Bulletin N° 1044
“Pop Goes
the Weasel”
https://www.dailymotion.com/video/x39d6g5
Nursery Rhymes, Songs for
Kids . . . .
'Round and 'round the
cobbler's bench
The monkey chased the weasel,
The monkey thought 'twas all in fun
Pop! Goes the weasel.
A penny for a spool of
thread
A penny for a needle,
That's the way the money goes,
Pop! Goes the weasel.
Subject:
"Are You Free?"
Grenoble
June 10,
2022
Dear Colleagues and Friends of
CEIMSA,
For a long time now a ubiquitous graffiti (painted sometimes in red, somtimes in black) across the town of Grenoble reads: Êtes-vous libre?
It’s enough to raise the question; a complex problematic for any thinking person. At any rate our mind begins to work as we go about our daily life in these long summer days of massacres, destruction, and manufactured anxieties.
Corruption in high places is over the top and largely visible to most people. The question can be simply put: Will we become entirely acclimated to this environment with its brand of Papa Doc Voodoo as a way of life? Or will we become conscious of the fact that capitalism itself is organized crime and always has been? Just ask the victims!
Meanwhile we continue our presentation of analyses and interpretations of real social relationships in the profit-motivated culture of these “late-capitalist ” days and nights that absorb us.
“The
Real Anthony Fauci: Bill Gates, Big Pharma,
and
the Global War on Democracy and Public Health”
by Robert F.
Kennedy Jr. (audio edition read by Bruce Wagner)
Audiobook, Part I
(the Dedication & Acknowledgements to Chapter 6)
https://odysee.com/@audioboy:7/The-Real-Antony-Fauci-1:0
(14:52:28)
&
Audiobook,
Part II
(Chapter 7 to the Afterword)
https://odysee.com/@audioboy:7/The-Real-Antony-Fauci-2:0
(12:29:29)
(1035 page electronic MS)
https://resistir.info/livros/kennedy_the_real_anthony_fauci.pdf
(L’édition française : Anthony Fauci, Bill Gates et Big Pharma
- Leur guerre mondiale contre la démocratie et la santé publique, trans. par Pierre Barois)
Table of Contents
Dedications and
Acknowledgements…viii
Introduction…xiv
Chapter 1: Mismanaging
a Pandemic…(con’d.)
Chapter 2: Pharma
Profits over Public Health…118
Chapter 3: The HIV
Pandemic Template for Pharma Profiteering…126
Chapter 4: The Pandemic
Template: AIDS and AZT…148
Chapter 5: The HIV
Heresies…178
Chapter 6: Burning The HIV Heretics…209
Chapter 7: Dr. Fauci,
Mr. Hyde: NIAID’s Barbaric and Illegal
Experiments on
Children…243
Chapter 8: White Mischief: Dr.
Fauci’s African Atrocities…257
Chapter 9: The White Man’s Burden…278
***
Chapter 10: More Harm Than
Good…323
“It’s like waking up in your house with a room full of smoke,
opening
the window to let the smoke out, and then going back to bed.”
—Unnamed Medical Expert
In the last chapter, we heard global public health advocates accuse Bill Gates
and Dr. Fauci of hijacking WHO’s public health agenda
away from the projects that are proven to curb infectious diseases (clean
water, hygiene, nutrition, and economic development) and diverting
international aid to wedge open emerging markets for their multinational
partners and to serve their personal vaccine fetish. This chapter will examine
Gates’ underlying assertion that his African and Asian vaccines are yielding a
net public health benefit. (p.323)
Bill and Tony’s
African Safari.
In the colonial era, Africa provided model precincts
for testing new vaccines. In the 1950s, white colonial overlords rolled out the
red carpet for pharmaceutical companies to perform vaccine experiments on
compliant test subjects numbering in the millions. Drug companies spend some 90
percent of their drug development costs on Phase III
human trials.4 Every trial delay eats into the
critical time period when the product enjoys patent protection. In the 1980s,
Pharma therefore moved most of its clinical trials to poor nations where human
guinea pigs are cheap and even the most severe injuries will rarely delay the
study. Government complicity and anemic corporate liability laws allow vaccine
makers to write off injuries as collateral damage with little consequence or
accountability.
Today, Pharma still regards Africa as the beau ideal to test immunizations, and
as a lucrative receptacle for dumping expired and defective stocks. Bill Gates
has played a key role in legitimizing this arrangement while collaborating with
captive or corrupt WHO officials to scam Western donor nations into footing the
bill, and guaranteeing rich profits for pharmaceutical companies in which,
coincidentally, he holds hefty stock positions. Gates —the “biggest funder of
vaccines in the world” — is heavily invested in lucrative partnerships with
almost all the world’s largest vaccine companies. Bill and Melinda Gates have
continued the tradition of human experimentation in Africa with the WHO
stepping neatly into the role of an enabling colonial vassal.
Following the colonial era, most of Africa’s new nationalist governments
considered healthcare a national priority, and many of them developed model
health programs for their populations. During the 1970s, International Monetary
Fund (IMF) austerity policies bankrupted the best of these programs and left
African nations almost entirely dependent on the WHO to finance National Health
Ministries and vital HIV programs. Using its control of the flow of
international assistance, WHO exerts discipline,
rewards compliance, and punishes resistance to Pharma’s African ambitions. WHO
uses its funding power to bully Afican governments that slack on vaccine uptake. Gates’s pervasive control over WHO has made Africa
his fiefdom. The continent’s populations have become his guinea pigs. Vaccines,
for Bill Gates, are a strategic philanthropy that feed his many vaccine-related
businesses and give him dictatorial control over global health policies
affecting millions of human lives.
DTP Vaccine: African Genocide.
A wave of gruesome brain injuries and deaths followed the introduction of
diphtheria, tetanus, and pertussis (DTP) vaccines in the United States and
Europe in the 1970s. As
early as 1977, a study published by British physicians and researchers in The
Lancet established that the risks of the whole-cell pertussis jab (used in the
DTP vaccine) exceed the risks qssociated with wild pertussis.10
Six years later, a 1983 NIH-funded UCLA study found that Wyeth’s DTP vaccine
was killing or causing severe brain injury, including seizures and death, in 1
in every 300 vaccinated children. The resultant lawsuits caused the collapse of insurance
markets for vaccines and threatened to bankrupt the industry. Wyeth—now
Pfizer—claimed to be losing $20 in downstream liability for every dollar it
earned on vaccine sales, and induced Congress to pass the National Childhood
Vaccine Injury Act in 1986 shielding
vaccine makers from liability.
In 1985, the
Institute of Medicine (IOM) recommended the abandonment of the whole cell
version of the pertussis vaccine—to avert the high incidence of encephalopathy
and deaths. In 1991, the United States, E.U. countries, and Japan switched to a far
safer (but less effective) dead cell (attenuated) vaccine—DTaP—and discontinued
use of the
DTP jab. While Western nations pulled the DTP, WHO gave pharma free rein and
cash to dump its toxic inventories in Africa, Asia, and Central America,
despite strong evidence of its deadly impacts.
Its dangers aside, the old DTP is cheaper to manufacture and more lucrative for
pharma, and so, after 2002, Gates and his surrogates, GAVI, WHO, and Global
Fund made DTP the flagship for their African vaccine program and continued
giving this neurotoxic and often lethal vaccine to some 156 million African
children annually. WHO’s use of DTP as its bellwether
vaccine—to measure national compliance with WHO’s vaccine schedule—has made DTP
today the most popular vaccine on Earth. Health ministries across the world
must demonstrate specific uptake goals with the DTP recommendations in order to
qualify for vital WHO assistance for HIV and other support.
Prior to 2017, neither HHS nor WHO performed the kind of study necessary to
ascertain whether the DTP vaccine was actually yielding the beneficial health outcomes
about which Gates frequently boasts. That year, the Danish government and the
candinavian vaccine behemoths, Statens Serum Institut and Novo Nordisk, commissioned
prominent Scandinavian scientists Søren Mogensen and Peter Aaby— both vocal
champions of the Africa vaccine program—to lead an illustrious team of international researchers to examine all-cause ;ortalities after the DTP
inoculations.
That massive
study put the lie to Gates’s mantric incantation that his investment in the
DTP vaccine has saved millions of lives. In June 2017, the team published a peer-reviewed
study in EBioMedicine, a high-gravitas journal in
Elsevier’s publishing house armada. The article parsed data from a so-called
“natural experiment” in Guinea Bissau, where half the children in certain age groups
were vaccinated and the other half were not. The division was randomized.
That 2017
study (Mogensen et al., 2017) shows that, following their DTP immunization at
three months, vaccinated girls had tenfold higher mortality than unvaccinated
children. The girls were dying of a wide range of diseases—pneumonia, anemia,
malaria, dysentery —and for two decades no one noticed that the dying children
were predominantly those who received the vaccine. The DTP vaccine—while
protecting children against diphtheria, tetanus, and pertussis—had ruined their
immune systems, making them vulnerable to a wide range of deadly nontarget
infections. Mogensen’s team arrived at that conclusion, as had the 1977 Lancet
study researchers exactly forty years earlier: “DTP vaccine may kill more children
from other causes than it saves from diphtheria, tetanus or pertussis.”
In other words, Gates’s DTP vaccine—instead of saving 10 million lives, as he claims—may
have unnecessarily killed millions of African girls. At least seven other
studies have confirmed DTP’s association with high mortality in vaccinated
girls compared to unvaccinated. The idealistic Americans who donated to Gates’s
African vaccine project —believing they were saving African babies—were
actually funding a continent-wide female genocide.
After completing the study and verifying its shocking results, Peter Aaby—a
virtual deity among African vaccine researchers—made an impassioned, and
remorseful, plea to the WHO to reconsider the DTP vaccine. “I guess most of you
think that we know what our vaccines are doing,” he said. “We don’t.”
Gates, WHO, and GAVI ignored Aaby’s appeal and redoubled
their efforts to expand DTP vaccinations and to shore up support for the
girl-killing jab. The Lancet published a commentary by Gates Foundation plenipotentiary
Chris Elias, Dr. Anthony Fauci, and three apparatchiks from lesser Gates-funded
consortia, WHO’s Margaret Chan, UNICEF’s Director
Anthony Lake, and Seth Berkley of GAVI, who portray their deadly African DTP program
as a public health triumph. These charlatans proclaimed DTP as one of the
“bright spots” in global well-being and gasconaded that “more children are
being immunized worldwide than ever before with the highest level of routine
coverage in history (as measured by coverage of three doses of the
diphtheria-tetanus-pertussis (DTP)-containing vaccine).” That project also
involved reputationally demoting Aaby with a defamation campaign.
A subsequent expert review by the founder of the Cochrane Collaborative, Peter
Gøtzsche, condemned the WHO’s attempt to downplay the risks of DTP vaccine. The
Gates and his WHO vassals continue to bully African nations into taking their
lethal DTP vaccines by threatening to withdraw financial aid to their health
departments and HIV programs if the government fails to achieve national uptake targets (90
percent). (pp.324-326)
. . .
Population and
Sterilization Vaccines.
Early twentieth-century America saw the snowballing
popularity of eugenics, a racist pseudoscience that aspired to eliminate human
beings deemed “unfit” in favor of the
Nordic stereotypes. Twenty-seven state governments enshrined elements of the
philosophy as official policy by enacting forced sterilization and segregation
laws and
marriage restrictions. In 1909, California became the third state to adopt laws
requiring sterilization of intellectually challenged Americans. Ultimately,
eugenics practitioners
coercively sterilized some 60,000 Americans.”
