advanced – circumstances soon led to their domination by the Bolsheviks – the committees were in close touch with the workers and especially at fist, reflected their spontaneous desires and feelings. Fortunately the French historian Marc Ferro provided a useful summary of a large number of their requests and communications, which poured in from all over Russia.
Nearly all the demands that surfaced with the end of Tsarism had to do with wages and working conditions. Far and away the most popular one was for the eight-hour day. There was wide-spread opposition to piecework. Instead they wanted to be paid by the day, with wages to be paid once a week and two week’s pay in case of dismissal. Like the German workers they were not at all egalitarian. They had definite ideas about the rates of pay appropriate for different levels of skill. Again like the German workers they wanted a floor under wages in the form of a definite minimum. Requests for raises began after the end of March, but were mainly due to inflation. In some respects the Russians were ahead of German workers in asking for the abolition of child labor and the end of discrimination by sex.
As to conditions in the workplace there was the equivalent of the German demand for decent human treatment: management should be polite to the workers. From several places there were objections to arbitrary deductions from wages in the form of fines. Other demands were very simple and concrete: that management should supply boiling water for meals, install canteen and toilet facilities, and supply tools instead of making workers supply their own.
On political issues the workers were at fist diffident and divided about continuing the war. Support for the new Provisional Government was reluctant at best. The workers perceived the fall of Nicholas II as settling the issue of the general form of government, which was to be some sort of a republic.
. . .
In general the whole thrust of these demands, as Marc Ferro observes, was to improve working conditions, not to change them. Once again we see that the workers’ idea of a good society – an idea by no means confined to workers – is the present order with its most disagreeable feathers softened or eliminated. But in the characteristic euphoria of a revolution’s fist phase, when everything suddenly seems within reach and the aura of inevitability has suddenly evaporated, the Russian workers were hardly in a mood to wait. Their demands were limited and concrete. But they had to be met, completely and without delay. In the prevailing circumstances of chaos and destruction, disappointment and further radicalization were more than likely.(pp.367-370)
After a careful
examination of the actual historical context, Moore suggests that Lenin’s
“vanguard political party,” which was supposed to “telescope” the historical
revolutionary forces by replacing class-conscious proletariat with professional
revolutionaries as a decisive factor creating the socialist society was a myth,
not withstanding their claims to “discipline” and outstanding “organizational
skills.”
Meanwhile the Bolsheviks were the only party overtly committed to a socialist revolution. Well before October they had won widespread influence among the workers. Furthermore they prided themselves on their discipline and organization, their capacity to lead and orchestrate a revolution whenever a favorable situation, might occur. The situation was favorable, and we know they succeeded. But how important to their success was their vaunted capacity of organization?
If one looks carefully at the sequence of events, one can only conclude that this capacity played only a minimal role if indeed it played any at all. Even Lenin’s personal role was limited to forcing a decision to attempt insurrection on a somewhat reluctant leadership, who departed from his strategy on crucial points. During an important part of the insurrection he was completely out of touch with those who were leading it. In short the organizational weapons at this juncture was mainly a myth.
So far as it can be measured, the movement of opinion in the big cities favored the Bolsheviks. By the summer of 1917 the Bolsheviks had outpaced the Mensheviks and become the first party. In September the Bolsheviks won a majority in the Petrograd soviet. Shortly afterward Trotsky became its chairman. In Moscow elections to ward councils showed a startling rise from 11 to 51 percent between July and October for the Bolsheviks, while the Mensheviks dropped from 12 to 4 percent.
By the end of July, that is even before the upsurge in Bolshevik strength had become apparent. Lenin had concluded that the Bolshevik Party must take power by force. At this time he discarded the soviets as organs for the attainment of proletarian power, mainly because the Petrograd soviet had recently supported reprisals against the Bolsheviks for the premature and apparently spontaneous uprising earlier that month. From this point on, through the successful October (November 7) uprising Lenin was to maintain an attitude of hostile impatience toward the soviets, arguing repeatedly that it was the task of the Bolsheviks to take power as the vanguard of the proletariat. Presented with the fact of a successful proletarian takeover, Lenin insisted, the soviets would happily endorse and support the vanguard. Perhaps fortunately for the Bolshevik cause, Trotsky, who played a more active role in making concrete decisions during the course of the uprising, followed a different policy of trying to make the insurrection appear as a defensive of the soviets against reactionary plans. Though the differences between such out leaders as Lenin and Trotsky hardly confirmed the notion of a monolithic and disciplined revolutionary organization, at least they appear to have helped the Bolsheviks attain their goal. That was not true of other disputes within the top leadership. (pp.371-373)
Moore ends his
comparison of Russian and German working class history in Chapter Ten with an
assessment of the significant forces at play in the revolutionary periods of
the two countries.
To conclude, the industrial workers did in Russia provide a major urban base for the victory of the revolutionary forces. That is true even though the workers were in many places but a minority of the urban population. In Moscow, where they were a minority, about a quarter of the city’s population, there was a brief and bloody battle at the time of the Bolshevik uprising.) If the urban enemies of the revolution had been able to unite and organize themselves, they might have defeated or crushed the revolution the cities. But at some point they would have had to come to terms with the peasant revolution. The same is true the other way around. Subsequent revolutionary experience in China, Vietnam, and Cuba shows that a revolution with its main social base in the countryside cannot impose a revolutionary policy on the whole society until and unless it can gain control of the cities, something it may have to do with an army rather than a revolutionary party. It is the state of the army, of competing armies, not of the working class, that has determined the fate of the twentieth-century revolutions. (p.375)
In the next CEIMSA
bulletin we will conclude our presentation of Barrington Moore Jr’s historical
research into the social bases of obedience and revolt with a look at the
repressive aspects of moral outrage, “the forms and sources of Nazi moral outrage.”
The 21 +
items below provide information and analysis which stimulate critical
thinking on the issues of today, at this historical moment of debacle, when the
entire political system of capitalist democracies is endangered by the
concentration of power in the hands of a few, with a general apathy on the part
of many who are caught in their own patterns of reactive behavior to the aggressive and
incoherent initiatives of our would-be rulers. In the absence of a
“revolutionary vanguard party” – whether capitalist or socialist - we are
forced to turn to ourselves (“we are the ones we’ve been waiting for”), and, as
has been suggested in the reading above, this is not the first time in history
that promoting new alternatives of democratic self-reliance has appeared as the only viable solution to the looming destruction of
society.
Sincerely,
Francis McCollum Feeley
--
Professeur
honoraire de l'Université Grenoble-Alpes
Ancien Directeur des Researches
Université de Paris-Nanterre
Director of The Center for the Advanced Study
of American Institutions and Social Movements
(CEIMSA-in-Exile)
The University of California-San Diego
http://www.ceimsa.org
a.
The COVID-19 RT-PCR Test: How to Mislead All Humanity.
Using
a "Test" To Lock Down Society
by Dr. Pascal Sacré
Introduction: using a technique to lock down society
All current propaganda on the COVID-19 pandemic is based on an
assumption that is considered obvious, true and no longer questioned:
Positive RT-PCR test
means being sick with COVID. This assumption is misleading.
Very few people,
including doctors, understand how a PCR test works.
RT-PCR means Real
Time-Polymerase Chain Reaction.
In French, it means:
Réaction de Polymérisation en Chaîne en Temps Réel.
In medicine, we use
this tool mainly to diagnose a viral infection.
Starting from a
clinical situation with the presence or absence of particular symptoms in a
patient, we consider different diagnoses based on tests.
In the case of
certain infections, particularly viral infections, we use the RT-PCR technique
to confirm a diagnostic hypothesis suggested by a clinical picture.
We do not routinely
perform RT-PCR on any patient who is overheated, coughing or has an
inflammatory syndrome!
It is a laboratory,
molecular biology technique of gene amplification because it looks for gene
traces (DNA or RNA) by amplifying them.
In addition to
medicine, other fields of application are genetics, research, industry and
forensics.
The technique is
carried out in a specialized laboratory, it cannot be done in any laboratory,
even a hospital. This entails a certain cost, and a delay sometimes of several
days between the sample and the result.
+
Our
Future vs. Neoliberalism
http://www.informationclearinghouse.info/56812.htm
by Medea Benjimin
+
Increases in COVID-19 are unrelated to levels of vaccination
across 68 countries and 2947
counties in the United States
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8481107/
by S. V. Subramanian and Akhil Kumar
+
Covid SURGES Among Most Vaxxed Communities Says
Harvard Study
with Jimmy
Dore
(13:51)
+
The
Bystander Effect
with James Corbett
(34:01)
===========
b.
Robert F. Kennedy Jr - Times Square Rally for Freedom
Full Speech - 10/16/2021
https://www.bitchute.com/video/e68xb0APkSoU/
(34 :50)
+
Republican
AGs Say
There
Is No Federal Vaccine Mandate for Private Workers, Vow to Sue
by Jack Phillips
===========
c.
House Intelligence Committee Seeks Answers from CIA on Plot
Against Assange
http://www.informationclearinghouse.info/56817.htm
by Joe Lauria
===========
d.
“But What About Deagel?”
https://www.corbettreport.com/qfc080-deagel/
with James
Corbett
(40:14)
+
60+ Ivermectin Lawsuits as Courts Become Battlefield:
Hospital Administrations Against Patients
At least 14 lawsuits are ongoing in the State of New York alone to
compel hospitals in that state to administer ivermectin to severely ill
COVID-19 patients. A total of 60 lawsuits involving demands for ivermectin as a
treatment for COVID-19 have been handled by one law firm alone. TrialSite has
followed many of these lawsuits, including an interview with the
partner of a leading law firm leading the legal charge—the Law Office of Ralph
Lorigo. While federal regulators don’t recommend off-label use of the U.S. Food
and Drug Administration (FDA) approved antiparasitic drug, that doesn’t
translate to a legal ban on physicians doing so. Traditionally, physicians had
the discretion to take an off-label drug and, if in their best professional
judgment and assuming appropriate disclosure and approval by the patient,
prescribe off-label to address a particular problem. However, with a concerted
effort to tarnish the name of this drug used by billions primarily in low-and
middle-income countries (LMICs) over the last four decades—with very few safety
issues—a concerted peer pressure to stop doctors and pharmacies from
prescribing also leads to hospitals refusing to use the ...