John D. Rockefeller, Jr.’s keen interest in eugenics colored his passion for
population control. The oil baron scion joined the American Eugenics Society
and served as trustee of the Bureau of Social Hygiene. The Rockefeller
Foundation dispatched hefty donations in the 1920s and early 1930s to hundreds
of German researchers, including those conducting Hitler’s notorious “twins studies” at the Kaiser Wilhelm
Institute for Anthropology, Human Heredity and Eugenics in Berlin. The
Rockefeller Foundation curtailed donations to Nazi Germany’s medical institutions before Pearl Harbor,
but Rockefeller’s success promoting the eugenics movement had already
captivated Adolf Hitler. “Now that we know the laws of heredity,” Hitler told a
fellow Nazi, “it is possible to a large extent to prevent unhealthy and
severely handicapped beings from coming
into the world. I have studied with interest the laws of several American
states concerning prevention of reproduction by people whose progeny would, in
all
In the early 1950s, the Rockefeller Foundation conducted fertility studies in
India that historian Matthew Connolly characterizes as an example of “American
social science at its most hubristic.” In one of the collaborations with the
Harvard School of Public Health and India’s Ministry of Health, the Rockefeller
Foundation studied 8,000 tribal people in seven villages in the Khanna section
of Punjab to determine whether contraceptive tablets could dramatically
reduce fertility rates. According to Linsey McGoey, “The villagers were treated like lab specimens, subjected to monthly questioning
but otherwise ignored.”
Rockefeller’s researchers did not initially inform the Punjabis that their
pills would prevent women from bearing children. McGoey describes the villagers
as “shocked,” “dismayed,” and “resentful” to learn that the medication they
credulously consumed was intended to render them infertile: “Some were incensed
by the effort to limit their future progeny.”
Over the next two decades, the Rockefeller Foundation conducted frequent
anti-fertility programs in India and elsewhere, earning the growing animosity
of physicians, human rights activists, and poverty specialists who criticized
the foundation for focusing on population growth while ignoring the realities
of persistent poverty that makes large families so indispensable to Indian and
African villagers.
“Today,” McGoey adds, “the Gates Foundation is pouring money into experimental
medical trials that are facing criticism similar to those directed at the
[Rockefeller Foundation’s] Khanna study. Like earlier philanthropic foundations,
The Gates Foundation has the financial and political clout to intervene in
foreign nations with relative impunity, and to remain unfazed when the
experiments it funds go awry.”
Gates’s fetish for reducing population is a family pedigree. His father, Bill
Gates Sr., was a prominent corporate lawyer and civic leader in Seattle with a
lifelong obsession for “population control.” Gates Sr. sat on the national
board of Planned Parenthood, a neo-progressive organization founded in 1916 by
the racist eugenicist Margaret Sanger to promote birth control and
sterilization and to purge “human waste” and “create a race of thoroughbreds.”
Sanger said she hoped to purify the gene pool by “eliminating the unfit”
persons with disabilities-preventing such persons from reproducing by surgical
sterilization or other means.
In 1939,
Sanger created and directed the racist Negro Project, which strategically
co-opted Black ministers in leadership roles to promote contraceptives to their
congregations. Sanger stated in a letter to her eugenics colleague, Clarence
Gamble (of Procter & Gamble), “We do not want word to go out that we want
to exterminate the Negro population and the minister is the man who can straighten
out that idea if it ever occurs to any of their more rebellious members.”
“When I was growing up, my parents were always involved in various volunteer things,”
Gates told Bill Moyers in 2003. “My dad was head of Planned Parenthood. And it
was very controversial to be involved with that.”
Overpopulation, Gates’s father told Salon in a 2015 interview, was “an interest
he’s had since he was a kid.” In 1994, the elder Gates formed the William H.
Gates Foundation (the family’s first), focused on reproductive and child health
in the developing world. Population control was an enduring preoccupation of
his son’s philanthropy from its inception.
Gates has made a long parade of public statements and investments that reflect
his deep dread of overpopulation. He describes himself as an admirer and
proponent of the population doomsayer Paul Ehrlich, author of The Population
Bomb, whom Gates describes as “the world’s most prominent environmental
Cassandra,” meaning a prophet who accurately predicts misfortune or disaster.
By the way, I share Gates’s fear that if humanity persists in juxtaposing
exponential population expansion atop linear resource growth, we will all land
in a nightmarish Malthusian dystopia. I’m troubled, however, by his apparent comfort in using
coercive and mendacious tactics to trick poor people into dangerous and
unwanted contraceptive programs. The proven paths to zero population growth are
the mitigation of poverty and empowerment of women. Women with alternative
career opportunities seldom choose the heavy and hazardous burden of serial
maternity. Virtually every nation with a stable middle class has fertility
below replacement rates. But Gates’s careless public statements and the
programs that he habitually funds suggest that Gates has involved himself in
sketchy stealth campaigns to sterilize dark-skinned and marginalized women
without their informed consent—including by the deceptive use of dangerous sterility
vaccines.
On February 20, 2010, less than one month after he famously committed $10
billion to the WHO, Bill Gates suggested in his “Innovating to Zero” TED Talk
in Long Beach, California, that reducing world population growth could be done
in part with “new vaccines”:
The world today has 6.8 billion people. That’s headed up to about 9
billion [here he is almost quoting Bryant et al.]. Now, if we do a really
great job on new vaccines, health care, reproductive health services,
we could lower that by, perhaps, 10 or 15 percent . . .
Gates’s
defenders—and the Gates-subsidized “Fact Checker” organizations—scoff at
critics who interpret literally Gates’s 2010 statement that he hoped to use vaccines
to reduce population. They explain that Gates intended, by this inartful
construct, to suggest that lifesaving vaccines will allow more infants to
survive to adulthood, thereby reassuring impoverished parents that they need
not have so many children. But this hypothesis rests on the sketchy premise
that his vaccines reduce child mortality—a proposition that Gates has never
demonstrated and that current science does not support. His peculiar choice of
words naturally fueled speculation that he was engaging in a premeditated
campaign to use vaccines to sterilize women. His questionable antics in
promoting antifertility drugs and WHO’s widespread use of stealth sterility
vaccines credibly fuel such sentiments.
Depo-Provera: A Cruel Irony.
Population control has been the central preoccupation
of the Gates Foundation since its inception. In 1999, Gates’ $2.2 billion
commitment to the UN Population Fund doubled the size of the Gates Foundation.
The same year, he funded, with a $20 million contribution, the founding of the
Johns Hopkins Center for Population.
In 2017, the Gates Foundation adopted the goal of administering contraceptives
to 214 million women in poor countries. Gates’ contraceptive of choice is the
long-
term infertility agent Depo-Provera. Population planners have administered
Depo-Provera primarily to poor and Black women in the United States since its
invention in 1967. In the United States, 84 percent of Depo-Provera users are
Black, and 74 percent are low-income. Depo-Provera’s biggest promoter, Planned
Parenthood, specifically targets Blacks and Latinas in its marketing campaigns.
UN data demonstrate that Depo-Provera is seldom administered to White or
affluent women or girls in the United States or Europe.
Depo-Provera is a powerful poison, with a devastating inventory of wretched
side effects: Under federal law, the Depo-Provera label must bear FDA’s most
stringent Black Box warning—due to its potential to cause fatal bone loss. Furthermore,
women have reported both missed periods and excessive bleeding; blood clots in
arms, legs, lungs, and eyes; stroke; weight gain; ectopic pregnancy; depression;
hair loss; decreased libido; and permanent infertility. Some studies have
associated Depo-Provera with dramatic increases (200 percent) in breast cancer risk.
The FDA warns women not to take Depo-Provera for longer than two years, but Gates’ program prescribes at least a four-year
course—or indefinitely—for African women and goes to great lengths to avoid
warning Black women about the concoction’s many drawbacks.
Between 1994 and 2006, Bill & Melinda Gates teamed with the Rockefeller and
Andrew W. Mellon Foundations, the Population Council, and USAID to fund a
seminal family-planning experiment administering Depo-Provera to approximately
9,000 impoverished women in the town of Navrongo and districts of Ghana.
(Though USAID’s stated underlying principles for family planning are
“volunteerism and informed choice,” it hasn’t always worked out that
way.)
A disturbing 2011 exposé of the collaboration by the Rebecca Project for
Justice, “The Outsourcing of Tuskegee: Nonconsensual Research in Africa,”
documented how Gates’ researchers lied to the Navrongo women, telling them that
they were receiving “routine healthcare” and/or “social observations”—never
informing them that they were part of a population control experiment. Gates’ researchers
violated US research laws by failing to administer informed consent forms to the women they injected with Depo-Provera.
Nor did they obtain institutional review board (IRB) approval for a human experiment
that lasted an extraordinary six years. Under direction of Gates’s PI, Dr.
James Phillips, and his fellow Pfizer and Gates’ PIs, deliberately fabricated and falsified research data to
fraudulently “prove” Depo-Provera safe. Based on such “proofs,” in 2011, Gates
expanded his project to fund Depo-Provera programs for some 12 million women
across sub-Saharan Africa.
That same year, 2011, a study by a another prestigious BMGF & NIH-funded
research team from Gates’s own Washington School of Public Health published an
article inLancet Infectious Diseases, Heffron et al. (2012), reporting that
African women who used injectable Depo-Provera were much more likely to acquire
HIV/AIDS compared to untreated women. Depo-Provera injections double a woman’s
risk of contracting and transmitting HIV. This result was not an enormous surprise. For twenty-four years, diverse studies
have shown that Depo-Provera thins the vaginal wall, easing transmission of
HIV. Furthermore, the researchers found Depo-Provera exacerbates the rates of
HIV/AIDS infections to a recipient’s sexual partners. Despite her funding from
Gates, the study’s lead author, Dr. Renee Heffron, and her fellow researchers
recommended informing HIV-infected women of Depo-Provera’s grave risks and to
use alternative non-progesterone-based contraceptives: “Women should be
counseled about potentially increased risk of HIV-1 acquisition and transmission.”
The confirmation of the risk by his own scientists posed an obvious conundrum
for Gates since it pitted his passion for population control against his avowed commitment to end
the spread of HIV in Africa. Population, it turns out, trumps HIV-prevention in
Bill Gates’s catechism.
Without offering any scientific research to substantiate their claims, Gates’s
deputies, a cabal of extreme population control advocates linked to Gates,
worked with Pfizer intermediaries to viciously attack Heffron’s research findings.
The critics included BMGF, Planned Parenthood, the UN, Ronald Gray of the
Gates-funded Johns Hopkins University, James Shelton of USAID’s Office of
Population, and others.
Under these fierce attacks by Gates’s minions in the medical cartel, Dr.
Heffron and her research team courageously stood their ground and retained
their professional integrity. The Lancet published Heffron’s withering response. Dr. Heffron pointed out that her
attackers cited no convincing science and that the two recent studies—by
Heffron and the WSPH team—capped a quarter-century of published research
documenting increased HIV risk among women taking Depo-Provera.
To combat this crisis, WHO—by then, wearing Bill Gates’ boot on its neck—
convened a group of handpicked experts, all sworn to secrecy, for a closed-door
meeting in Geneva on January 31, 2012, to discuss damage control on the Heffron
study and the mountain of HIV research that supported her. On February 16,
2012, WHO and its mysterious expert cabal—unsurprisingly—announced its preordained
decision: Women living with HIV/AIDS or at
high risk of HIV/AIDS can safely use Depo-Provera.
Betsy Hartmann, a longtime reproductive rights advocate, ridiculed WHO’s
convenient new guidelines: “This reversal despite 25 years of studies citing an
increased risk of HIV transmission among women using it raises question marks
whether WHO abandoned caution due to ‘outside encouragement’ by special interest groups.” Hartmann was
clearly referring to BMGF.
In the wake
of WHO’s self-serving declaration, Melinda Gates announced in July 2012 a billion-dollar
contribution as BMGF’s share of a four-billion-dollar collaboration with
USAID, PATH, and Pfizer with the goal of promoting Pfizer’s Depo-Provera across
sub-Saharan Africa. Pfizer and USAID committed the remaining $3 billion to
African
contraceptive projects.
Outcry and censure from dozens of international women’s rights advocates and
reproductive health groups greeted Melinda Gates’ announcement.
According to a detailed report by Jacob Levich, “The Real Agenda of the Gates
Foundation,” “Mrs. Gates minimized the proven risk of acquiring HIV/AIDS with Depo-Provera
by directing the public to a contrived eight-page ‘Technical Statement’
published by the Gates Foundation’s supplicants at WHO, assuring the public that Depo-Provera is safe,
and that all contrary scientific research that linked Depo-Provera to HIV
infection was “inconclusive.”
To quell the growing uproar, Gates funded a WHO study to debunk the HIV association
once and for all. This time he skipped over Heffron to fund a more “reliable”
group of researchers (environmental lawyers call this sort “biostitutes”). On
October 21, 2015, WHO released its investigation—which, not surprisingly, concluded that “There is no evidence of
a causal association between DMPA use and an incidence in women’s risk of HIV acquisition.” WHO then issued new guidelines that mirror precisely
those recommended by Pfizer, Depo-Provera’s manufacturer.
Some forty
reproductive health groups demanded that WHO’s
director, Margaret Chan, sideline the new guidelines until Gates’s study could
survive a rigorous reevaluation process. WHO ignored those pleas.
The centerpiece of the Gates $4 billion caper is a “self-injection” syringe—a plastic
bubble attached to a needle—for administering Depo-Provera. Pfizer creates the
gizmo, but Gates’ Seattle-based legate, PATH, markets it under the new brand
name “Sayana Press.” PATH’s former director, Chris Elias, was by then president
of the BMGF. Through PATH, Gates will distribute these devices, costing $1 per
three-month dose, to 120 million women in sixty-nine of the world’s poorest
countries. With contributions that Gates plans to squeeze from those
governments, these lucky ladies will pay little or none of the cost.
Pfizer, of course, will make a killing. According to the Wall Street
Journal’s Market Watch, “Pfizer could potentially earn approximately $36
billion in sales resulting from an unprecedented Bill & Melinda Gates
Foundation (BMGF) investment—$560 million from BMGF, totaling $4.3 billion with
government contributions—that promotes Depo-Provera as the optimum
contraceptive for women of color and low-income women.”
Levich explains that this scheme is a cunning dodge to evade US regulations
that require Pfizer’s label include its dire Black Box warning bearing the
words: “FDA,” “Black Box,” “warning,” and “osteoporosis,” and that the administering clinician
inform every recipient that the drug poses life-threatening harm. In the United
States, pharmacists can never dispense Depo-Provera directly to a patient to
self-inject, since the law requires that medical personnel counsel each patient
about risks. Ignoring these safeguards in Africa would expose Pfizer to
criminal prosecution and thousands of lawsuits under the Alien Tort Claims Act, which could allow aggrieved African women to sue negligent US drug makers
in US courts if they suffer injuries as the result of failure to warn. Pfizer’s
apparent strategy for insulating itself from liability is to use PATH and BMGF
as surrogates to market its contraception.
Furthermore, to promote Depo-Provera’s uptake among Blacks, PATH makes a series
of outlaw, off-label claims that Pfizer could not legally make about the
product. PATH claims that Depo-Provera protects against endometrial cancer and uterine
fibroids and reduces risks of sickle cell anemia and iron deficiency
anemia—diseases that disparately injure Blacks. FDA has never approved
Depo-Provera for cancer prevention or for any of these other uses. It is
therefore illegal for Pfizer to promote these off-label claims. Presenting
Gates and PATH as its intermediaries is apparently also Pfizer’s strategy for evading
US laws that prohibit off-label claims. Levich adds: “These statements taken in
totality are contextually false and designed to specifically circumvent the
FDA’s Black Box warnings. If Depo-Provera is genuinely a safe and effective
contraceptive, with only minimal side effects, why then are Gates, Hopkins,
USAID, Planned Parenthood, and Pfizer’s other intermediaries deliberately
concealing the plain “Black-Letter” FDA Black-Box warnings in their effort
to minimize and conceal Depo-Provera’s life-threatening harm?”
Put bluntly,
Gates and his confederates are tricking African women into taking the contraceptive
by deceiving them about its safety and lying about its efficacy against diseases that disproportionately harm Blacks—something Pfizer executives could
go to jail for. Gates’s willing partner in this fraud is USAID.
USAID’s Director, Dr. Rajiv Shah, has been a serial coconspirator in Gates’
many racist flim-flams. For a decade prior to his gig running USAID, Shah
worked for Bill Gates’ foundation (2001–2010) as the principal fundraiser for
GAVI’s World Immunization Programs. Shah candidly acknowledged that BMGF’s and
PATH’s stamp of approval on Depo-Provera serves as a clever strategy for insulating
Pfizer from criminal and civil prosecution for violating FDA regulations.
Gates’ caper aims to artfully remove the FDA’s jurisdiction by using PATH as
its surrogate and by effectively transferring regulatory
authority to the WHO.
The Rebecca Project for Justice characterizes Gates’ African project as “A family planning
strategy that unethically targets women of color to prohibit births of beautiful
[Black] children, by not informing mothers of Depo-Provera’s deadly risks as
mandated under US law/regulations; thus, denying women of color their inalienable right to choose
and access safe reproductive health.”
Depo-Provera came honestly to its notoriety as the tool of choice for racist
eugenicists. Israel banned Depo-Provera in 2013 following a scandal in which
government health workers seeking to radically reduce the number of Black births
were targeting African Jews with Depo-Provera. Sharona Eliahu Chai, lawyer for
the Association of Civil Rights in Israel (ACRI), condemned the government
policy of preventing Black Israelis from reproducing: “Findings from
investigations into the use of Depo-Provera are extremely worrisome, raising
concerns of harmful health policies with racist implications in violation of
medical ethics.”
In 2002, India banned this dangerous drug from all family
welfare programs after a similar scandal: government officials were targeting
lower-caste Indians. Many other nations, including Bahrain, Israel, Jordan, Kuwait,
Qatar, and Saudi Arabia, prohibit the use of Depo-
Provera on their nationals. European countries largely restrict the use of
Depo-Provera and require full disclosure of risks for women and informed
consent prior to its use. Gates and USAID have taken advantage of political disorganization
in Pakistan to administer “self-inject” Depo-Provera to Muslim women. In
contrast to its US counterpart, USAID, the Swedish International Development Authority
(SIDA) does not fund, purchase, or provide Depo-Provera for Swedish-assisted
projects in developing countries.
Sterility Vaccines /
Chemical Castration.
Gates’s defenders ridicule as “conspiracy theory” the suggestion
that Gates, or any reputable public health authority, would use “life-saving
vaccines” as a stealth vehicle for surreptitiously rendering women infertile.
But one of Gates’s earliest philanthropic undertakings was a 2002 project to
administer tetanus vaccines to poor women in fifty-seven countries. For reasons
we are about to discover, critics credibly suggest that these vaccines may have
been secretly laced with a formula the Rockefeller Foundation developed to
sterilize women against their will.
On November 6, 2014, four years after Gates pledged at a TED Talk to use
vaccines to lower birth rates, medical researchers and doctors associated with
the Kenya Conference of Catholic Bishops (KCCB) and the Kenya Catholic Health
Commission accused WHO, UNICEF, and GAVI of secretly conducting a mass
sterilization program against Kenyan women, under the veil of eradicating tetanus
disease. The Washington Post reported
similar charges by the Kenya Catholic Doctors Association (KCDA).
The
Catholic doctors became suspicious due to WHO’s glaring
departures from the usual tetanus vaccine protocols. Normally a single tetanus
vaccine provides a decade of immunity. Since men and women are equally susceptible,
both sexes routinely get the vaccine. But WHO instructed Kenyan doctors to give
the vaccine in five administrations, six months apart, and only to girls of childbearing
years.
“The defense that the WHO intended only to target ‘maternal
and neonatal tetanus’ seems odd in view of the fact that males are about as
likely as females to be exposed to the bacterium which is found in the soil
everywhere there are animals,” observed a 2011 peer-reviewed study of the
controversy. The Catholic doctors also noticed other unusual features of the
campaign. For starters, WHO suspiciously initiated its jab campaign not from a
hospital or medical center or any of the estimated 60 local vaccination
facilities, but distributed shots from the luxurious New Stanley Hotel in
Nairobi—an exclusive resort out of reach to most physicians or public health officials.
At considerable cost, a police escort
accompanied the shots to vaccination sites, where police officers strictly
supervised their handling by nursing staff and required clinicians to return
each empty vial to WHO officials at Nairobi’s only five-star hotel under the
watchful eyes of armed officers.
Four years later, in October 2019, the Kenyan Catholic Doctors’ Association
accused UNICEF, GAVI, and the WHO of rendering millions of women and girls
barren. The doctors had by then produced chemical analyses of vaccines verifying their
allegations. Three independent Nairobi accredited biochemistry laboratories
tested samples of the WHO tetanus vaccine, finding human chorionic gonadotropin
(hCG) where none should be present. In October 2014,
Catholic doctors obtained six additional vials and tested them in six
accredited laboratories, finding hCG in half of those samples.
In 2019, a group of independent researchers from Kenya and Great Britain led by
University of British Columbia neurologist Dr. Christopher Shaw studied the
charges and concluded that “the Kenya ‘anti-tetanus’ campaign was reasonably
called into question by the Kenya Catholic Doctors Association as a front for
population growth reduction.” The medical researchers characterized the WHO
program “an ethical breach of the obligation on the side of the WHO to obtain
‘informed consent’ from those Kenyan girls and women.”
Catholic medical personnel made similar accusations about WHO’s
tetanus projects in Tanzania, Nicaragua, Mexico, and the Philippines. Following
indignant denials of all such accusations, and obligatory denunciations against
its accusers, WHO grudgingly admitted it had been developing the sterility
vaccines for decades. WHO nevertheless punished the Kenyan doctors and the community
officials who reported the spiked vaccine by canceling contracts for future work.
The Sordid History of
Sterility Vaccines.
It wasn’t the first time that Catholic medical authorities accused the WHO
of a stealth sterilization campaign against African women. As early as November
1993, Catholic publications charged that the WHO was spiking tetanus vaccines
to neuter dark-skinned women globally with potent abortifacients. WHO denied
the explosive charges.
Shaw’s research team showed that WHO and Rockefeller Foundation scientists
began research on “anti-fertility” vaccines for “birth-control” as early as
1972, by lacing hCG with tetanus toxoid, which acts as
a carrier for the hormone. That year, WHO researchers at a
meeting of the US National Academy of Sciences, reported their successful
creation of a “birth-control” vaccine that diminishes the βhCG essential
to a successful pregnancy and causes at least temporary “infertility.”
Subsequent experiments proved that repeated doses could extend infertility
indefinitely.
By 1976, WHO scientists had successfully conjugated a functional
“birth-control” vaccine. The WHO researchers reported triumphantly that their
formula could induce “abortions in females already pregnant and/or infertility
in recipients not yet impregnated.” They observed that “repeated inoculations
prolong infertility.” More recently, in 2017, WHO researchers were working on
more potent antifertility vaccines using recombinant DNA. WHO
publications explain that the agency’s long-range purpose is to reduce
population growth in unstable “less developed countries.”
The Kenyan tetanus campaign occurred shortly after Gates made his pledge of $10
billion to the WHO with the stated purpose of reducing population with “new
vaccines.” Perhaps to emphasize his commitment
to population control, Gates recruited his most influential vizier, Christopher Elias, as president of Global Development at the Gates Foundation
the following year. Prior to that appointment, Dr. Elias was president/CEO of
Gates’s nonprofit PATH, which partners with pharmaceutical companies to
distribute vaccines to poor countries by persuading rich and poor governments to fork over moolah to multinational
drugmakers in which Gates is invested. Elias ran PATH’s innovative “Sayana
Press” injectable Depo-Provera project designed to end-run US safety regulations
while reducing fertility of Black African women. That brainchild earned Elias
the Klaus Schwab Foundation’s Social Entrepreneur of the Year award in 2005.
The Gates Foundation provided numerous grants to PATH, including one in November 2020 (after Elias had moved over to BMGF) “to
support clinical development of COVID-19 vaccines by Chinese manufacturers.”