+
From: News from Underground
[mailto:nobody@simplelists.com]
Sent: Thursday, October 21, 2021
Subject: Daily digest for nfu@simplelists.com
1) New
Zealand is committing suicide: A doctor writes "in stupefied
disbelief" at what the government is doing to "fight COVID" - Mark Crispin
Miller (20 Oct 2021 12:48 EDT) |
||
2) The
smear campaign against Prof. David Miller, at/by the University of Bristol,
is only one example of an all-pervasive rot - Mark Crispin Miller (20 Oct 2021 16:20
EDT) |
||
3) Four
parasites found in vials of Pfizer and Moderna "vaccines" (and both
companies have been SILENT on the matter, and so has "our free
press") - Mark
Crispin Miller (20 Oct 2021 16:33 EDT) |
||
4) Dutch
undertaker tells what he has seen in bodies of the "vaccinated"
dead - Mark
Crispin Miller (20 Oct 2021 16:35 EDT) |
||
|
||
5)One-third
of hiring managers toss out resumes without "vaccination" status - Mark Crispin
Miller (20 Oct 2021 17:33 EDT) |
1)
New
Zealand is committing suicide: A doctor writes "in stupefied
disbelief" at what the government is doing to "fight COVID" by Mark Crispin Miller (20 Oct 2021 12:48 EDT)
Reply to list
From
Dr. Emanuel E. Garcia:
To:
Prime Minister Ardern
As
a physician and New Zealand citizen, I am writing in stupefied disbelief at the
enormously damaging COVID policies you and your government have pursued
and are continuing to pursue. I will disregard the hubris of your
contention that your Ministry of Health is the 'single source of
truth' about COVID matters, but will instead focus on several facts.
1.
the elimination of a respiratory coronavirus is not possible -- as you are now
grudgingly admitting
2.
relying on 'vaccines' such as the Pfizer mRNA injection -- agents
that neither prevent infection nor transmission and that have resulted in
enormous numbers of deaths and adverse events worldwide -- is foolhardy
3.
neglecting to encourage and pursue preventative measures and EARLY TREATMENT of
COVID is incomprehensible
One
would think that during what has been billed as the most lethal pandemic in
human history the energies and enthusiasm and intelligence of Medicine and
health policy would be directed towards prevention and treatment. Highly
effective and evolving protocols are already in use in
other parts of the world (see https://covid19criticalcare.com/covid-19-protocols/).
How
can you explain the suppression and ignorance of such treatment? How can
you explain policies that are geared towards blackmailing the populace into
accepting inoculations when in fact efficacious treatments are available?
How can you explain the vast ignorance of primary health practitioners about early
treatment? This omission is, in my considered opinion, nothing less than
criminal.
New
Zealand now finds itself in disarray. Disastrous lockdowns, the imposition of
mask-wearing and distancing, none of which is based in science, are destroying
human commerce and human freedom, and are conditioning us to expect the
disappearance of human intimacy, love and joy in favour of endless fear
and anxiety.
I
sincerely hope you will reflect upon your decisions and look towards those true
experts such as Dr. Peter McCullough and others for guidance out of this
horrifying mess.
https://earlycovidcare.org/naturalimmunity/
Sincerely,
Emanuel
E. Garcia, MD
Eastbourne,
New Zealand
19
October 2021
2)
The smear
campaign against Prof. David Miller, at/by the University of Bristol, is only
one example of an all-pervasive rot by Mark Crispin Miller (20 Oct 2021 16:20 EDT)
Reply to list
Oct
19, 2021
Propaganda,
Character Assassination & the Campaign Against Prof David Miller
Dr
Piers Robinson
On
October 1st 2021, the University of Bristol decided to buckle in the face of a
near 3 year-long pro-Israel lobby campaign and fire Professor David Miller.
I have
worked with David for many years now, co-published
work on the theory of propaganda, researched and written about the UK FCO
propaganda operation (ongoing) that has sought to overthrow the Syrian
government, and developed the fledgling Organisation for Propaganda Studies.
David was, is, and will continue to be, a major intellectual force with respect to our understanding of propaganda, and his integrity, particularly in relation to the Israel-Palestine issue, is now cemented in history. He became a voice for the Palestinians, highlighting the ways in which propaganda has worked in order to simultaneously suppress public understanding of the nefarious actions of the Israeli government against them and erase awareness of their plight.
Inevitably and predictably he became an essential target for the pro-Israel lobby and the implementation of a remarkably sustained and aggressive campaign designed to falsely smear him as ‘anti-Semitic’ and have him fired.
I also have a relationship with the University of Bristol. I studied for my MSc in International Relations back in 1996-97 (funded by the Economic and Social Research Council [ESRC]) and continued in 1997 to undertake a PhD (also ESRC funded) under the supervision of Professor Eric Herring. I left at the end of the 2nd year of the PhD to take up my first full-time academic post at the University of Liverpool, School of Politics and Communication Studies. My PhD was awarded in 2000 from the University of Bristol.
Smear campaigns and character assassination are a core feature of contemporary propaganda and our ‘democratic’ landscape. There is even an academic Handbook on the tactic, titled The Routledge Handbook of Character Assassination and Reputation Management, whilst US investigative journalist Sharyl Atkinson has provided a powerful account detailing how legitimate political views are stifled through nefarious attempts to destroy reputations.
I have witnessed this tactic first hand through my experience researching propaganda and the war on Syria.
For the ‘thought crime’ of questioning and researching UK government-linked ‘influence operations’ in that war, in particular the controversy over the OPCW (Organisation for the Prohibition of Chemical Weapons) and the alleged chemical weapon attack in Douma 2018, myself and other colleagues (including David), have been subjected to aggressive and continuous smearing some of which is documented here.
Even when OPCW whistleblower scientists emerged and corroborated what we had been saying, those attacking us have simply continued with accusations of our being ‘conspiracy theorists’, ‘war crime deniers’ and agents of ‘disinformation’. That smear campaign also now incorporates OPCW whistleblowers with attempts to blacken their reputations.
What we see today is not completely new and David’s experience is not an isolated one.
In an earlier era, scientists such as Professor Steven Jones were smeared and pushed from their positions when raising perfectly objective, evidence-based and rational questions regarding 9/11. Chemist and laboratory director Kevin Ryan was fired for blowing the whistle on his own company which had obfuscated evidence related to the building collapses that occurred on 9/11.
To this day, and as Dr David Hughes has recently detailed in an academic journal, mainstream academia continues to self-censor and avoid substantial analysis of 9/11.
Today, with Covid-19, we now appear to be seeing an unprecedented level of attacks on academics who have raised what are, again, perfectly objective, evidence-based and rational questions regarding the efficacy of lockdowns and the drive toward coerced/mandated injections.
High profile and leading academics such as Sunetra Gupta (University of Oxford) and even Professor Robert Malone, inventor of mRNA technology used in the current Covid-19 injection, have had to battle concerted drives to discredit them, with, for example, Gupta being accused of being a ‘conspiracy theorist’.
Professor Sucharit Bhakdi, an early critic of lockdown, has been accused of anti-Semitism in what appears to be a wildly ill-founded and crude attempt to discredit his expertise.
Click
on the link for the rest.
3)
Four
parasites found in vials of Pfizer and Moderna "vaccines" (and both
companies have been SILENT on the matter, and so has "our free
press") by Mark Crispin Miller (20 Oct 2021 16:33 EDT)
Reply to list
From
Lila York:
Trypanosoma
Cruzi
https://odysee.com/@RamolaDReports:8/News-Report----Parasites-Found-in-COVID-19-Vaccines:1
Now
we know why they are banning ivermectin.
Sent
with ProtonMail Secure Email.
4)
Dutch undertaker
tells what he has seen in bodies of the "vaccinated" dead by Mark Crispin Miller (20 Oct 2021 16:35 EDT)
Reply to list
The
original Dutch as Englished by Google Translate:
Bleeding,
very small bleeding in a deceased person. I come across them more and more
often and notice that my work to be performed is shifting as a result and I
have to get more and more out of the closet to make these deceased presentable.
We call them petechiae. Small point-shaped hemorrhages that have entered our
vascular system, so that they can no longer be suppressed. Over the past six months
I suddenly come across deceased weekly with this unpleasant discoloration in
the face, shoulders and upper arms. The deceased is purple/blue on the face
(not printable) and blue/black on the neck and shoulders. The oxygen-poor blood
I take from this deceased (to replace with chemicals with dye) is viscous dark
blue to black (no exaggeration). Are there colleagues who recognize this and
can tell me what causes this? I think I have enough experience to recognize
that we encountered this less often before (for me from 4 per year, to 2 per
week). Please ask in a PM Update 10-10-2021 My question above is intended to be
neutral with the aim of being able to perform my work better. Through all kinds
of channels I am told that even on Twitter (not used by me) reactions are
posted, which are not intended to help me and thus the relatives. A response is
fine, but please focus on my question and not on speculation. Someone who knows
me knows (certainly after reading my book) how serious I am in my profession, I
would like to keep this name [secret]. Thank you!
5)
One-third
of hiring managers toss out resumes without "vaccination" status by Mark Crispin Miller (20 Oct 2021 17:33 EDT)
Reply to list
More
accomplices.
From
Anders Fahey:
Greetings
Friends,
As
many of you know I recently resigned from my job (where I have been employed
for 7 year) as a result of my company adding a covid vax mandate as a condition
of employment.
I
just wanted to pass along this article as I think we should all be aware of
this insidious new trick some companies have adopted to filter out
"unclean" applicants like myself.
The
response to the job applications I've submitted thus far has been *crickets*,
and although there are many contributing factors as to why that may be, I'm
starting to suspect my refusal to add a vax status line to my resume
is one of them.
If so,
yikes 😳
Warmly,
Anders
---
Support News from Underground: https://bit.ly/NFUSupport
Visit News from Underground: https://markcrispinmiller.com
For archives, please go to: https://archives.simplelists.com/nfu
+
COVID
Vaccine Protocol:
What
to Do If You're Forced to Get a COVID Vaccine
https://meganredshaw.substack.com/p/covid-vaccine-protocol-what-to-do
by Megan Redshaw
Dr. Russell
Blaylock's exclusive protocol to help prevent COVID vaccine side-effects and
combat the effects of
these experimental
vaccines on your body.
A few years ago I came across a protocol by Dr. Russell
Blaylock, M.D., called “What to Do if Force Vaccinated,” so I reached out to him to see if he had a COVID 2.0
version specific to people who are required to get a COVID quackxine.
Dr. Blaylock was not only known for being an amazing
neurosurgeon, he’s a lecturer, author, founder of Theoretical Neuroscience
Research, LLC and Associate Editor of the Neuroinflammation section of Surgical
Neurology International. (He also writes The Blaylock Wellness Report, which I highly recommend subscribing to.)
===========
e.
From: Les Mutins de Pangée
[mailto:contact@lesmutins.org]
Sent: Saturday, October 16, 2021
Subject: Hacking Justice - Julian Assange au cinéma
C'était inattendu il y a quelques semaines seulement, le film sortira au cinéma à Paris puis dans d'autres salles à la demande... |
|
===========
f.
From: Children's Health Defense
[mailto:team@childrenshealthdefense.org]
Sent: Sunday, October 17, 2021 5:07 PM
Subject: Most Read News of the Week
|
+
The
COVID-19 scandal Tucker Carlson doesn’t want you to know about
with Jaisal Noor
(5:00)
Fox News host Tucker Carlson has embraced COVID-19
conspiracy theories that obscure the real scandal of the pandemic: Wealthy
countries continue to hoard vaccines and block the release of patents, all but
guaranteeing astronomical profits for vaccine makers as the virus spreads.
===========
g.
“On The Pandora Papers and Libertarian Lies”
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Txe790gOmQU
with Julianna
Forlano and Richard Wolff
(29:47)
+
Global Financial Empire 1
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=4THv2qQjLhc
with Michael Hudson
(1:48:01)
+
Was America’s Longest War for Opium,
Oil
and Propping up the Stock Market?
by John
Potash
+
You
Think Inflation Fears Are Overhyped? Think Again
https://www.zerohedge.com/markets/you-think-inflation-fears-are-overhyped-think-again
by Mark Cudmore
===========
h.
Russian warships unleash massive response
near Japan
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=tQQafqGo7S4
with Alex Mihailovich and Peter Kuznick
(24:23)
Japan is currently engaged in a number of territorial
disputes, with neighboring countries including China, North Korea, South Korea
and Russia. Russia has rejected a territorial claim by Japan and conducted
military drills wherein Russia’s Pacific Fleet intercepted ten missiles as it
deployed it’s highly sophisticated surface to air missile defense system. The
disputed islands were seized by Soviet forces in the last days of World War II
from the Axis-aligned Empire of Japan and been in Russian hands ever since.
Russia has developed the islands with military infrastructure, including missile
systems. RT’s Alex Mihailovich has the story. Then Peter Kuznick of American
University shares his expertise. He points out that Japan is becoming
increasingly hostile toward Russia and China as it draws closer to the US.
Plus, Sourabh Gupta of the China-America Institute joins Rick Sanchez to weigh
in on the the recent US nuclear submarine crash in the South China Sea, through
the lens of new revelations that the US Navy was conducting hydrographic
studies of the area to prepare for the eventuality of submarine warfare with
China.
+
How bad is the political situation in
Australia right now?
http://www.informationclearinghouse.info/56814.htm
with George Galloway
(11:31)
MAX IGAN FLEES AUSTRALIA FOR MEXICO
https://www.brighteon.com/3ec3880e-a12a-4549-8a79-25cdf442a288
(4:17)
===========
i.
From: The Real News Network
[mailto:contact@therealnews.com]
Sent: Tuesday, October 19, 2021 4:24 PM
Subject: Fight like the world is ending
Robin D.G. Kelley,
world-renowned scholar and activist, discusses why we must continue dreaming of
and fighting for a better world in the face of runaway capitalist pillage and
climate catastrophe, in conversation with TRNN's Maximillian Alvarez.
|
|
|
||||
===========
j.
Trauma & Transformation in an
American Prison
Part 2
with Chris Hedges and Hugh Hamilton
On the show in the second of a two-part interview,
journalist Hugh Hamilton discusses with Pulitzer Prize-winning journalist and
author Chris Hedges the role of race and poverty in mass incarceration, as
chronicled in his new book Our Class: Trauma and Transformation in an American
Prison. The pipeline that fuels our system of mass incarceration runs through
the intersection of race and poverty in all too many of our neglected and
marginalized urban centers. In his new book, Our Class, author Chris Hedges
describes the impact of this debilitating poverty that pervades many of our
cities and towns. He writes: “The social hell of urban America is the great
destroyer of dreams. It batters and assaults the children of the poor. It
teaches them that their dreams, and finally they themselves, are worthless.
They go to bed hungry. They live with fear. They lose their fathers, brothers
and sisters to mass incarceration – and, at times, their mothers. “This social
hell is relentless. It wears them down. It makes them angry and bitter. It
drives them to hopelessness and despair. The message sent to them by the
dysfunctional schools, the decrepit housing projects, the mercenary financial
institutions, gang violence, instability, and ever-present police abuse, is
that they are human refuse.”
+
‘Fighting
to free our people’:
55
years of the Black Panther Party
https://therealnews.com/fighting-to-free-our-people-55-years-of-the-black-panther-party
with Eddie Conway
(18:57)
The Black Panther Party was
founded 55 years ago. Black Panther Party archivist Bill Jennings and Eddie
Conway discuss the enduring legacy of the Panthers and how people are carrying
on that legacy today.
===========
k.
From: The Grayzone
[mailto:grayzoneproject@gmail.com]
Sent: Wednesday, October 20, 2021
Subject: Public health or private wealth? How digital vaccine passports
pave way for unprecedented surveillance capitalism
|
+
Economic Update: Signs of System Decline
http://www.informationclearinghouse.info/56813.htm
with
Richard Wolff
===========
l.
The battle against big landlords in Berlin is just the beginning of a
vital struggle for housing justice
with Marc Steiner
(audio, 22:26)
Voters in
Berlin shocked the world in September by voting to approve a referendum to
expropriate apartments held by giant corporate landlords. As housing becomes
more unaffordable in cities around the world, can the Berlin example be
replicated elsewhere?
by Marc Steiner
===========
m.
From: News from Underground
[mailto:nobody@simplelists.com]
Sent: Wednesday, October 20, 2021
Subject: Daily digest for nfu@simplelists.com
1)
Brits
welcome Bill Gates to 10 Downing Street by Mark Crispin Miller (18 Oct 2021 20:54 EDT)
Reply to list
Attachment: 4_6012316527720663489.mp4 (video/mp4)
2)
HOW, and
WHY, they've pulled this off worldwide, and what to do about it: Iain Davis on
the "pseudopandemic," interviewed by James Corbett
(MUST-SEE/HEAR/SHARE) by Mark Crispin Miller (18 Oct 2021 22:16 EDT)
Reply to list
https://www.corbettreport.com/interview1668/
3)
Two
British schoolchildren suddenly collapse at their respective schools by Mark Crispin Miller (18 Oct 2021 23:11 EDT)
Reply to list
Two
stories separately reported within 24 hours.
https://www.mirror.co.uk/news/uk-news/girl-11-dead-after-suffering-25243414
4)
"Brought
to you by Pfizer" by Mark Crispin Miller (19 Oct 2021 13:00 EDT)
Reply to list
https://twitter.com/_whitneywebb/status/1450464402000556039
5)
Travis
Tritt takes a strong stand against Jim Covid (i.e., "vaccine"
segregation) by Mark Crispin Miller (19 Oct 2021 13:15 EDT)
Reply to list
This
calls for a new salute to Eric Clapton, who's under heavy fire by Rolling Stone
and other bottom-feeders for his righteous opposition to the Order of the Jab:
https://www.rt.com/usa/537183-eric-clapton-vaccine-jam-freedom/
Country
Singer Travis Tritt Takes a Massive Stand Against COVID Tyranny
|
|
Posted:
Oct 18, 2021 9:45 PM
Country
singer Travis Tritt announced Monday that he will no longer play at venues
requiring COVID vaccinations or face masks as a condition for fans to attend.
Tritt, a country music legend with seven platinum albums, more than 40 chart hits, and five number-one singles including "Help Me Hold On" and "Anymore," explained his reasoning in a statement.
"I'm putting my money where my mouth is and announcing that any venue or promoter mandating masks, requiring vaccinations, or pushing COVID testing protocols on my fans will not be tolerated,” Tritt said, as reported by Outsider. "Any show I have booked that discriminates against concert-goers by requiring proof of vaccination, a COVID test, or a mask is being canceled immediately."
Click
on the link for the rest.
6)
We the
People, winning in Trieste by Mark Crispin Miller (19 Oct 2021 13:18 EDT)
Reply to list
Noi,
il Popolo!
but
the revolution will NOT be televised
protest in trieste: we the
people are winning
but the revolution will NOT be televised
https://boriquagato.substack.com/p/protest-in-trieste-we-the-people
Oct 19
you will
not see this in the US media. it seems to be under almost complete coverage
blackout which is astonishing for an event of this magnitude.
protest
in trieste italy has been nonstop all week.
the
crowds have become truly massive and they are NOT going home. brave italians
are standing up to bio-tyranny and the requirement of a “green pass” to work
and shop and live one’s life.
they have refused to cede their liberty to some governmental accreditation scheme because it is a right, not a privilege.
they filled the squares and the thoroughfares in the 10’s and and hundreds of thousands.
perhaps
more:
it has
been enormous. and the police are deployed in huge force to put it down.
they are using water cannons and teargas.
Marie
Oakes @TheMarieOakes
Dockworkers
and demonstrators protesting the compulsory green pass (vaccine pass) for
several days in Trieste, Italy are hit with water canons and teargas while
police evacuate the port blockage.
October 18th
2021
146
Retweets277 Likes
but it
is not having the effect they desired.
instead, the people are growing ever more stalwart and more pour in by the day.
this
message comes directly from trieste, sent by the friend of a friend:
dated
10.19.21
"Hello my friend
Do you see what's going on in Trieste?
I wonder if US news broadcasting situation in Italy.
People stand day and night, police began to use various forces to disperse the crowd, didn't work, People still stood strong and when nothing worked out they started using gas.
After this all residents left for the main town square for massive protesting.
Head of police riot was hysterical, he refused to use force against his people.