Before PATH, Elias had been senior associate in the international Programs
Division of the Population Council, with the responsibility of dampening
fecundity throughout Southeast Asia. John D. Rockefeller III founded The Population
Council in 1952 at a conference he convened for the high priesthood of
population control, including the director of the new Planned Parenthood
Federation of America and several well-known eugenicists. Lamenting that modern civilization had reduced the operation of natural selection by
saving more “weak” lives and enabling them to reproduce, resulting in “a downward
trend in . . . genetic quality,” the group agreed to create an organization devoted
to the “reduction of fertility.” While Rockefeller formally launched the
Council with a grant of $100,000 and served as the first president, the next
two Council presidents were Frederick Osborn and Frank Notestein, both members of the American Eugenics Society. The NIH and USAID were among the
“start-up” funders, and US and foreign governments
soon became the Council’s largest
financial backers.
The Council does research promoting the use of artificial birth control and
abortion and biomedical research to discover and develop new contraceptive
drugs and technologies. It collaborated with the Ford Foundation and International
Planned Parenthood Foundation to develop large-scale IUD programs abroad,
despite its own research doctors warning about acute adverse side effects.
Later, the Council played a key role in developing the extremely
dangerous hormonal contraceptive implant Norplant.
Historian Donald T. Critchlow wrote that the Population Council “cultivated
elite connections and avoided public controversy by identifying itself as a
neutral, scientific organization.”
The US Agency for International Development (USAID) conducted a decades-long
partnership with the Population Council and cultivated long-term alliances with
the Rockefeller Foundation and the WHO researching the use of fertility controls to
reduce world population, especially in sub-Saharan Africa. By 2014, Gates and
Elias had a reliable collaborator at the federal program: USAID Director Rajiv Shah, who
had, prior to winning that appointment, worked a decade for the Gates
Foundation, running GAVI’s immunization program for African children.
Dr. Shah joined the Gates Foundation in 2001 and oversaw its alliance with the
Rockefeller Foundation in launching the Alliance for a Green Revolution in
Africa. He directed the International Finance Facility for Immunization. The
IFFI is a shady agency that finances Bill Gates’ global vaccine enterprises in developing nations through a diabolically
innovative bond issuance scheme that runs up huge debts in poor countries to
finance Gates’ self-serving vaccines. Using sleight of hand, IFFI enriches
Gates’ pharma partners with Western financial bonds by passing the costs to
future generations in poor countries. Shah raised $5 billion through this
swindle for GAVI. At USAID, his primary responsibility was reorganizing the
agency to reflect its new biosecurity direction under Obama’s 2009 executive
order. Shah left USAID to become president of the Rockefeller Foundation in 2017. Shah has deep links to the intelligence agencies and the oil and
chemical cartels. Shah serves on both the Trilateral Commission and the Council
on Foreign Relations, two globalist organizations that the Rockefeller/Kissinger
alliance largely defined. Shah is a board member of the International Rescue Committee, a nonprofit with
long-standing CIA ties. In his 1991 book, Covert Network: Progressives, the
International Rescue Committee and the CIA, University of Massachusetts economics professor Eric
Thomas Chester exposes IRC as a CIA front. Bill Casey, a lifelong spy, who as
Ronald Reagan’s CIA Director helped manage the Iran-Contra affair in the 1980s, chaired IRC
from 1970 to 1971. IRC operates in forty countries doing “humanitarian aid.”
According to its current CEO, David Miliband, the former UK foreign secretary,
Shah’s role on the high-level council is to “monitor political and non-health
issues related to prevention and preparedness imperatives for a potential epidemic
of global proportions.”
In 1974, USAID and WHO collaborated on the creation of a top-secret “Kissinger
Report.” Henry Kissinger—whose patron was Nelson Rockefeller and whose career
was deeply enmeshed with the Rockefeller Foundation—drafted the classified
White Paper, which became official US policy under President Gerald Ford in 1975. That report, known as the US National Security Study
Memorandum 200, outlined the geopolitical incentives for reducing population
growth in “less developed countries” (LDCs) to near zero by “reducing
fertility” so as to safeguard the economic interests of the United States and
other
industrialized nations in imported mineral resources.
Kissinger observed that the industrialized West was already having to import
significant quantities of aluminum, copper, iron, lead, nickel, tin, uranium,
zinc, chromium, vanadium, magnesium, phosphorous, potassium, cobalt, manganese,
molybdenum, tungsten, titanium,
sulphur, nitrogen, petroleum, and natural gas at high cost. The Kissinger
Report anticipated rising prices as population growth triggered instability in
African nations.
The high-level US government commitment explains the WHO’s monumental
commitment to sterility vaccines. Shaw et al. found 150 research publications
emanating from WHO on various infertility formulations
between 1976 and 2016 with many thousands of citations.
In the years 1993 and 1994, WHO launched antifertility vaccination campaigns in
Nicaragua, Mexico, the Philippines, and Kenya in 1995.
In each country, WHO and local government clinicians
vaccinated women of childbearing age, telling them that the purpose of the WHO immunizations
was to “eliminate maternal and neonatal tetanus.”
A subsequent WHO study of birth control policy, Bryant et al., acknowledged
that WHO’s family planning “services” had involved
routinely deceiving the persons “served”133 with “sterilization procedures being applied without full consent of the
patient.”134 Similarly, a 1992 study titled “Fertility Regulating Vaccines”
published by the UN and WHO Program of Research Training in Human Reproduction, reported “cases of
abuse in family planning programs” dating from the 1970s including:
incentives . . . [Such as] women being sterilized without their
knowledge . . . being enrolled in trials of oral contraceptives or
injectables without . . . consent . . . [and] not [being] informed of
possible side-effects of . . . the intrauterine device (IUD).
The
authors of that WHO report advised their partners against characterizing their
work as “anti-fertility measures for population control,” observing that milder
descriptions like “family planning” and “planned parenthood” were more
palatable for public appetites. Speaking on behalf of the WHO, Bryant et al.
admitted, “It is perhaps more conducive to a rights-based approach to implement
family planning programs in response to the welfare needs of people and
communities rather than in response to international concern for global overpopulation.”
The targeted regions for the WHO tetanus campaigns are principally the same
developing nations that the Kissinger Report targeted. For example, a 2015 news
release by Associated Press announced “[tetanus] immunization campaigns to take
place in Chad, Kenya, and South Sudan by the end of 2015 and contribute toward eliminating [maternal
natal tetanus] in Pakistan and Sudan in 2016, saving the lives of countless
mothers and their newborn babies.”
The Kenya schedule was identical to the one published for the WHO birth-control
conjugate of tetanus toxoid linked to βhCG: five spaced doses of “TT”
vaccine at six-month intervals, which, of course, strongly contrasts with the
published schedule for authentic tetanus immunization schedules.
. . .
In Syria, the
Gates-backed GAVI committed $25 million for polio immunization in 2016. The
following year, the WHO reported that fifty-eight Syrian children had been paralyzed
by the vaccine-derived form of the virus.
Other
vaccine-strain polio outbreaks occurred in China, Egypt, Haiti, and Malaysia. A
study by Oxford’s Clinical Infectious Diseases Periodical found that Gates’s
oral polio vaccine is not only giving kids polio, but
also “seems to be ineffective in stopping polio transmission.” By 2018, the WHO
conceded, 70 percent of global polio cases came from Gates’s vaccines.
As the British
Medical Journal reported in 2012, “the most recent mass polio vaccination
programs [in India], fueled by the Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation, resulted in
increased cases [of polio].”
In an
interview with NPR, professor of microbiology Raul Andino said, “It’s actually
an interesting conundrum. The very tool you are using for polio eradication is
causing the problem.”
Dr. Henderson
argued that Gates’ futile campaign would strip money from other areas of need,
forcing nations to prioritize polio immunization at the expense of other public
health investments. Arthur Caplan, an eminent bioethicist and a polio vaccine
fanatic who himself suffered from polio as a child, also criticized Gates’s
obsession with polio eradication, pointing out that “government budgets and
resources in poor nations are diverted from other far more pressing local
problems to try and capture the last marginal cases.” Donald Henderson observes
that only Western nations (and billionaires like Gates) consider eliminating
the disease as a priority. Polio kills far fewer people in developing regions
than scourges such as malaria, TB, malnutrition, and the greatest killer:
dysentery from deficient water supplies. When Gates first floated his dream of
eradicating polio, developing nations feared a diversion of resources towards
an area where the money was least warranted.
“When you’re
doing polio, you’re not doing other things,” Henderson says. “At least through
2011, in several countries—Nigeria, India, and Pakistan—they were giving polio caccines.”
“In 2012, there were only 223 reported cases of polio worldwide. . . . By any
measure, polio is not one of the world’s greatest killers. Road accidents, for example,
kill about 1.25 million people each year. Measles kills about 150,000 children
each year.” “A number of villagers say,
‘What is polio? We’ve never seen it—why are we worried about it?’”
Rather than
provoking reevaluation, Henderson’s concern seems to infuriate Gates. “I’ve got
to get my D. A. Henderson response down better,” Gates mumbled to one of his
aides in 2011 after the New York Times editorial board interviewed him during
his transglobal trek soliciting rich and poor governments to ratchet up their
commitment to his polio enterprise. A reporter overheard and reported Gates’s
whispered comment. That response suggests that he is aware of the criticism by the man most knowledgeable about eradicating
diseases. Instead of integrating Henderson’s critique into his strategy or
executing a mid-course correction, Gates treated Henderson’s caveats as a marketing
challenge and lumbered onward. His imperviousness to self-assessment allows him
to treat the hundreds of thousands of casualties of his policies as acceptable
collateral damage in his self-serving schemes for humanity.
Gates’
strategic investments have made him immune to criticism by the media and the
scientific community, and so, despite these atrocities, the Gates Foundation
steers WHO like a rogue destroyer floundering forward full speed ahead through the mayhem,
and the carnage of dead and paralyzed children whose ruined lives bob in their
wake. In 2020, the BMGF boasted that the WHO is now providing “unprecedented
levels of technical assistance” for polio vaccination campaigns in Nigeria,
Pakistan, and Afghanistan.(pp.329-343)
. . .
Before its
Indian debut, Bhutan, Sri Lanka, Pakistan, and Vietnam previewed the
pentavalent jab. In each of these countries, unexplained deaths followed
immunization. Bhutan suspended the immunization program in October 2009 after
five cases of encephalopathy/encephalitis
occurred following the vaccine. WHO persuaded health officials to resume the
program, insisting that viral meningoencephalitis caused the deaths. Bhutan
obeyed and four infants died. Bhutan no longer uses the pentavalent vaccine.
The director of Public Health, Dr. Ugen Dophu, observes that there have been no
more cases of meningoencephalitis among infants after the vaccine was withdrawn.
Sri Lanka unleashed the pentavalent vaccine in January 2008 and then suspended
the program four months later after five babies died. Under pressure from WHO,
Sri Lanka reintroduced the vaccine in 2010. Between 2010 and 2012, there were
fourteen additional deaths following the vaccine, making the total number of
deaths in Sri Lanka nineteen.
Vietnam introduced the pentavalent jab in June 2010 and suspended the jab in
May 2013, after twenty-seven infant deaths.
The experience in Pakistan was similar, including at least three reported
deaths. India introduced pentavalent vaccine in December 2011. Up to the first
quarter of 2013, health officials reported eighty-three
serious Adverse Events Following Immunization (AEFI). Twenty-one babies
have died in India following immunization with the pentavalent vaccine.
Gates and WHO
simply trivialize the deaths as sad coincidences or collateral damage. The
vaccine has effectively reduced the incidence of Hib disease in India. However,
there has been a proportionate increase in non-Hib strains of H. influenzae,
including non-serotypable
strains, causing invasive disease in the post-Hib vaccine era. As usual, there
was no accounting.
This is only
one of many examples of the Gates Foundation prioritizing the mandate for
high-cost vaccines in the national immunization programs that Bill Gates effectively
controls. Putting aside questions about net costs and benefits from these
dangerous jabs, McGoey agrees with Puliyel that the diversion of sanitation and
nutrition money is also deadly: “The problem is that by prioritizing the
delivery of expensive vaccines, other proven interventions lose out.”