Finally minister of agriculture and health minister has agreed to meet protesters and discuss green pass obligation. No news no papers completely covers the real situation.
Only videos from YouTube taken by protesters and witnesses reflect the true.
People from different parts of Italy heading towards Trieste, police are blocking the roads. I guess by Saturday (when the meeting is appointed) there will be millions of people.
After all what happened last night people still don't disperse.
I have more faith now that we will win!
Had to share this news with you.
All the best!
-A”
these are people of courage standing tall for that which is right.
and
they are winning because they are peaceful and implacable.
they are
not going home. they are not fretting about inconvenience. they are reclaiming
the liberty that is theirs by right and making clear who wears the pantalonis
around here.
you get to keep the rights you will fight for. welcome to the fight.
and whoo doggie does the italian government not want this one on pay per view.
apparently, the official webcams of trieste are showing an empty square. it’s gaslighting and propaganda.
they are trying to pretend this is not happening.
amusingly, people are sharing videos of the protesters in the square watching videos of the empty square.
god, i love the internet.
Bernie's
Tweets @BernieSpofforth
Every
single live webcam I checked for #Trieste showed the same empty square. When in
fact it’s full of protestors. “The past was erased, the erasure was forgotten,
the lie became the truth” - George Orwell #NoGreenPass #NoVaccinePassports
October
18th 2021
3,456
Retweets7,212 Likes
this is
truly surreal in every sense of the word.
but it’s
also failing. it’s failing because word is getting out sent by 1000’s of people
on millions of channels. the evidence is everywhere except in the mass media
coddled and colluding with the state.
this is why we the people must make the media and the internet our own, a public square controlled by no one, least of all the government. we do not need truth ministries to establish the facts. their purpose is always to hide, never to reveal.
how much more evidence do you need that they cannot be trusted to tell you the real story?
this is
the literal screaming night terror of the oppressive state: a people in the
streets that will not stand down, will not go home, and will not obey.
because that’s where the power actually lies. it is the ultimate citizen’s veto against tyranny.
and it works on every scale.
look how well the “definitely not a strike that was for sure not about vaccine mandates” worked at southwest to eliminate the impending vaccine driven layoffs.
they stood together. they won. and it was no contest, was it?
Josh
Caplan @joshdcaplan
CNBC:
Southwest Airlines drops plan to put unvaccinated employees who have applied
for but haven’t received religious or medical exemption on unpaid leave
starting in December
October
19th 2021
70
Retweets217 Likes
remember
your freedom and you can have it back. not new normal. not their normal.
YOUR
normal.
this is
how it works.
this is what that looks like.
freedom is back in fashion.
maybe go try some on.
you may find it suits you more than you ever realized.
do you
or someone you know have a bad
cattitude? spread it around.
or sign up. it’s free.
©
2021 el gato malo Unsubscribe
548rket Street PMB 72296, San Francisco, CA 94104
4)
Scores of
patients suing hospitals that won't use Ivermectin to treat COVID (i.e.,
hospitals that won't treat COVID) by Mark Crispin Miller (19 Oct 2021 13:42 EDT)
Reply to list
60+
Ivermectin Lawsuits as Courts Become Battlefield: Hospital Administrations
Against Patients
TrialSite StaffOctober 16, 2021
At least
14 lawsuits are ongoing in the State of New York alone to compel hospitals in
that state to administer ivermectin to severely ill COVID-19 patients. A total
of 60 lawsuits involving demands for ivermectin as a treatment for COVID-19
have been handled by one law firm alone. TrialSite has followed many of these
lawsuits, including an interview with the partner of a leading law
firm leading the legal charge—the Law Office of Ralph Lorigo. While
federal regulators don’t recommend off-label use of the U.S. Food and Drug
Administration (FDA) approved antiparasitic drug, that doesn’t translate to a
legal ban on physicians doing so. Traditionally, physicians had the discretion
to take an off-label drug and, if in their best professional judgment and
assuming appropriate disclosure and approval by the patient, prescribe
off-label to address a particular problem. However, with a concerted effort to
tarnish the name of this drug used by billions primarily in low-and
middle-income countries (LMICs) over the last four decades—with very few safety
issues—a concerted peer pressure to stop doctors and pharmacies from
prescribing also leads to hospitals refusing to use the ...
5) The whole
world is (sometimes) watching: Australian woman brutalized by scrum of cops,
for no reason, right near her home; and Avi Yemeni steps in for her by Mark Crispin Miller (19 Oct 2021 18:26 EDT)
Reply to list
MUST
WATCH: Avi Yemini steps in for woman violently arrested in Melbourne
Another
shameful moment for Victoria Police caught on camera.
By Avi Yemini
October
18, 2021
https://www.rebelnews.com/avi_yemini_steps_in_for_woman_violently_arrested_in_melbourne?utm_campaign=ay_ftfpark_10_18_21&utm_medium=email&utm_source=therebel
7) Two
righteous LAPD officers suing city over "vaccine" mandate: Michael
MacMahon and Vanessa Saucedo interviewed by Reiner Fuellmich by Mark Crispin Miller (19 Oct 2021 19:18 EDT)
Reply to list
8)
"Health
effects of cellphone/cell tower radiation: Implications for 5G" (FREE
WEBINAR, Nov. 3, 12-1 PM PST) by Mark Crispin Miller (19 Oct 2021 19:24 EDT)
Reply to list
Hi
Mark,
This
webinar is free and Joel Moskowitz is an excellent speaker on this timely topic
plus it starts at a time that is timezone friendly for eastcoast timezones and
beyond!
-----
Forwarded Message -----
From:
Joel M. Moskowitz PhD <jmm@berkeley.edu>
To:
list
Sent:
Monday, October 18, 2021, 05:05:01 PM PDT
Subject:
Free Webinar: "Health Effects of Cellphone & Cell Tower Radiation:
Implications for 5G" (Nov. 3, 12-1 PM Pacific Time)
Health
Effects of Cellphone & Cell Tower Radiation: Implications for 5G
Speaker:
Joel M. Moskowitz, PhD
Center
for Occupational and Environmental Health Webinar
November
3, 2021
12 - 1 PM Pacific Time | 2 - 3 PM Central Time | 3 - 4 PM Eastern Time
The
Center for Occupational and Environmental Health (COEH) is one of 18 regional
Education and Research Centers, funded by the National Institute for
Occupational Safety and Health (NIOSH). The ERC supports traineeships at three
UC campuses, UC Berkeley, UC Davis and UCSF.
About the webinar:
97% of
U.S. adults own a cellphone of some kind. The vast majority, 85%, own a
smartphone. This presentation will summarize research on biologic and health
effects from exposure to radio frequency radiation emitted by cell phones and
cell towers. Learners will also discuss the implications of this research for
5G, the fifth generation of cellular technology.
Learning
objectives:
At the
completion of this activity, the learner will be able to:
-
Describe what wireless or radio frequency (RF) radiation is, including 5G, and
its relationship to ionizing radiation
- Summarize the biologic and health effects caused by, or associated with, RF
radiation exposure
- Explain why current national and international RF radiation exposure limits
fail to protect the health of humans and other species
Speaker: Joel M. Moskowitz, PhD
Joel M.
Moskowitz, PhD, has directed the Center for Family and Community Health in the
School of Public Health at the University of California, Berkeley since 1993.
Dr. Moskowitz has published research on disease prevention for 40 years. In
2009 he served as the senior author on a hallmark paper
reviewing research on mobile phone use and tumor risk published in the Journal
of Clinical Oncology. Last year he updated this meta-analysis in a paper published in the
International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health. This year he
co-authored a paper on
electrohypersensitivity published in the International Journal of Molecular
Sciences.
Since 2013 he has translated and disseminated research on the biologic and health effects of wireless radiation through his website (https://saferemr.com). In 2017, with legal representation from the UC Berkeley Environmental Law Clinic, he won a lawsuit against the California Department of Public Health for suppressing its own scientists' cell phone safety guidance for eight years. This resulted in the Department finally publishing cell phone health warnings. He serves as an advisor to Physicians for Safe Technology and to the International EMF Scientist Appeal which was signed by over 250 scientists who published more than 2,000 papers and letters in professional journals on electromagnetic fields and biology or health.
Free Registration
https://www.coeh.berkeley.edu/webinars/21web1103
--
Joel M.
Moskowitz, Ph.D., Director
Center for Family and Community Health
School of Public Health
University of California, Berkeley
Electromagnetic Radiation Safety
Website: https://www.saferemr.com
Facebook:
https://www.facebook.com/SaferEMR
Twitter:
@berkeleyprc
9) First
Amendment under fierce attack as DoJ goes after parents protesting mask
mandates, CRT by Mark Crispin Miller (19 Oct 2021 19:29 EDT)
Reply to list
...
but Trump and his "deplorables" are NAZIS!
From
the desk of Patrick Wood
Dear
Mark Crispin,
The most egregious attack on the First Amendment has come from the U.S. Department of Justice, which is now turning the forces of government, including the FBI, against parents who are protesting and engaging with school boards across the nation.
You know. These are the parents who are fed up with things like forced mask mandates for their children and the teaching of critical race theory.
What the DoJ just did is inconceivable but it happened, and you can read about it in our latest blog post: Department of Justice Slams First Amendment, Claims Parents Are Engaged In “Domestic Terrorism And Hate Crimes”.
We must take courage and then take action in every local community to shatter this tyrannical attempt to destroy the First Amendment.
As you stock up on the CFFS brochures, Action Cards and "no mask" lanyards, please engage with all local parents in your area and give them this material. Support them. Encourage them. Educate them. Stand with them.
Note:
All of our brochures are shrink-wrapped 25 to a pack and are written
exclusively for CFFS by board-certified neurosurgeon Dr. Russell Blaylock.
The "No Mask" card includes a printed lanyard for you to wear whenever you are out. They are made of sturdy plastic and printed on both sides.
For Liberty,
Patrick
Wood
http://www.citizensforfreespeech.org/
Citizens
for Free Speech · PO Box 52247, Mesa, AZ 85208, United States
This
email was sent to mark.miller@nyu.edu. To stop receiving emails, click here.
You
can also keep up with Patrick Wood on Twitter or Facebook.
Created
with NationBuilder,
software for leaders.