Real-world
evidence, including his investments in pharmaceutical, petroleum, chemical, and
GMO, processed, and synthetic food, suggests that Gates’ obsession with vaccines
does not evince any genuine commitment to healthy populations. According to Amy
Goodman, Gates owns investments in sixty-nine of the world’s worst-polluting companies.203 His
single-minded obsession with vaccines seems to serve his impulse to monetize
his charity and to achieve monopoly control over global public health policy.
His strategies and corporate alliances in the food, public health, and
education sectors may also reflect messianic conviction that he is ordained to
save the world with technology, top-down centralized cookie-cutter solutions to
complex human problems, and a godlike willingness to experiment with the lives
of lesser humans.
And Gates’
vaccine cartel has amassed Midas-like riches. Early in 2021, a TV interviewer,
Becky Quick, observed that Gates had spent $10 billion on vaccines over the
past two decades and asked Gates, “You’ve figured out the return on investment
for that and it kind of stunned me. Can you walk us through the math?” Gates
responded: “We see a phenomenal track record . . . there’s been over a 20-to-1
return. So if you just looked at the economic benefits, that’s
a pretty strong number.” The interviewer pressed him: “If you had put that
money into an S&P 500 and reinvested the dividends, you’d come up with
something like $17 billion dollars, but you think it’s
$200 billion dollars.” Gates continued: “Here, yeah,” hastening to add that
“helping young children live, get the right nutrition, contribute to their countries, that has a payback that goes beyond any typical
financial return.”204
The key to it
all, he added, is “Having that big portfolio.”
And the key
to much of that portfolio is having Anthony Fauci.(pp.
348-349)
Chapter 11: Hyping Phony Epidemics: “Crying
Wolf”…357
“Governments do like epidemics, just the same way
as they like war,
really. It’s a chance to impose their will on us and get us all scared so
that we huddle together and do what we’re told.”
—Dr. Damien Downing, President, British Society of Ecological
Medicine (Al Jazeera, 2009)
“Fear is a market. To instill fear in people also
has advantages. Not
only in terms of drug use. Anxiety-driven people are easier to rule.”
—Gerd Gogerenzer, Director Emeritus at the Max Planck Institute for
Educational Research (Torsten Engelbrecht,Virus Mania,
2021)
In 1906, infectious disease
caused a third of all annual deaths in the United States, and 800–1000 of every
100,000 Americans died of infectious disease. By 1976, fewer than fifty
Americans per hundred thousand died of infectious diseases, and CDC and NIAID
were under extreme pressure to justify their budgets. Hyping pandemics became
an institutional strategy in both agencies. Pharmaceutical companies and
international health agencies, banking and military contractors soon found
purchase in the ecosystem, and random pandemics discovered their own
self-perpetuating rationale. Dr. Fauci’s critics chide him for routinely
exaggerating—and even concocting—global disease outbreaks to hype pandemic
panic, elevate the biosecurity agenda, boost agency funding, promote profitable
vaccines for his pharma partners, and magnify his own power. The historical
record supports these charges.
1976 Swine Flu.
As chief of the NIAID’s Clinical Physiology Section of the Laboratory of
Clinical Investigation, Dr. Fauci was, in 1976, a frontline spectator during
the NIH’s bogus swine flu pandemic. That year, a soldier at Fort Dix died of a lung ailment following a
forced march. Army physicians sent some samples to CDC, which identified the
malady as a swine flu. Dr. Fauci’s NIAID boss, Richard Krause (who Dr. Fauci
would shortly replace), labored with his CDC counterpart, David Sencer, to
spread terror of a catastrophic pandemic and initiate public demand for a vaccine.
The NIAID chief convened in-house strategy sessions with Merck’s iconic vaccine
developer Maurice Hilleman and other immunization industry nabobs. Congressional
investigators subsequently landed the notes from those consultations, in which
Dr. Hilleman candidly confesses that the resulting vaccine “had nothing to do with science and everything to do with politics.” In the August 2020 Rolling
Stone, Gerald Posner, author of Pharma: Greed, Lies, and the Poisoning of
America, recounted how Merck and other manufacturers utilized their secret
meeting with the regulators to hatch a scheme that would guarantee industry profits while shielding Pharma from liability. This innovation—now a
persistent feature of Big Pharma’s business model—turned out to be carte blanche for negligent and even criminal behavior.
Pharma and NIAID told Congress,
the White House, and the public that the Fort Dix swine flu was the same strain
responsible for the 1918 Spanish flu pandemic, which, they warned, had killed
50 million people worldwide. They were lying; scientists at Fort Dix, the CDC,
and HHS knew that H1N1 was an ordinary pig virus posing no risk for humans. Nevertheless,
NIAID conducted a hard-sell campaign warning of one million deaths in the
United States. Working with the pharmaceutical companies, NIAID, CDC, and Merck
persuaded incoming president Gerald Ford to sign a bill appropriating $135
million for vaccine manufacturers to inoculate 140 million Americans against the
pestilence.
At the behest of federal
regulators, Ford appeared on TV urging all Americans to get vaccinated. Ford’s
obligatory references to the 1918 Spanish flu mass fatalities inspired some 50 million US citizens to hotfoot it to their local health center for
injections of hastily concocted, shoddily tested, zero-liability vaccines that
HHS and Merck conspired to rush to market. CDC director David Sencer set up a
swine flu “war room” to bolster public fear amongst an enthused media. The
government launched a full-scale promotional campaign, including terrifying TV
commercials depicting remorseful patients who dodged their vaccination and
suffered serious illness. A CDC press release claimed that popular TV star Mary
Tyler Moore had taken the jab. Moore told 60 Minutes she had avoided the shot
due to her concerns about side effects. She said that she and her doctor were
very happy she didn’t get it.
In the end, the actual number of
pandemic swine flu casualties in 1976 was not 1 million, but one. Dr. Harvey Fineberg,
who authored the government’s 1978 comprehensive postmortem of NIAID’s response
to that fake pandemic, told the WHO Bulletin: “In ’76, the virus was detected
in a single military installation, at Fort Dix, New Jersey. In the ensuing
weeks and months, not one related swine flu case was reported elsewhere in New Jersey,
the USA or anywhere else in the world. . . . At the same time, political
decision-makers consistently thought that the scientists were giving them no
choice but to go ahead with a mass immunization program.”
NIH’s influenza and flu vaccine
expert senior bacteriologist and virologist Dr. John Anthony Morris informed
his HHS bosses that the flu scare was a farce and that NIAID’s campaign was a
boondoggle to promote a dangerous and ineffective flu vaccine for a greedy
industry. Dr. Morris had worked for thirty-six years at federal public health agencies
beginning in 1940. His office, at the time of the 1976 “outbreak,” was a few
doors down the hall from Tony Fauci’s. Morris served as the government’s chief vaccine officer and led
research on the flu and flu vaccines for the Bureau of Biologics Standards
(BBS) at NIH and later at FDA. Morris enjoyed a distinguished career researching
viral respiratory diseases. When Dr. Morris protested the fraud, his direct
superior ordered him to stand down, advising Morris “not to talk about this.”
His NIH bosses threatened Dr. Morris with loss of employment
and professional ruin if he failed to keep his mouth shut. When vaccine
recipients began reporting adverse reactions, including Guillain-Barré Syndrome
(GBS), Dr. Morris disobeyed orders. Publicly declaring that there was zero
evidence that the Fort Dix swine flu was contagious to humans, he reiterated,
the vaccine could induce neurological side effects. In response, HHS officials confiscated
Dr. Morris’s research materials, changed the laboratory locks, moved him to a
small room with no telephone, reassigned his laboratory staff, forbade him to see
visitors except with permission, and blocked his efforts to publish his
findings. Finally, after months of threats and petty harassment, HHS fired
Morris for insubordination, citing a long list of drummed-up charges, including
failure to return library books on time.
Over at CDC, scientist Dr.
Michael Hatwick was also warning HHS bigwigs that the flu vaccine could cause widespread
brain injuries.
The 1976 swine flu vaccine was so
fraught with problems that HHS discontinued the jab after vaccinating 49
million Americans. According to news accounts, the incidence of flu was seven
times greater among the vaccinated than the unvaccinated. Furthermore, the vaccine
caused some 500 cases of the degenerative nerve disease Guillain-Barré
Syndrome, 32 deaths, more than 400 paralyzations, and as many as 4,000 other
injuries.
Public health officials pulled
the vaccine. President Ford fired David Sencer.
American taxpayers ended up
paying for the swine fluvaccine coming and going, through guaranteed profits
for Merck at the front end and outlays for piles of lawsuits from vaccine
injury victims on the other side.
The government paid $134 million
for the swine flu vaccine program. Injured plaintiffs filed 1,604 lawsuits. By April
1985, the government had paid out $83,233,714 and spent tens of millions of
dollars adjudicating and processing those claims. In 1987, Dr. Morris testified
In 1977, Dr. Morris instituted a
wrongful dismissal suit. The court overturned all NIH’s charges against him. Subsequently
a grievance committee unanimously found that his supervisors had harassed and
wrongfully terminated Dr. Morris. A group of former FDA and NIH scientists
endorsed Dr. Morris’s criticisms of the agency. The New York Times quoted a
fellow scientist, B. G. Young, who characterized NIH’s reprisals against honest
scientists as “suppression, harassment, and censorship of individual investigators.
. . . I finally came to realize that you either had to compromise yourself or
leave. Morris and (Bernice) Eddy are the real heroes in that place because they stayed and fought. The
others voted with their feet and left.”
Up until his death in July 2014,
Dr. Morris remained an outspoken critic of CDC’s annual flu shot program. In
1979, Dr. Morris told the Washington Post, “It’s a medical rip-off. . . . I
believe the public should have truthful information on the basis of which they
can determine whether or not to take the vaccine. . . . I believe that given
full information, they won’t take the vaccine.” Dr. Morris’s 2014 New York Times
obituary reported his statement, “The producers of these [influenza] vaccines
know they are worthless, but they go on selling them anyway.”
Dr. B. G. Young told the New York
Times that NIH’s industry-dominated culture at the vaccine division had driven
away all the honest regulators—those willing to stand up to pharma. Dr. Fauci,
in contrast, is the rare scientist who lasted fifty years at HHS. He has done
so largely by aligning himself with NIH’s pharma overlords and carrying
industry water.
The same weapons that NIH used to
silence Dr. Morris— enforced isolation, disgrace, prohibiting him from publishing
papers, presenting at conferences, or talking to the press, changing his
laboratory locks to prevent further research—were already pieces of an
established Soviet-style template for silencing dissident scientists at NIH.
The agency first unsheathed those weapons in the 1950s to destroy the career of
its award-winning virologist, Dr. Bernice Eddy, the discoverer of the
poliomyelitis virus—who later found a cancer-causing monkey virus in the Salk and
Sabin polio vaccines. When her research disclosed problems with vaccine safety, NIH officials banned Dr. Eddy from her lab,
changed her office locks, and ordered her to refrain from interviews and
speeches. After silencing Eddy, NIH gave the contaminated vaccine to 99 million baby boomers, who suffered a
tenfold increase in soft tissue cancers, resulting in a public health disaster
that dwarfs the harms of polio. Dr. Fauci and government health regulators
later used these same techniques to muzzle a parade of in-house scientists,
including Dr. Judy Mikovits, NIH contract researcher Dr. Bart Classen, and
CDC’s varicella (chicken pox) vaccine researcher Dr. Gary Goldman, who dared to
tell hard truths about vaccine safety and efficacy.
The 1976 swine flu event was the
first time that the federal government agreed to serve as pharma’s insurer. The
episode taught the public an important lesson: tort immunity incentivizes
dangerous and ineffective vaccines. Industry and the magisterial class learned
an entirely different morale from the tragic episode. In 1986 they made swine
flu vaccine template the model for the National Childhood Vaccine Injury Act,
which shielded all mandated vaccines from liability.