---
Support News from Underground: https://bit.ly/NFUSupport
Visit News from Underground: https://markcrispinmiller.com
For archives, please go to: https://archives.simplelists.com/nfu
===========
n.
From: The Real News Network
[mailto:contact@therealnews.com]
Sent: Wednesday, October 20, 2021
Subject: A staggering number of inmates have died in Louisiana prisons
Plus IATSE film
and TV workers have a tentative deal. Will they accept it? And US punishes
Russia but is giving UAE a free pass
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
===========
o.
More Skeletons in Obama’s Closet: Mass Grave in Lugansk,
Ukraine
Yields Over
200 Bodies
by Russell Bentley
A Part of Obama’s Legacy that Presumably Won’t Be
Celebrated in his $482 Million Presidential Library
I recently witnessed the exhumation of human remains from
a mass grave that contains more than 200 bodies. It was a profound and
profoundly disturbing experience. Each body in this grave represents an
unnecessary and unjust death, a murder, and each of these more than 200 murders
can never be forgotten or forgiven.
There is a message that cries out from these bones that
must be heard and understood, and acted upon by all good people in the world.
Otherwise, history will repeat itself, and again, the killers and the killing
will continue, and more mass graves will be filled.
+
Report Reveals European Firms Have More Than $255B Entwined
in Illegal Israeli Settlements
by Jessica
Buxbaum
+
Amazon and Google: partners in Israeli apartheid
https://electronicintifada.net/content/amazon-and-google-partners-israeli-apartheid/34131
by Jonathan
Cook
+
SFSU and Zoom undermine Palestinians and academic freedom
by Omar Zahzah
===========
p.
The Idiot Box: How TV Hypnotizes You
https://www.minds.com/CorbettReport/blog/the-idiot-box-how-tv-hypnotizes-you-1296463884495884297
by James
Corbett
You can tell a lot about an item by the nicknames we give
it. So what do our nicknames for the television tell us about that device?
"The idiot box."
"The boob tube."
"The tell-lie-vision."
It doesn't take a super sleuth to puzzle this one out.
From the very inception of commercial television in the 1950s—when the phrase
"boob tube" was first coined to lament the dumbing-down effect that the device was
presumed to be having on the populace—to the zenith of the TV's cultural
hegemony in the late 20th century, fears about the television's ability to
create zombified couch potatoes out of its passive audience have been
ever-present.
It's no coincidence that the 2006 comedy (or should that
be docudrama?), Idiocracy, introduces its
viewers to the eponymous future idiocracy—in which the intelligence of the
population has declined to shockingly low levels—by showing a junk
food-ingesting "lawyer" in the midst of enjoying the hit television
show of the year 2505, Ow! My Balls! It's also no coincidence that the same movie sees
protagonist Private Joe Bauers formulating a plan for heading off the
development of this idiocracy by encouraging people to read books rather than
watch TV.
+
The Four Layers of Reality
— and Why We’re Only Allowed to Talk
About One
by Lee Camp
===========
q.
From: News from Underground
[mailto:nobody@simplelists.com]
Sent: Friday, October 22, 2021
Subject: Daily digest for nfu@simplelists.com
11) NIH
admits funding gain-of-function COVID experiments, and "failed to
report" it by Mark Crispin Miller (21 Oct 2021 11:16 EDT)
1)
NIH
Admits Funding Gain-Of-Function COVID Experiments; Gives EcoHealth Five Days To
Report Data
by
Tyler Durden
Oct.
21, 2021
A top
NIH official admitted in a Wednesday letter that the US-funded
so-called "gain-of-function" research in Wuhan, China - and that
the US nonprofit which conducted it, EcoHealth Alliance - led by the
controversial Peter Daszak, "failed to report" that they had
created a chimeric bat coronavirus which could infect humans.
In a letter addressed to Rep. James Comer (R-KY), NIH Principal Deputy Director Lawrence A. Tabak cites a "limited experiment" to determine whether "spike proteins from naturally occurring bat coronaviruses circulating in China were capable of binding to the human ACE2 receptor in a mouse model." According to the letter, humanized mice infected with the modified bat virus "became sicker" than those exposed to an unmodified version of the same bat coronavirus.
Click
on the link for the rest.
2)
More
evidence of the child sacrifice performed to get HEK 293, the fetal cell line
used for COVID "vaccine" testing by Mark Crispin Miller (21 Oct 2021 11:26 EDT)
Reply to list
More
evidence for infanticide in creation of the fetal cell line used for COVID
vaccine testing
by
Jon Rappoport
October
20, 2021
(To join our email list, click here.)
“To obtain embryo cells, embryos from spontaneous abortions cannot be used, nor can those obtained by means of abortions performed via the vagina: in both cases, the embryo will be contaminated by micro-organisms.”
“The correct way consists in having recourse to Caesarian section or to the removal of the uterus. Only in this way can bacteriological sterility be guaranteed.”
“In either case, then, to obtain embryo cells for culture a programmed abortion must be adopted, choosing the age of the embryo and dissecting it while still alive, in order to remove tissues to be placed in culture media.”
“Given these premises, we face the dilemma of whether the deliberate systematic destruction of a human creature to obtain cell material can be justified, when it is recognized that this is of great interest to fundamental research and for the diagnosis of some human diseases. Are research and diagnosis of such great value that they justify the destruction of human beings?”
“The Geneva Declaration affirms that the doctor has the duty to take the greatest care to safeguard the life of a human being from its conception and will not, even under threat, use his knowledge to infringe humanitarian laws.” (1986-04-26; Herranz, Gonzalo; Il Sabato, no.15…Professor Herranz was, at the time, president of the Committee of Medical Ethics of Spanish Doctors and vice-president of the Permanent Committee of Medical Ethics of the European Community.)
What exactly happened in 1972 or 1973, in the Netherlands, where an infant girl was aborted, and her kidneys used to make a cell line that would be used, going forward, in the testing of vaccines?
That cell line is called HEK 293 (HEK stands for human embryonic kidney), and it has been used to test COVID vaccines.
I have already presented evidence for concluding the abortion involved removing the living infant from her mother’s womb, and taking her kidneys, which of course killed her.
This evidence rests on the realization that, in order to extract viable and useful kidney tissue, the baby had to have a functioning blood supply, which meant she was alive.
But the evidence ALSO comes from knowing many other abortions have been carried out, in order to harvest tissue for medical research, by murdering living babies.
I have found a very informative article (2/9/2021) at the Centre for Bio-Ethical Reform UK, by Christian Hacking, titled, “What the HEK?!” by Christian Hacking. Quoting from the article:
Click
on the link for the rest.
3)
More on
the microbiota found in those "vaccines" by Mark Crispin Miller (21 Oct 2021 11:33 EDT)
Reply to list
Observations
of Possible Microbiota in COVID mRNA Vaccines
More
slides . from all four injection vials.
https://www.orwell.city/2021/10/microbiota.html
Sent
with ProtonMail Secure Email.
4)
"Vaccine"
mandates causing EMS short-staffing nationwide by Mark Crispin Miller (21 Oct 2021 11:39 EDT)
Reply to list
Yet
another way in which those "mandates" kill—and by design; for
this exquisite Holocaust can be no accident.
Covid-19
Vaccine Mandates Leading to Emergency Service Staff Shortage, Endangering
Americans
BY CAPTAINDARETOFLY ON OCTOBER 21, 2021 • ( LEAVE A COMMENT )
The
collapse caused by the elites and others exploiting the Covid-19 pandemic for
their own gains is not only affecting the supply chain in America but is
beginning to have an impact on the 9-1-1 systems in various communities.
A new report from an emergency medical service (EMS) organisation warns that there is a nationwide shortage of staff that is likely going to imperil Americans if trends continue.
In an interview with Fox News on October 10th, American Ambulance Association President, Shawn Baird, said: “This has been a problem that has been developing over several years because of chronic underfunding shortfalls from Congress for ambulance services, but certainly during the pandemic, things have hit a crisis level.”
Baird added that in recent months, “we’ve seen a tremendous amount of workforce attrition and schools had shut down paramedic training institutions and stopped graduating new students for the last year, so we’re suddenly in a severe shortfall.”
In the past few weeks, his group sent a letter to leaders in the House and Senate warning that the country’s EMS system is “facing a crippling workforce shortage,” adding that it’s a “long-term problem that has been building for more than a decade.” The letter also warned that the labour shortage is going to undermine the 9-1-1 emergency response system and therefore deserves attention from Congress.
5)
NYC
firefighters defy "vaccine" mandate by Mark Crispin Miller (21 Oct 2021 11:45 EDT)
Reply to list
NYC
Firefighters Defy Vaccine Mandate
https://www.oann.com/nyc-firefighters-defy-vaccine-mandate/
Andrew
Ansbro, FDNY Uniformed Firefighters Association President, speaks during a news
conference to address a newly announced COVID-19 vaccine mandate, Wednesday,
Oct. 20, 2021, in New York. (AP Photo/John Minchillo)
OAN
Newsroom
UPDATED
6:56 PM PT – Wednesday, October 20, 2021
New York
City firefighters are taking a stand against Mayor Bill de Blasio (D-N.Y.). The
Uniformed Firefighters Association revealed it would not be enforcing vaccine
mandates on any of its members.
During a press conference Wednesday, the organization made the announcement as a response to the New York citywide mandate. This comes as Mayor de Blasio has ordered all municipal employees to be vaccinated or face unpaid leave.
UFA President Andrew Ansbro, however, made clear they would not be cutting staff, stating it would put their community at risk.
“I’ve told my members that if they choose to remain unvaccinated, they must still report for duty. And if they are told that they cannot work, it will be the department and the city of New York that sends them home and it will be the department and the city of New York that has failed to protect the citizens of the city of New York,” stated Ansbro. “The blame will not be on New York City firefighters.”
Click
on the link for the rest.
6)
Rage
Against WHAT Machine? The human body? by Mark Crispin Miller (21 Oct 2021 16:47 EDT)
Reply to list
Now
they won't play for the "unvaccinated."
https://www.scotiabankarena.com/events/detail/rage-against-the-machine (see Policies)
7)
Go
Fuellmich! CDC/WHO/Davos Group now finally SUED for crimes against humanity by Mark Crispin Miller (21 Oct 2021 17:34 EDT)
Reply to list
1,000
Lawyers and 10,000 Doctors Have Filed a Lawsuit for COVID-19
"Vaccine" Violations of the Nuremberg Code
WORLD NEWSDESK 21 OCTOBER
2021 HITS: 11089
A large
team of more than 1,000 lawyers and over 10,000 medical experts, led by Dr.
Reiner Fuellmich, has initiated legal proceedings against the Centers for
Disease Control (CDC), WOrld Health Organization (WHO), and the Davos Group,
for crimes against humanity.
Fuellmich and his team present the incorrect PCR test and the order for doctors to describe any comorbidity death as a Covid death – as fraud.
The PCR test was never designed to detect pathogens and is 100% inaccurate at 35 cycles. All PCR tests monitored by the CDC are set at 37 to 45 cycles. The CDC acknowledges that tests over 28 cycles are not allowed for a positive reliable result.
This invalidates over 90% of the alleged Covid cases / “infections” detected by the use of this incorrect test.
In addition to the incorrect tests and fraudulent death certificates, the “experimental” vaccine itself violates Article 32 of the Geneva Convention.
Under Article 32 of the 1949 Geneva Convention, “mutilation and medical or scientific experiments not required for the medical treatment of a protected person” are prohibited.
According to Article 147, conducting biological experiments on protected persons is a serious breach of the Convention.
The “experimental” vaccine violates all 10 Nuremberg codes – which carry the death penalty for those who try to break these international laws.
1) Provides immunity to the virus
This is a “leaky” gene therapy that does not provide immunity to Covid and claims that they reduce the symptoms, but double-vaccinated are now 60% of patients who need ER or ICU with covid infections.
2) Protects the recipients from getting the virus
This gene therapy does not provide immunity and the double vaccine can still catch and spread the virus.
3) Reduces deaths due to viral infection
This gene therapy does not reduce deaths from the infection. Double-vaccinated people infected with Covid have also died.
4) Reduces the circulation of the virus
This gene therapy still allows the virus to spread because it gives zero immunity to the virus.
5) Reduces the transmission of the virus
This gene therapy still allows transmission of the virus because it does not confer immunity to the virus.
The following violations of the Nuremberg Code apply:
CLICK
ON THE LINK FOR THE REST.
8)
"Conscience
and the Nuremberg Code": MUST-READ on the context for Fuellmich's lawsuit by Mark Crispin Miller (21 Oct 2021 18:00 EDT)
Reply to list
Conscience
and The Nuremberg Code
Informed
Consent, Censorship, and Inalienable Rights
David
T. Ratcliffe, rat haus reality press, 19 Oct 2021
https://ratical.org/PandemicParallaxView/Conscience-and-The-Nuremberg-Code.html
Begun in early Spring, this a reflection of the truth as I see it by following
one's conscience in terms of The Nuremberg Code on Permissible Medical
Experiments. Enacted in 1947, the war crimes tribunaljudgement at Nuremberg
established 10 principles which must be observed in order to satisfy moral,
ethical and legal concepts. The incomprehensible human suffering during World
War II resulted in a foundational code of medical ethics formulated during the
Nuremberg Doctors Trial to ensure that human beings would never again be
subjected to involuntary medical experimentation and procedures.
A few excerpts:
The word conscience, which means our ability to judge our own actions according
to right and wrong, is derived from the Latin word conscientia, meaning a
knowing together with another or others. That word in turn derives from con
(cum) = with + scire = to know. Thus conscience, which usually refers to one
person’s conscience, also involves a sharing with others, a knowing with. The
word science as we understand it today, also derives from scire, and in the
19th century before the modern understanding of science developed, the word
science simply meant knowledge. Furthermore, the word consciousness also has
the same root, suggesting the connection between conscience and consciousness
and the social nature of the sense of right and wrong and shared human
consciousness.
* * *
The
concerted suppression of any perspective and analysis contrary to the official
narrative is the actual source of increasing danger. Censorship is the ultimate
tool to smother and extinguish the free exchange of ideas and from this the
freedom to think. Robert Heinlein captured the essential power exercised
by censorship
in his 1949 novel, Revolt in 2010. The
story revolved around efforts to overthrow a 100-year theocratic totalitarian
United States of America:
I
began to sense faintly that secrecy is the keystone of all tyranny. Not force,
but secrecy ... censorship. When any government, or any church for that matter,
undertakes to say to its subjects, “This you may not read, this you must not
see, this you are forbidden to know,” the end result is tyranny and oppression,
no matter how holy the motives. Mighty little force is needed to control a man
whose mind has been hoodwinked; contrariwise, no amount of force can control a
free man, a man whose mind is free. No, not the rack, not fission bombs, not
anything—you can’t conquer a free man; the most you can do is kill him.
Adopting
today’s corporate empire medical dogma approaches a religious acceptance of
sacrificing an array of inalienable rights—including freedom of speech, freedom
of assembly, freedom of movement, freedom to conduct commerce, and from these,
freedom of thought—for the false promise of beingsafe via monetized media and
big tech information cartels’ 24/7 fear programming. It is painful and
wrenching to confront any situation where one has been misled by sources one
has implicitly trusted. The concerted and increasing suppression of the free
flow of information, is the Red Alert indicator Benjamin Franklin warned of
when he wrote, “Those who would give up essential Liberty, to purchase a little
temporary Safety, deserve neither Liberty nor Safety.” George Carlin channelled Ben
Franklin on
this.
* * *
In 1986 Congress granted pharmaceutical corporations
complete blanket legal immunity from liability for injury caused by licensed
vaccines right up to the present day with Covid-19 experimental injections
including Moderna and Pfizer
experimental gene therapies in phase 3 clinical trials for more than 10 months. The
actual ongoing effects and repercussions of these injections will never be
acknowledged by the truth cutouts:
Through
8 Oct 2021, the Vaccine Adverse Events Reporting System (VAERS)—the primary
government-funded system for reporting adverse vaccine reactions in the
U.S.—released data showing a total of more than 798,636 reports of COVID
vaccine injuries from all age groups following COVID vaccines, including 16,766 deaths and
117,399 serious injuries between 14 Dec 2020 and 8 Oct 2021.
As
of 9 Oct 2021, the WHO-sponsored European Union Drug Regulating Authorities
adverse reaction website, EudraVigilance (European database of
suspected adverse drug reaction reports) reported 2,563,768 injuries including 27,247 deaths and
1,222,818 serious injuries following injections of four experimental COVID-19
shots:
COVID-19 MRNA VACCINE MODERNA
(CX-024414)
COVID-19 MRNA VACCINE
PFIZER-BIONTECH
COVID-19 VACCINE ASTRAZENECA
(CHADOX1 NCOV-19)
COVID-19 VACCINE JANSSEN
(AD26.COV2.S)
Through 8 Oct 2021, OpenVAERS has recorded 16,766 COVID
Vaccine Reported Deaths / 25,799 Total VAERS Reported Deaths, 79,699 Total
COVID Vaccine Reported Hospitalizations/157,708 Total VAERS Reported
Hospitalizations and 798,634 COVID Vaccine Adverse Event Reports.
Put in place in 1990, VAERS is a voluntary reporting system that has been
estimated to account for only 1% (see the Lazarus Report) of vaccine injuries.
OpenVAERS is built from the HHS data available for download at vaers.hhs.gov. The OpenVAERS Project
allows browsing and searching of the reports without the need to compose an
advanced search (more advanced searches can be done at medalerts.org or vaers.hhs.gov)
*
* *
Compounding this unprecedented collective madness—to inject every human being
on Mother Earth with a set of “one size fits all” unlicensed experimental drugs
including Moderna and Pfizer
experimental gene therapies for a virus with a 99% survival rate and absolutely no medium or long -term data about the
resultant biological consequences—is the parallel agenda censoring knowledge
and suppressing employment of a host of inexpensive, effective, non-patentable
repurposed drugs with decades-long track records of efficacious therapeutic
value. As Dr. Henry Ealy has observed, “Ivermectin, Vitamin D,
Vitamin C, Vitamin A, Zinc, Quercetin, HCQ, Doxycycline...all have literally
HUNDREDS OF BILLIONS of doses administered over DECADES and their COMBINED
injury history is FAR less than 1% of what the experimental COVID inoculations
have accrued in just 7 months.”
The censorship of the efficacy of life-saving drugs is wrong, criminal,
ethically and morally bankrupt, and evil. If these repurposed drugs with
decades-long track records of health benefits—including Ivermectin and Hydroxychloroquine, both of which are listed on the WHO’s Model List of Essential Medicines—had been used beginning last
year, needless untold deaths would have been averted and state-declared
emergencies enabling totalitarian rulings that have nullified civil, constitutional,
and human rights would have ceased.
If Covid-19 is such a deadly disease, isn’t it strange that even after more
than a year and a half, public health authorities have not announced any early
treatment or prophylaxis protocols? NO ONE of leading United States Public
Health Officials—including Anthony Fauci, Francis Collins, Deborah Birx, Robert
Redfield, Stephen Hahn, Robert Kadlec, Janet Woodcock, Rochelle Walensky, Vivek
Murthy, Xavier Becerra—have used their Bully Pulpits to constantly emphasize
and encourage inexpensive, essential immune system support using, at a minimum,
Vitamins D, C, and Zinc. Whose interests are being served in this situation?
Despite Big Tech’s parroting bought-and-paid-for official pronouncements
courtesy of corporate -funded and -directed so-called experts, there is a
wealth of information regarding repurposed drugs found to be highly efficacious
in treating the SARS-CoV-2 virus by practicing physicians and focused
researchers. Two treasure-troves illuminate the true healers following their
consciences, physicians who will forever be revered for risking their careers
to save lives: Dr Justus R Hope MD’s Ivermectin Represents Human
Rights and
Psychologist Diane Perlman’s Open Letter and Challenge for
Rachel Maddow - Ivermectin: Truth or Consequences.
* * *
Despite the increasingly dangerous course pursued by the majority of
governments throughout the world which are debasing and jeopardizing
human medical experiments for doing great good, many physicians—including Doctors for Covid Ethics and World Doctors Alliance—are following their
consciences, risking their careers, medical licenses, and more by standing up
and speaking out against the advancing medical tyranny humanity has been
increasingly subjected to and injured by since Spring 2020.