At the dawn of Dr. Fauci’s
career, he learned that both pandemics and fake pandemics provide an
opportunity to expand the bureaucracy’s power and to multiply the wealth
of its pharma partners.(pp.357-360)
. . .
Pandemic Championships.
There is an old saw about a cuckold with a murderous grudge against a lion
tamer but no gumption for homicide. For years, he follows the circus hoping to
be in attendance on that inevitable day when an aggrieved feline turns on the
trainer. When decades of frustrated waiting for divine justice finally exhaust
his patience, he sneaks into the lion tamer’s dressing room to sprinkle pepper
in his wig powder. That evening, the lion sneezes and decapitates its
philandering handler.
The compelling evidence
suggesting that COVID-19 emanated from a Fauci-funded Little Shop of Horrors in
Wuhan, China, raises the ironic possibility that the man whom two US presidents
have charged with leading the global response to the COVID-19 pandemic may be
the same man who spawned it. That strange paradox might cause some to cynically
ponder the logic behind Dr. Fauci’s peculiar decisions to defy President
Obama’s 2014 gain-of-
function moratorium, to dodge NIH’s internal safety review committee, to
launder money to Chinese scientists with military affiliations through a
sketchy bioweapons grifter, to finance criminally reckless experiments minting
souped-up pathogens in a shabby Chinese lab with lax safety protocols. Are we
justified in asking ourselves whether Tony Fauci, after decades of concocting
toothless pandemics, was finally peppering the wig? . . .
[Click link for copy of
original drawing of “Dr. Fauci’s March Madsnezss Bracktology Pics”]
But putting aside Dr. Fauci’s
involvement with Wuhan and his decades of fashioning flop contagions, we must acknowledge
that in 2020, he finally hit the jackpot with COVID-19. Among the more
revealing documents in Dr. Fauci’s June 2021 email dump is a rough schematic (opposite)
that Dr. Fauci signed “Tony F.” depicting a March Madness–style tournament
bracket scoring the pestilential contestants during two decades of mostly phony contagions. COVID-19 finally emerges as champion. The doodle is titled “Dr.
Fauci’s March Madness Bracketology Picks” and dated March 11, 2020. In his
macabre pool, Coronavirus—top-seeded out of the East region—defeats the entire
field that includes his long litany of contrived diseases including smallpox,
chickenpox, bird flu, swine flu, Zika, hepatitis B, smallpox, MERS, and measles. The drawing suggests Dr.
Fauci’s pride in a final, satisfying victory after a long, often-triumphant
career engineering global pandemics:-pp.371-372)
Chapter 12: GERM GAMES/WAR
GAMES: Genesis of the Biosecurity State…378
“Those who would give up essential liberty,
to purchase a little
temporary safety, deserve neither liberty nor safety.”
—Benjamin Franklin
“Many of us are pondering when things will
return to normal. The
short response is: never. Nothing will ever return to the “broken”
sense of normalcy that prevailed prior to the crisis because the
coronavirus pandemic marks a fundamental inflection point in our
global trajectory.”
—Klaus Schwab,The Great Reset (July 2020)
“I want to be straight with you: There will
be no return to the old
normal for the foreseeable future.”
—Tedros Adhanom Ghebreyesus, World Health Organization
Director-General
History of Bioweapons.
The United States began its first large-scale
offensive bioweapons research during World War II in the spring of 1943 on
orders from President Franklin Roosevelt, as a collaboration
between the US military and its pharmaceutical industry partners. Pharma titan
George W.
Merck ran the Pentagon’s offensive bioweapons program while simultaneously
directing his drug manufacturing behemoth. Merck boasted that his team could
deliver biowarfare agents without vast expenditures or constructing huge
facilities. Another advantage of bioweapons, he remarked, was that their
development could proceed under the guise of legitimate medical
research.
The
intelligence agencies were involved in the top secret program from the outset.
George Merck’s hands-on employee, Frank Olson, was an American bacteriologist, biological
warfare scientist, and CIA officer. He worked for the United States Army
Biological Warfare Laboratories (USBWL) at Fort Detrick with Merck and the US
military developing the US bioweapons and psywarfare arsenal. Project Artichoke
was an experimental CIA interrogation program that used psychoactive drugs like
LSD in pursuit of “enhanced” interrogation methods. The project was part of a
larger CIA program exploring approaches for controlling both individuals and
populations. Olson was involved with Project Artichoke with moral misgivings, beginning
in May 1952: after watching a documentary on Protestant reformation leader
Martin Luther, a conscience-stricken Olson informed his bosses he intended to
quit the biowarfare program.
Around the
time of that announcement, Olson’s CIA colleague, Sidney Gottlieb, head of the
CIA’s MKUltra program, covertly dosed him with LSD. A week later, on November
28, 1953, Olson plunged to his death from a window of New York’s Hotel Statler.
The US government first described his death as a suicide, and then as misadventure.
In 1975, the government admitted its guilt in the murder and offered Olson’s
family an out-of-court settlement of $1,250,000, later reduced to $750,000, which they accepted with
an official apology from President Gerald Ford and then-CIA Director William
Colby.
By 1969, the
US bioweapons program had developed weapons of a “nuclear equivalence,”
according to David Franz, who, for twenty-three years, served as commander of
the US Army Medical Research Institute of Infectious Diseases (USAMRIID). The
principal limitation, Franz acknowledged, was the difficulty of managing
bioweapons so as to prevent accidental escape. Ironically, Franz would later
play a key role in the Pentagon/Fauci gain-of-function programs leading up to the COVID-19 pandemic.
It all
ended—seemingly—in late 1969, when President Nixon traveled to Fort Detrick to
announce the closure of America’s bioweapons program for moral and strategic reasons.
America signed the Biological Weapons Convention in 1972—forbidding
development, use, and stockpiling of biological weapons—and mothballed most of
its labs. But the agreement—a supplement to the Geneva Convention—left
thousands of scientists, military contractors, and Pentagon caliphs as stranded
assets yearning for the program’s revival.
The treaty
also included a yawning loophole: it allowed production of anthrax and other
biological warfare agents for vaccine production. The Pentagon and CIA spooks continued
to cultivate bioweapon seed stock. Between 1983 and 1988, Searle
Pharmaceuticals CEO Donald Rumsfeld, acting as Ronald Reagan’s envoy in Iraq,
arranged for the top-secret shipment of tons of chemical and biological armaments,
including anthrax and bubonic plague, to Iraqi President Saddam Hussein, hoping
to reverse his looming defeat by Iran’s million-man army. Ayatollah Khomeini’s victorious
Iranian forces were then routing Saddam in their war over the Persian Gulf. The
Bush administration feared the impact on global oil supplies if Iran prevailed
in that conflict.
The Birth of the Biosecurity Agenda
Following the
collapse of the Soviet Union in 1988–1991, the military-industrial complex
began rummaging about for a more reliable enemy to permanently justify its
hefty share
of the GDP. While most Americans eagerly awaited the ballyhooed “peace
dividend,” Pentagon mandarins and their emporium of contractors may have
considered with dismay that someone else would be spending money that was
rightfully theirs. The peace dividend never materialized. Beginning with the
first World Trade Center bombing in 1993 and culminating in 9/11, Islamic
terrorism replaced the Soviets as the essential adversary in US foreign policy. It may have provided solace to the military and its contractors
that “terrorism” was a more reliable long-term foe than the Soviets. Since
terrorism is a tactic, not a nation, an imprecisely defined “terrorism” had the
allure of an enemy that could never be vanquished. We can imagine the defense
contractors’ relief when Vice President Dick Cheney declared the “Long War”—one,
he promised, would last for generations—with battlegrounds “scattered in more
than 50 nations.”
Military
contractors held tight to their gravy train with the mission of building an
expensive new arsenal of anti-terror technologies. But terrorism had its own
shortfall, namely, the challenge of sustaining public fear sufficient to justify
spending substantial portions of GDP to meet a threat that killed fewer
Americans annually than lightning strikes. By 1999, some farsighted Pentagon
planners were already looking ahead to the more exuberant and sustainable
prosperity that would come with a war on germs.
Most
historians date the nativity of the modern “Biosecurity Agenda” to the October
2001 anthrax attacks. But years earlier, military and medical industrial
complex planners were already conceptualizing biosecurity as a potent strategy
for leveraging potential pandemics or bioterrorism into vast funding increases, and as a device for metamorphosing
America, the world’s exemplary democracy, into a national security state with
global dominance.
Robert Kadlec: “Let The Games Begin”.
Bioweapons
expert Robert P. Kadlec is an American physician and retired Colonel in the
United States Air Force who served as Assistant Secretary of Health and Human Services
for Preparedness and Response from August 2017 until January 2021, and who
managed the COVID-19 crisis during the Trump administration. Second only to his
longtime crony and comrade in arms Anthony Fauci, Robert Kadlec played an
historic leadership role in fomenting the contagious logic that
infectious disease posed a national security threat requiring a militarized
response. Since the 1993 World Trade Center terror attack, Kadlec had been evangelizing
about an imminent anthrax attack that would doom the American way of life. In
the mid-1990s, Kadlec served as part of an elite Air Force operations unit of
UN weapons inspectors fruitlessly hunting the Iraqi desert for Saddam Hussein’s
suspected stores of anthrax and botulism following the first Persian Gulf War.
* * *
At 2:47 in the early morning of February 1, 2020, four hours after his loyal
grantee, virologist Kristian Andersen, informed Dr. Fauci that he and other
leading biologists believed that the genetic sequence responsible for the “furin
cleave” on the virus's “spike protein”—the peculiar structure that allows the
organism to bind tightly to, and infect cells with the ACE-2 receptor—was
highly unlikely to be the product of natural selection, Dr. Anthony Fauci fired a carefully worded email to Kadlec. Dr. Fauci’s other emails from that evening
suggest that he was intensely worried that the Chinese experiments that may
have created this striation in the novel coronavirus would bear his fingerprints.
If Dr. Fauci’s gain-of-function research had indeed minted COVID-19, then
Kadlec would also be implicated. Kadlec served on the small so-called P3CO Committee
charged with approving NIH’s gain-of-function experiments, and it is clear from
Dr. Fauci’s email that the subject was also on Kadlec’s mind. Dr. Fauci
attached an article10 to his email to Kadlec. It was “Bat Lady” Shi Zhengli’s deceitful effort to downplay the laboratory leak hypothesis. “Bob:
This just came out today,” Dr. Fauci told his gain-of-function confederate. “Gives a balanced view.” Subsequent events proved that the author of that article was deliberately lying
to conceal the Wuhan lab’s manipulation of coronavirus pathogens that were
nearly identical to the microbe that caused COVID-19. Both Kadlec and Fauci had
been involved, for over a decade, in promoting and funding these dangerous experiments through NIAID and the
Biomedical Advanced Research and Development Authority (BARDA), the biosecurity
funding agency that Kadlec had helped create, including funneling millions of
dollars in US funding to Zhi, the hapless writer of the exculpatory article.
Dr. Fauci’s email shows these two technocrats, and others, patching together
evidence for the dubious official story that they would tell the world. Over
the next few weeks, Dr. Fauci would pull the reliable old levers that he had
manipulated for decades to transform convenient canards into official
orthodoxies. The
contrived cosmologies he thereby constructed would hold for a full year before
they finally began to unravel.
* * *
Kadlec is a
Dr. Strangelove knockoff with deep ties to spy agencies, Big Pharma, the Pentagon,
and military contractors who profiteer from the spread of bioweapons alarmism.
Intelligence agency historian and journalist Whitney Webb describes Kadlec as a
man “enmeshed in the world of intelligence, military intelligence and corporate
corruption, dutifully fulfilling the vision of his friends in high places and
behind closed doors.” In 1998, Kadlec created an internal strategy paper for
the Pentagon, promoting the development of pandemic pathogens as a stealth
weapon that the Pentagon could deploy against its enemies without leaving
fingerprints:
Biological weapons under the cover of an endemic or
natural disease
occurrence provides an attacker the potential for plausible denial.