As of 14 October, as referenced by the Global COVID Summit, the Physicians Declaration contains more than 12,000 signatures. These professional
physicians and scientists, many of whom are on the front lines of treating
Covid patients, accuse Covid-19 policy-makers of crimes against humanity for
preventing the use of life saving treatments on their patients. The following
is cited in multiple sources as being from Dr Robert Malone, original architect
of the mRNA vaccine platform, who read the Rome Declaration at
the Global Covid Summit,
however this text is not in the Declaration:
Thousands
have died from Covid as a result of being denied life-saving early treatment.
The Declaration is a battle cry from physicians who are daily fighting for the
right to treat their patients, and the right of patients to receive those
treatments – without fear of interference, retribution or censorship by
government, pharmacies, pharmaceutical corporations, and big tech. We demand
that these groups step aside and honor the sanctity and integrity of the
patient-physician relationship, the fundamental maxim “First Do No Harm”, and
the freedom of patients and physicians to make informed medical decisions.
Lives depend on it.
*
* *
Following their conscience, Holocaust survivors and their descendants delivered
a letter, We For Humanity, to the European Medicines
Agency (EMA) on 25 August 2021. Signed by Concentration Camp survivors, their
sons, and daughters, and grandchildren, including persons of goodwill and
conscience, it began with:
We,
the survivors of the atrocities committed against humanity during the Second
World War, feel bound to follow our conscience and write this letter.
It is obvious to us that another holocaust of greater magnitude is taking place
before our eyes. The majority of the world’s populace do not yet realize what
is happening, for magnitude of an organized crime such as this is beyond their
scope of experience. We, however, know. We remember the name Josef Mengele.
Some of us have personal memories. We experience a déjà vu that is so
horrifying that we rise to shield our poor fellow humans. The threatened
innocents now include children, and even infants.
In just four months, the COVID-19 vaccines have killed
more people
than all available vaccines combined from mid-1997 until the end of 2013 – a
period of 15.5 years. And people affected worst are between 18 and 64 years old
– the group which was not in the Covid statistics.
We call upon you to stop this ungodly medical experiment on humankind
immediately.
What you call “vaccination” against SARS-CoV-2 is in truth a blasphemic
encroachment into nature. Never before has immunization of the entire planet
been accomplished by delivering a synthetic mRNA into the human body. It is a
medical experiment to which the Nuremberg Code must be applied. The 10 ethical
principles in this document represents a foundational code of medical ethics
that was formulated during the Nuremberg Doctors Trial to ensure that human
beings will never again be subjected to involuntary medical experimentation
& procedures.
The
letter goes on to cite Principles 1, 6, and 10 of theNuremberg Code. The terrible horrors of
unconscionable human suffering and death carried out by other human beings
resulted in the Nuremberg Military Tribunals and from this, the Nuremberg
Code was created as a bulwark against such madness ever occurring again.
* * *
The 1948 Universal Declaration of
Human Rights
begins with “Whereas recognition of the inherent dignity and of the equal and
inalienable rights of all members of the human family is the foundation of
freedom, justice and peace in the world ...”. One definition of the term
inalienable rights is rights that are not transferable or capable of being
taken away or nullified. Inalienable rights are our divine birthright bestowed
upon each of us by our Creator. Michael Swinwood reminds all of us are divine beings
having a physical experience, how dogma has been put on everyone to take away
the idea of our own divinity and put it in the hands of someone else, and that
tyranny started with that idea of laying dogma on people and pulling everyone
away from their own relationship to spirit:
What
we have to come to grips with as human beings as individuals, is our own
connection to spirit. Because everything that you see everywhere happens
because of spirit. It’s the breath of the Divine that allows everything to grow
and breathe and be. And so within that, that’s a very powerful force, much more
powerful than the tyrannical force of this insane consciousness that is imposed
on humanity. It represents the dark force. And what we represent in the end is
the light force.
All
of us who can dispel the hypnotic effects of corporate empire coercive dogma
have a duty to our conscience, to our fellow humans, and to all who follow us
here to resist and collapse the imposition of tyranny causing harms
exponentially greater than the Second World War. Non-violent resistance
following in footsteps of such souls asMohandas Gandhi, Martin Luther King, Philip and Daniel
Berrigan, David Dellinger, Cesar Chavez, Sister Megan Rice, John Schuchardt, James Douglass is the most creative,
constructive way to resist, oppose, and stop the increasing brutality of unfolding
coercive totalitarianism and police state intimidation and violence. In the
final analysis we answer to our Creator for what we express in these lives
we’ve been given, here in this place at this time. It is always our decision
how we perceive our world and what we choose to act upon, stand up for and
stand with.
The Nuremberg Code is a map, created in
response to incomprehensible suffering caused in a struggle where many people
fought back for the sake of free will and freedom to choose one’s course
without coercion. Evermore relevant and vital today, it is a light—remembering
and honoring the sacrifices made—to shine the way for our species’ creative
evolutionary adaptation into our post-industrial-mind conscience and experience
of lived meaning. All our descendants yet to be born and explore their own
lives look to and depend upon us here, now to champion their inalienable right
to self-determination and the freedom to choose. We have a profound response
ability to protect and defend their future lives in the choices we make and
actions we take now.
“
The
message is not “Act now.” Do not accept pressure, coercion, bribes or threats.
Don’t let me or anyone else tell you what to do or when to do it. We are
fighting for the end of the time of dictating each other’s choices, thinking I
know better than you what you should be doing.
I trust you to know the right choice. Being trusted is an invitation to be
trustworthy. Trusting you to be brave, you become brave, just as I become brave
when people see me as brave. Bravery is not a personal achievement; it is a
community function. It is a contagion. It is a mutual awakening.
Bravery means acting when you know it is time to act. It isn’t the convenient
time. It is simply the time. It is the moment of, “Enough!” It is the moment
of, “It is time to do something about it.” It is the moment of truth over
consequences.
In that moment you act not because it is brave, but because it is necessary.
You recognize that the moment has come. Why now? Because it is time. No other
reason is needed.
Bravery means doing what is yours to do, when it is time to do it. Denying that
knowing locks your heart in a box. Life becomes a chore. Despair descends like
a fog, turning everything gray. Hope withers, leaving behind the dry empty husk
called wishful thinking. And you face the dread of living the rest of life
knowing, “I did not do what I was here to do, when the moment came and it
counted.”
The rehearsal is over.
—Charles
Eisenstein, 9 Oct 2021, The Rehearsal is
Over
9)
"Why in
God's name did you get the COVID 'vaccine'?" by Mark Crispin Miller (21 Oct 2021 18:06 EDT)
Reply to list
An
expression of tough love.
https://rivercitymalone.com/health/why-in-gods-name-did-you-get-the-covid-vaccine/
10)
Those
"vaccines" will prevent your full immunity EVEN IF YOU'RE INFECTED
AND RECOVER by Mark Crispin Miller (21 Oct 2021 18:11 EDT)
Reply to list
Hence
the ongoing need for those scare quotes.
URGENT: Covid vaccines will
keep you from acquiring full immunity EVEN IF YOU ARE INFECTED AND RECOVER
Alex Berenson
Oct 21
Don’t
take it from me, I don’t even get to tweet anymore.
Take it from a little place I call the British government. Which admitted today, in its newest vaccine surveillance report, that:
“N antibody levels appear to be lower in people who acquire infection following two doses of vaccination.” (Page 23)
What’s this mean? Several things, all bad. We know the vaccines do not stop infection or transmission of the virus (in fact, the report shows elsewhere that vaccinated adults are now being infected at much HIGHER rates than the unvaccinated).
What the British are saying is they are now finding the vaccine interferes with your body’s innate ability after infection to produce antibodies against not just the spike protein but other pieces of the virus. Specifically, vaccinated people don’t seem to be producing antibodies to the nucleocapsid protein, the shell of the virus, which are a crucial part of the response in unvaccinated people.
This means vaccinated people will be far more vulnerable to mutations in the spike protein EVEN AFTER THEY HAVE BEEN INFECTED AND RECOVERED ONCE (or more than once, probably).
It also means the virus is likely to select for mutations that go in exactly that direction, because those will essentially give it an enormous vulnerable population to infect. And it probably is still more evidence the vaccines may interfere with the development of robust long-term immunity post-infection.
Aside from that, everything is fine.
SOURCE:
©
2021 Alex Berenson Unsubscribe
548
Market Street PMB 72296, San Francisco, CA 94104
---
Support News from Underground: https://bit.ly/NFUSupport
Visit News from Underground: https://markcrispinmiller.com
For archives, please go to: https://archives.simplelists.com/nfu
===========
r.
'In the Spirit of Mandela':
International Tribunal Seeks
to Charge U.S. Government with Crimes
Against Humanity
by Bob Lederer and Matt Meyer
+
U.S. Imperialism in Africa with Abayomi
Azikiwe
http://www.blackagendareport.com/us-imperialism-africa-abayomi-azikiwe
by Danny Haiphong and Margaret Kimberley
+
The Many Crimes of Colin Powell
http://www.blackagendareport.com/many-crimes-colin-powell
by Margaret
Kimberley
+
First Iraq, Then Iran: U.S "Intelligence" Copied and Pasted From the
Internet. Colin Powell's
February 5, 2003
by Prof
Michel Chossudovsky
This article pertaining to Colin Powell’s historical
statement on February 5, 2003 was first published on August 3, 2018.
It should be noted that then Senator Joe Biden endorsed the misleading FAKE statement of
Secretary of State Colin Powell, which was intended to provide the
justification to wage war on Iraq.
The revelation of the “Copied and Pasted” from the
Internet by Prof. Glen Rangwala
was published by Global Research. It is also featured in my book entitled “America’s War on Terrorism”,
Global Research, 2005
+
Colin Powell: Iraqis Will 'not shed
tears' for 2003 Invasion Architect
http://www.blackagendareport.com/colin-powell-iraqis-will-not-shed-tears-2003-invasion-architect
by Alex MacDonald
+
Syria Round Table Interview: Fighting War Propaganda From
Mainstream And Independent Media Alike
https://www.bitchute.com/video/EZ8crEgVRxsT/
with Ryan
Christian
(1:43:05)
+
US Vows To Respond Against Drone
Strikes On Their Forces In Syria
https://www.thelastamericanvagabond.com/us-vows-respond-against-drone-strikes-on-their-forces-syria/
by Robert
Inlakesh
The US government is now seeking retaliation as “its right” after
locations where US forces are allegedly based inside Syria were struck by drone
strike. But how can a foreign military, illegally occupying Syrian land, have
any right to retaliate when their presence there is in and of itself an act of
war?
+
Drone Whistleblower Thrown in Pen With
Terrorists
http://www.blackagendareport.com/drone-whistleblower-thrown-pen-terrorists
by John Kiriakou
===========
s.
Bastille 2.0: “Real Regime Change”:
Building Protest and Resistance
Against the COVID-19 Agenda
by Prof Michel
Chossudovsky
The COVID crisis
engineered by the financial establishment is part of a hegemonic project,
pertaining to control over strategic sectors of the global economy.
The unspoken truth is that the
novel coronavirus provides a pretext and a justification to powerful financial
interests and corrupt politicians to precipitate the entire World into a spiral
of mass unemployment, bankruptcy, extreme poverty and despair.
An unelected “public-private
partnership” under the auspices of the World Economic Forum (WEF), has come to
the rescue of Planet Earth’s 7.9 billion people. The closure of the
global economy is presented as a means to “killing the virus”.
This hegemonic project consists in adopting The Great Reset under the helm of
what the late David Rockefeller entitled “Supranational Sovereignty
of an intellectual elite and world bankers“. This
“alliance” according to Rockefeller is “preferable to the national
auto-determination practiced in past centuries.”
===========
t.
Millions of US Workers Resign
with Jesse Ventura and and Brigida Santos
(23:49)
+
Half a million South Korean
workers walk off jobs in general strike by Jia
Hong and Ju-Hyun Park |
Among OECD countries, South
Korea ranks third in highest annual working hours and workplace deaths. While
also facing rampant exploitation in the “gig economy” and a housing crisis, a
broad working-class coalition is emerging to demand change. |
+
From: The Real News Network
[mailto:contact@therealnews.com]
Sent: Friday, October 22, 2021
Subject: Half a million South Korean workers walk off job in general
strike
A global wave of
organizing and refusal is accelerating, with more and more working people
standing up for dignity and survival in the streets and on the picket lines
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
===========
u.
International Alert Message about COVID-19. United Health
Professionals
by United Health Professionals
(First
published on September 30, 2021)
Since the beginning of the health crisis, the French government has
claimed that early treatment was ineffective. It has imposed major
restrictions on our freedoms, in particular on doctors’ prescriptions,[1]
It has also promised that vaccination would achieve collective
immunity, the end of the crisis and a return to normal life.
But the failure for 18 months of this so-called “health strategy” based
on false simulations, innumerable lies, promises never kept, as well as
the propaganda and fear campaign has become unbearable.
In turn this has been followed by the extortion of consent to be vaccinated, by outright blackmail,
while curtailing our freedoms to move and socialize, our right to work and
engage in leisure activities.
Are the current vaccines that they want to impose on us effective?
Can they lead to a collective immunity or is it only a myth? To answer
this question, we will make the current
sanitary assessment of the most vaccinated countries according to the
figures provided by the World Health Organization and the curves of OurWorldinData. (From Vaccine outset in December 2020 to September 15, 2021)
Record mortality in Gibraltar, champion of Astra
Zeneca injections
Gibraltar
(34,000 inhabitants) started vaccination in December 2020 when the health
agency counted only 1040 confirmed cases and 5 deaths attributed to covid19 in
this country. After a very comprehensive vaccination blitz, achieving 115%
coverage (vaccination was extended to many Spanish visitors), the number of new
infections increased fivefold (to 5314) and the number of deaths increased
19fold. The number of deaths increased 19-fold, reaching 97, i.e. 2853 deaths per million inhabitants, which is
one of the European mortality records. But those responsible for the
vaccination deny any causal link without proposing any other plausible
etiology. And after a few months of calm, the epidemic resumed, confirming that
115% vaccination coverage does not
protect against the disease.
+
The Incidence of Cancer, Triggered by the Covid 19 "Vaccine"
https://www.globalresearch.ca/the-incidence-of-cancer-triggered-by-the-covid-19-vaccine/5758110
by Dr.
Nicole Delépine
Coincidence? The Key Word
Several months ago, we expressed at least “theoretical reservations”
about vaccinating cancer patients or
former patients who had been cured, because of the underlying mechanism of the
gene injection on immunity.
Several geneticists had also expressed their concerns about the possible interference between active or
dormant cancer cells and the activity of gene therapy on lymphocytes in
particular.
Months have
passed, and the vaccine madness has amplified, leading to the refusal of
patients without a passport in hospitals (which, as is well known, are intended
to receive only healthy people) and to the demand that patients be vaccinated
before receiving any treatment, including cancer patients.
We are in a
world gone mad and yet these stories are multiplying, such as this young man of
22 years who had a chronic cough leading to an X-ray discovering a mediastinal
mass. The two big Paris hospitals that received him refused to start the
treatment (without it being explained in detail) if the patient refused the
experimental injection, of absolutely
unknown effects on the development of cancers.
The doctors’
justification? None: “that’s the way it is”, and we have accepted it!
Silence on the colleagues suspended for lack of
obedience and even more on the objective reasons that made them prefer to lose their
jobs, their remuneration, their houses, their families intolerant to these
decisions as well, rather than submit to the presidential ukase to accept
experimental drugs…
Would more
than three hundred thousand caregivers (a figure that is probably highly
underestimated given the number of hospitals and clinics currently forced to
close beds and postpone interventions due to lack of personnel) be crazy,
conspiratorial or delusional to the point of putting themselves in great
personal, social, family, professional and psychological danger?
Have the
doctors who claim that vaccination is safe taken the time to look at the statistics of the effects reported and
accepted by the official agencies? Are the FDA, EMA, MHRA also “conspiratorial”
when they release statistics as in the case of VAERS, which is entity
of the CDC:
VAERS as of September 26, 2021
More than 726,000 Covid vaccine-related adverse events
reported to VAERS as CDC and FDA overturn advisory committee recommendations on
Pfizer’s third vaccine.
VAERS data
released by the CDC included a total of 726,965
adverse event reports from all age groups following Covid vaccines, including
15,386 deaths and 99,410 serious complications between December 14,
2020, and September 17, 2021.[1]
Or Eudra Vigilance pharmacovigilance body of the
European Medicines Agency
Or even the ANSM, our French agency, which
shows more
than 1200 deaths accepted as at least possibly related to these
experimental injections.
All
therapeutic trials for fifty years were stopped after a few deaths for
investigation (53 deaths stopped the H1N1 vaccine). Here, thousands of deaths
throughout the world and children are shamelessly attacked[2]. How can we
continue to believe that this is a health policy?
Why this
denial of the most solid sects on the part of theoretically educated doctors, capable of obtaining information directly
from reliable sources and equipped with a brain?
Fear of the
boss, of the director, who in a few months’ time will inevitably be called into
question, since many countries are backtracking and even Germany wants to get
out of vaccine terrorism, perhaps on the occasion of Mrs Merkel’s departure[3].
“The leading organizations of contracted physicians in
Germany are demanding an immediate end to the “anti-corona” measures and an end
to the “horror rhetoric and panic politics”. Obviously, French hospital doctors in
Paris and elsewhere do not read German newspapers and are terrorized by the
threats of their professional association, their minister, and become kapos[4]
and terrorize their patients.
More and More Testimonies are Coming In
+
High Recorded Mortality in Countries Categorized as "Covid-19
Vaccine Champions"
by Gérard
Delépine
Since the beginning of the health crisis, the French government has
claimed that early treatment was ineffective. It has imposed major
restrictions on our freedoms, in particular on doctors’ prescriptions,
It has also promised that vaccination would achieve collective
immunity, the end of the crisis and a return to normal life.
But the failure for 18 months of this so-called “health strategy”
based on false simulations, innumerable lies, promises never kept, as well
as the propaganda and fear campaign has become unbearable.
In turn this has been followed by the extortion of consent to be vaccinated, by outright blackmail,
while curtailing our freedoms to move and socialize, our right to work and engage
in leisure activities.
Are the current vaccines that they want to impose on us effective?
Can they lead to a collective immunity or is it only a myth? To
answer this question, we will make the
current sanitary assessment of the most vaccinated countries according
to the figures provided by the World Health Organization and the curves of OurWorldinData.
(From Vaccine outset in December 2020 to September 15, 2021)
Record mortality
in Gibraltar, champion of Astra Zeneca injections
Gibraltar (34,000 inhabitants) started vaccination in December 2020
when the health agency counted only 1040 confirmed cases and 5 deaths
attributed to covid19 in this country. After a very comprehensive vaccination
blitz, achieving 115% coverage (vaccination was extended to many Spanish
visitors), the number of new infections increased fivefold (to 5314) and the
number of deaths increased 19fold. The number of deaths increased 19-fold,
reaching 97, i.e. 2853 deaths per million
inhabitants, which is one of the European mortality records. But those
responsible for the vaccination deny any causal link without proposing any
other plausible etiology. And after a few months of calm, the epidemic resumed,
confirming that 115% vaccination
coverage does not protect against the disease.
Malta: 84% vaccine
coverage, but just as ineffective
Malta is one of the European champions of pseudo-vaccines: on this
island of 500,000 inhabitants, nearly 800,000 doses have been administered,
ensuring a vaccine coverage of nearly 84% with a delay of about 6 months.
But since the beginning of July 2021, the epidemic has started again
and the serious (fatal) forms are increasing, forcing the authorities to
recognize that vaccination does not protect the population and to impose
restrictions.
Here again, the recurrence of the
epidemic in terms of cases and mortality proves that a high rate of vaccination
does not protect the population.
In Iceland, people
no longer believe in herd immunity
In this small country of 360,000 inhabitants, more than 80% are
primo-vaccinated and 75% have a complete vaccination cycle. But by mid-July
2021, new daily infections had risen from about 10 to about 120, before
stabilizing at a rate higher than the pre-vaccination period. This sudden
recurrence convinced the chief epidemiologist of the impossibility of obtaining collective immunity through vaccination. “It’s
a myth,” he publicly declared.
Belgium: recurrence of the disease
despite vaccination
Covid-19
Vaccines Lead to New Infections and Mortality: The Evidence is Overwhelming