Biological warfare’s potential to create significant economic losses
and consequent political instability, coupled with plausible
deniability, exceeds the possibilities of any other human weapon.
* * *
Kadlec, in
1999, organized his paranoia into several “illustrative scenarios” to
demonstrate the United States’ vulnerability to biological attack. In one of
Kadlec’s doomsday fantasies dubbed “Corn Terrorism,” China clandestinely sprays
corn seed blight over the Midwest from commercial airliners. Kadlec warns,
“China gains significant corn market share and tens of billions [of] dollars of
additional profits from their crop,” while leaving the US Corn Belt in ruin.
Another Kadlec scenario, titled “‘Lousy Wine,” envisions “disgruntled European
winemakers” covertly releasing grape lice concealed in cans of pâté to target
California wine producers.
In an April
2001 study for the National Defense University National War College, Kadlec
urgently recommended the creation of a Strategic National Stockpile to warehouse countermeasures
including vaccines and antibiotics, and recommended regulatory changes to
provide for mandatory vaccinations and coercive quarantines in the event of a
pandemic. Those ideas helped win him an appointment as Special Assistant for
Biodefense Planning to President George W. Bush after the post–September 11
anthrax attacks later that same
year. From this sinecure, Kadlec’s fervent lobbying persuaded Congress to
establish a Strategic National Stockpile, whose contents are currently worth $7
billion. Kadlec would come to control purchases for that stockpile, and—following
the lead of his comrades, Bill Gates and Tony Fauci—he would use that power to
enrich his vaccine industry friends and sideline public health. As journalist Alexis
Baden-Mayer observed, “Kadlec created the biodefense industrial complex as we know it. And he rules it like a czar.”
The Bill Gates/Anthony Fauci-Funded Biosecurity:
“Let the War Games Begin”.
In 1999, Dr. Kadlec organized a simulation of a smallpox terrorist attack on US
soil for a joint exercise by the newly formed Johns Hopkins Center for Civilian
Biodefense Strategies and the Department of Health & Human Services (HHS).
The founder of the Center was D.A. Henderson, famed for leading the program that eradicated smallpox in 1977. The
Senior Fellow and cofounder of the Johns Hopkins Center was
a CIA spook and pharmaceutical industry lobbyist named Tara O’Toole. She took over as chief when Henderson
left. The third Center Director was Tom Inglesby, who remains in that role. In
1999, the Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation committed $20 million to Johns Hopkins
to establish the Bill & Melinda Gates Institute for Population and
Reproductive Health For the next two decades, Gates would direct a vast stream
of funding to the enterprise of elevating biosecurity as the national priority. Some of his most visible investments funded a
series of simulations presided over by Inglesby at his Johns Hopkins Center.
Those simulations would make Inglesby the congenial face of biosecurity
paranoia, feed the burgeoning biodefense industry, and help lay the foundation
for the modern security state.
The deal
pipeline from NIH and NIAID to Johns Hopkins —an astonishing $13 billion since
2001—dwarfs Gates’s contributions to the school. But shoddy or perhaps deliberately
obscure reporting makes it nearly impossible to determine how many of these
dollars flowed to Inglesby and his center.
Kadlec’s
simulations, and over a dozen that would succeed it over the next twenty plus
years—many under Bill Gates’s direction—shared common features. None of them emphasized protecting public health by showing Americans how to bolster their
immune systems, to eat well, to lose weight, to exercise, to maintain vitamin D
levels, and to avoid chemical exposure. None of these focused on devising the vital
communications infrastructures to link frontline doctors during a pandemic or
to facilitate the development and refinement of optimal treatment protocols.
None of these dealt seriously with the need to identify off-the-shelf (now known as “repurposed”) therapeutic drugs to
mitigate fatalities and to shorten a pandemic’s duration. None of them
considered ways to isolate the sick and protect the vulnerable—or how to shield
people in nursing homes and other institutions from
infection. None of them questioned the efficacy of masks, lockdowns, and social
distancing in reducing casualties. None of them engaged in soul-searching about
how to preserve constitutional rights during a global pandemic.
Instead, the
simulations war-gamed how to use police powers to detain and quarantine citizens,
how to impose martial law, how to control messaging by deploying propaganda,
how to employ censorship to silence dissent, and how to mandate masks,
lockdowns, and coercive vaccinations and conduct track-and-trace surveillance among
potentially reluctant populations.
“Coercion
should be the last strategy to consider in a pandemic,” remarked physician and
biological warfare expert Meryl Nass, MD. “If you have a remedy that works, people
will flock to get it. It’s troubling that the first and only option was
creating a police state.”
The Still-Unsolved Mystery of the Post-9/11 Anthrax Attacks.
Contemporaneously
with Johns Hopkins’ smallpox simulation, the Pentagon launched a top-secret project
at a former nuclear weapons site in the Nevada desert to test the feasibility
of building a small anthrax production facility using off-the-shelf equipment
easily available in hardware stores and biological supply catalogs. Code-named Project
Bacchus, a small cohort of faux terrorists—military weapons experts—succeeded
in producing a few pounds of anthrax. Two years after the Pentagon’s Nevada anthrax project, someone
associated with the United States Army mounted a far-reaching campaign of
sending anthrax to members of Congress and key media figures, officially launching
the “Biosecurity Era.”
In the light
of subsequent events, we cannot exclude the possibility that someone in our
government carried out a false flag attack against Americans as a provocation
for some larger agenda. This is not an outlandish conspiracy theory. During my
uncle’s presidential administration, the Joint Chiefs of Staff submitted a
plan— termed Operation Northwoods—proposing false flag attacks, including mass murders
of random American citizens, to justify an invasion of Cuba. My uncle reacted
with horror to Joint Chief Chairman Lyman Lemnitzer’s Northwoods briefing pitch
and abruptly walked out of the presentation. “And they call us the human race,”
he remarked to his secretary of state, Dean Rusk.
US
intelligence agencies and military industrial complex insiders initially (and
ultimately wrongly) blamed the 2001 anthrax letter attacks on Saddam Hussein or
al-Qaeda and later used similarly incorrect pretexts to launch a war against
Iraq. The mailing of anthrax introduced Americans to a new enemy more
frightening than garden-variety terrorism. While terrorists could destroy key
buildings and airliners, the biosecurity narrative warns that pathogens could
enter any American home and invisibly slay its occupants. Germs, therefore,
easily outgunned al-Qaeda as a reliable wellspring of terror. This was the
lesson Kadlec had been broadcasting for five years. The delivery of anthrax through the mail
brought home his jeremiads. By 2020, biosecurity would altogether eclipse
Islamic terrorism as the spear tip of US military and foreign policy. The topic
of “infectious diseases” suddenly became the
most effective way to open government pockets.(pp.378-383)
. . .
The CIA Dips In Its Toe.
The CIA had a long, sordid history of secretly promoting the US bioweapons
program. One of the agency’s first projects was establishing a network of
so-called “ratlines” that Army intelligence officers used to smuggle some 1,600
chemicals and bioweapons and WMD experts—many of them Nazi Party kingpins and
notorious war criminals—out of the reach of the Allies’ Nuremberg prosecutors
following World War II. The directors of a notorious operation, code-named
Paperclip, provided these researchers with new identities and put them to work
developing US germ warfare capacity at Ft. Detrick and elsewhere even after 1972. As late as 1997, the CIA defied the Bioweapons Treaty to launch a
top-secret—and highly illegal—effort to create a doomsday “bacteria bomblet.”
The CIA
officially made its open debut in the biosecurity racket in 2004, with its
launch of Argus, a project that monitors biological, terrorist, and pandemic
threats in 178 nations. CIA operative and pediatrician Jim Wilson set up the
program at Georgetown University with funding from DHS and the Intelligence
Innovation Center to create and implement global foreign biological event
detection and tracking capability, capable of assessing millions of pieces of
information about social behavior daily and to train government officials in
pandemic preparedness. One of the key figures in this global surveillance
effort was CIA
officer Dr. Michael Callahan.
Dr. Michael
Callahan is one of the biggest names in bioweapons research. Dr. Callahan ran a
biosecurity program for the former CIA surrogate USAID before serving as
Director of DARPA’s bioweapons research program. At DARPA, he competed to outdo
NIH in laundering money through Peter Daszak’s EcoHealth Alliance to perform
bioweapons research, including at the Wuhan lab.
And as DARPA
director, Callahan launched the PREDICT project in 2009 following Jeremy
Farrar’s fake bird flu pandemic. PREDICT appeared to be a reincarnation of the CIA’s
Argus project under the cover of USAID. PREDICT is the largest single source of
funding to Daszak, with a $3.4 million subgrant routed through the University
of California (2015–2020). PREDICT became the largest funder of
gain-of-function studies and served as the principal funding vehicle through
which the gain-of-function cartel evaded Barack Obama’s 2014 presidential
moratorium.
When, during
the height of the presidential gain-of-function moratorium, Ralph Baric and the
UTMB lab’s Vineet Menachery brazenly
published their alarming 2015 study—describing their reckless experiments to
breed pandemic bat coronaviruses that could spread via respiratory droplets in
humanized mice—they omitted mentioning, in their initial online version of the
article, that one of the funding sources was USAID-EPT-PREDICT. Apparently hoping
to cover its tracks, PREDICT hadlaundered its grant through Peter Daszak’s
EcoHealth Alliance.
USAID’s
PREDICT program boasts that it has identified almost a thousand new viruses,
including a new strain of Ebola, and trained some 5,000 people. In October
2019, not long before COVID-19 emerged, USAID abruptly ceased funding PREDICT, a decision
bemoaned by Daszak in theNew York Times as “definitel y a loss.”
Callahan had
a chummy relationship with Daszak, with whom he coauthored several articles—including
throughout the
gain-of-function moratorium. In April 2015, for example, the names of Michael V. Callahan and Peter Daszak appeared as
coauthors on a paper published in theVirology Journal and titled “Diversity of
Coronavirus in Bats
from Eastern Thailand.”
Callahan was
well aware that he and his confederates were toying with fire. In 2005,
Callahan testified before Congress as he was moving into his new office at
DARPA. He concluded the hearing
with a chilling warning about the nation’s new commitment to
Janus-faced gain-of-function science that Drs. Fauci, Robert Kadlec, Callahan
himself,
and many others would proceed to blithely ignore:
the dark science of biological weapon design
and manufacture
parallels that of the health sciences and the cross mixed disciplines
of modern technology. Potential advances in biological weapon
lethality will in part be the byproduct of peaceful scientific progress.
So, until the time when there are no more terrorists, the US
Government and the American people will depend on the scientific
leaders of their field to identify any potential dark side aspect to
every achievement.
Even after leaving DARPA and USAID, Callahan periodically boasted of his
continuing influence over US pandemic response policies at the highest levels
of government. He
On January 4,
2020, Callahan called Dr. Robert Malone from China just as the coronavirus
began taking its first wave of casualties. Malone, a former contractor to the
US Army Medical Research Institute of Infectious Diseases and the chief medical
officer at Alchem Laboratories, is the inventor of the mRNA vaccine technology
platform. Malone first met Callahan in 2009 through Malone’s sometime business
partner, Daryl Galloway, a CIA officer who formerly served in the US Navy and
at one point held the post of director of JSTO in the Defense Threat Reduction Agency.
To Malone, Galloway introduced Callahan as a fellow CIA officer. During his
January 4 phone call, Callahan told Malone that he was just outside Wuhan. Malone
assumed that Callahan was visiting China under cover of his Harvard and
Massachusetts General Hospital appointments. Callahan told Malone that he had
been treating “hundreds” of COVID-19 patients. Callahan subsequently described to National
Geographic how he had pored through thousands of case studies at the outbreak’s
epicenter. He giddily reported his amazement at the virus’s “magnificent
infectivity,” and its capacity to explode “like a silent smart bomb in your
community.”91 Callahan later confessed to Malone that he lacked authority to be
in Wuhan and had escaped by boat when the government imposed its quarantine.
Callahan repeated parts of this story to Brendan Borrell, a writer for Science. Later, DTRA scientist Davis Hone, a GS15 officer, warned Malone to
stop talking about Callahan, saying that “We had no military personnel in Wuhan at
the time of the outbreak and Michael was lying about his presence.” Malone told
me, “That would mean that Michael also lied to Brendan Borrell.” On leaving
China, Callahan returned to Washington to brief federal officials and then went
directly to work as a “special adviser” to Robert Kadlec, managing the
government’s response to the coronavirus.(pp.395-397)
. . .
Laying Pipe for
Totalitarianism.
Following the success of the SPARS simulation, Gates projected a
progressively darker and more martial tone and stepped up his declarations
about the need for authoritarian coercion to cinch compliance with vaccination against
the impending pandemic.
On April 18,
2018, Gates delivered a speech at the Malaria Summit in London, warning that a
deadly new disease could arise within a decade, taking the world “by surprise,”
spreading globally and killing tens of millions. Hinting at the need for
increased coordination between health officials and militaries, Gates reiterated: “The world needs to prepare
for pandemics in the same serious way it prepares for war.” Gates’s simulations
invoke the concept of “total war,” meaning the mobilization of entire populations,
the sacrifice of global economies, and the obliteration of democratic
institutions and civil rights.
Appreciating
the challenges of imposing tyrannical controls in a democracy, Gates
increasingly focused his efforts on enrolling critical allies in Big Tech and
the military.
On April 27,
Gates told the Washington Post that he had warned President Trump about
“the increasing risk of a bioterrorism attack.” Emphasizing his frequent
contacts with the president and military advisers, he publicly disclosed having
regular meetings with H. R. McMaster, Trump’s former national security advisor.
Gates was
simultaneously building bridges with social media tycoons, including Amazon’s
Jeff Bezos, whose support he would need for his master plan. Like all totalitarian
capers, Gates’ gambit would require some book burning, and Bezos would be there
to oblige. Beginning in March 2020, Amazon would outright ban or throttle the delivery of
entire categories of books and videos that questioned official
orthodoxies—including the scientific basis for the lockdown that would multiply
Bezos’s wealth by tens of billions. In the finest Operation Mockingbird
tradition, Bezos’s Washington Post also pitched in, including a shrill
yet adoring propaganda tract under the headline “Bill Gates calls on US to lead
fight against a pandemic that could kill 33 million.” That month Gates
announced a $12 million Grand Challenge, in partnership with the
family of Google’s cofounder Larry Page, to accelerate developing a universal
flu vaccine. Google’s parent company,
Alphabet, was already heavily investing in vaccine manufacturing start-ups and
had signed a $76 million partnership with GlaxoSmithKline. Apparently
anticipating rich returns to Big Tech from the lockdown he would orchestrate,
Gates was, by then, among the largest shareholders of Amazon, Google, Facebook,
and, of course, Microsoft.
The day after
the Post story ran, a board member of the EcoHealth Alliance emailed
zoologist and bioweapons expert Peter Daszak: “Any connections with Bill Gates
we could [re]-activate given this perfect alignment in mission?”
Daszak
responded: “re: gates and google—we have good connections at both orgs . . .”
We’ll definitely be reaching out to them again. . . . Ever since the Ebola
outbreak [G]ates [foundation] are now getting more into pandemic preparedness.”
Daszak, at
that juncture, was acting as a conduit through which Tony Fauci, Robert Kadlec,
the Pentagon (DARPA), and USAID—formerly a CIA cover and nowadays reporting to
the National Security Council—were laundering grants to fund gain-of-function
experiments, including at the Wuhan Institute of Virology Biosafety Lab. In 2018, the French
government had warned US government officials that the Wuhan lab, which the
French helped build, was shoddily maintained and inadequately staffed and
secured. For example, the French construction company, bioMérieux, which built
the lab, had neglected to properly complete the negative airflow system—a
critical piece of infrastructure to prevent the escape of viruses deliberately enhanced to create pandemics. Dr. Fauci ignored the warning.
When in May
2021 I emailed bioMérieux’s ex-CEO (2007–2011), Stéphane Bancel, to ask him if
he knew that his company had violated its contract to provide a functional
system, he did not reply. Bancel by that time was CEO of Moderna and a partner
of Bill Gates and Tony Fauci, operating a company that would be the primary beneficiary of the lab
leak, quickly making Bancel’s 9 percent stake worth over $1 billion and
counting. In March 2019, eight months before COVID-19 began circulating,
Bancel had reapplied for a patent for an mRNA technology for Moderna’s new
vaccine. The US patent office had previously rejected his application. But this
time he approached the patent office with special urgency, expressing “a
concern for reemergence or a deliberate release of the SARS coronavirus.”
Between Germ
Game simulations, Gates continued his barnstorming tour laying pipe for mass
panic and authoritarian rule. At the annual Shattuck Lecture on April 27, 2018,
in Boston, he warned: “We can’t predict when, but given the continual emergence
of new pathogens, the increasing risk of a bioterror attack, and how connected our
world is through air travel, there is a significant probability of a large and
lethal, modern-day pandemic occurring in our lifetimes.” Biological weapons of mass destruction, he warned,
had “become easier to create in the lab.” Gates went on to add that “we are
supporting efforts by others, including the National Institute of Allergy and
Infectious Diseases, whose vaccine candidate [presumably Moderna] is expected to advance to human safety trials in about a
year.”
Clade X 2018.
Then, on May 15, 2018, inside the darkened ballroom
of Washington’s Mandarin Oriental Hotel, foreboding military music introduced
another “pandemic/biowarfare preparation exercise” hosted by the Johns Hopkins
Center for Health Security (formerly the Hopkins Population Center, which Gates
and NIH fund). The daylong event, dubbed Clade X, "simulate[d] the response to
a fictitious bioengineered pathogen for which there is no vaccine.” Hoping to reduce world population, an elite
cult released their genetically engineered bug from a Zurich lab. The disease
spreads first to Germany and Venezuela and then to the United States, killing
100 million people globally as “health-care systems collapsed, panic spread,
the US stock market crashed.”
The
simulation included “a series of National Security Council-convened meetings of
ten US government leaders, played by individuals prominent in the fields of
national security or epidemic response.” The exercise emphasized the need for
militarized pandemic responses and explored strategies for controlling media
and social media. It was a training drill to prepare political, bureaucratic,
military, and intelligence officials to support the coup d’état against
American democracy and the US Constitution. Participating were a kitchen
cabinet of former top leaders of the FDA and CDC, as well as a former CIA general
counsel. Playing themselves were ex-Senate Majority Leader Tom Daschle and
Indianapolis Congresswoman Susan Brooks. Daschle, a former Army Intelligence
officer who was among the targets of the 2001 anthrax-laced letters, became a
pharmaceutical industry lobbyist by 2018. Susan Brooks, the so-called “Member from
Eli Lilly,” founded the Congressional Biodefense Caucus. She also introduced a
successful bill in 2015—the Social Media Working Group Act of 2014—to establish
a Social Media Bureau within the Department of Homeland
Security to facilitate censorship of social media during national emergencies.
Another of her bills in 2015 sought to streamline implementation of coercive
vaccination programs by the federal government during pandemics.
Clade X
livestreamed on Facebook before about 150 invited guests, including carefully
selected representatives of major media. The simulation left his adulatory
press quaking with fear. “This mock pandemic killed 150 million people. Next
time it might not be a drill,” Jeff Bezos’sWashington Post headlined. The New
York Post assured readers that “the world is completely unprepared for the next
pandemic.”
As the Post’s
reporter summarized:
The simulation mixed details of past disasters with fictional elements
to force government officials and experts to make the kinds of key
decisions they could face in a real pandemic. It was a tense day. The
exercise was inspired in part by the troubled response to the Ebola
epidemic of 2014. Unlike Ebola, “which spreads through direct
contact and bodily fluids,” this latest “was a flulike respiratory virus,
which would spread far more easily from person to person through
coughing and sneezing . . .”
In the exercise, schools closed, the demand for surgical masks
and respirators far exceeded supply, and hospitals in the United
States were quickly overwhelmed.” Among the “difficult questions”:
“An entry ban on flights from other countries?” “Who should get the
vaccines first?”
It’s noteworthy that none of the Hopkins simulations contemplate the efficacy
of repurposed medications to mitigate or end the pandemic. And none of them
allow for soul-searching about the abolition of constitutional rights and the
wholesale destruction of America’s political and judicial systems in favor of a
tyrannical medical and military junta. None of them recognize that there is no pandemic
exception in the United States Constitution. Instead, they were too busy war-gaming a high-level mutiny against American
democracy.
All of the
Hopkins simulation stories end with the same affirmations: the advisability of
militarized police state response and the dire need for broadly deployable mRNA
vaccines upon which Gates and Fauci had already invested billions of dollars:
“Players underscored the need for the United States to ‘go from bug to drug’
faster.”
And each
simulation highlighted the so-called “need” to quarantine and isolate the
healthy, censor criticism of the Gates/Fauci vaccines and coerce the population
into receiving vaccines rushed into distribution, all in opposition to logic,
common sense, and previous public health practices.
Hopkins
Center Director Tom Inglesby explained that the event’s immediate purpose was
to “provide experiential learning” for new decision makers in the Trump Administration.
Of course, the event’s embedded press corps lauded Gates as the hero of the
day—the beneficent billionaire whose genius, alone, would save us from the murderous contagion.
An adulatory New
Yorker article, “The Terrifying Lessons of a Pandemic Simulation,” giddily
embraced the images of a nation at war with Gates as the general atop his
gleaming white steed: “Philanthropist-in-chief Bill Gates drew on models
developed by the [Gates-funded] Institute for Disease Modeling [IMHE], a
venture founded by his former Microsoft colleague Nathan Myhrvold, to warn
that, at our current state of readiness, roughly thirty-three million people
would die within the first six months of a global pandemic similar to the 1918
flu.” (Gates would deploy his IMHE minions in January 2020 to grotesquely exaggerate
the COVID-19 predicted mortalities—22 million dead in 12 months—to justify Tony
Fauci’s draconian lockdown.)
Where did the
mock virus originate? In this scenario, “someone has genetically modified a
mostly harmless parainfluenza virus to kill,” recounted MIT TechnologyReview.
“The fictional culprit is A Brighter Dawn, a shadowy group promoting the
philosophy that fewer people —a lot fewer—would be a good thing for planet
Earth.” Johns Hopkins pandemic specialist Eric Toner created the scenario after
carrying out “meticulous research to come up with a plausible threat using real virology and epidemiological models. The
result was so realistic that the organizers chose not to present too many
details.”
A clear
strategic objective for Gates and Fauci was the repetition of the message that
a global pandemic was inevitable, that only mandatory vaccines could avert catastrophe,
and that obliteration of civil rights will be required. Most astonishing was
their capacity to mobilize the obliging global media to uncritically swallow and promote these
propositions in complete contradiction of all previously accepted science and
history.
That same
month, PBS’s NewsHour—once revered as the most incorruptible of all US
television media—ran an adoring feature on Dr. Fauci prominently, touting the
need
for a universal flu vaccine in a two-part report on “Why another flu pandemic
is likely just a matter of when.”
PBS cut to a
tour of Fauci’s Vaccine Research Center with Dr. Barney Graham, coinventor of
Moderna’s mRNA vaccine. In the next segment, the PBS reporter asked Dr. Fauci
about “a shot to protect against all known and unknown strains of the [flu] virus.”
Dr. Fauci replied:“Several years ago, I wouldn’t have been able to give you even an approximation
of when that would be, because the science wasn’t giving us the clues that we
could actually do that. Now with these exquisite techniques of structure-based vaccine design, I
think we are in shooting distance.” Dr. Fauci continued, “We have got to be
able to have something that, when a new pandemic virus emerges, we already have
something on the shelf to do something about it, something that you could make and it would be useable so
that, when you stockpile it, it really is a stockpile.”
The show was
functionally an infomercial for Moderna and mRNA vaccines. PBS didn’t mention
that Dr. Fauci’s NIAID had pumped massive funding into Moderna’s vaccine or
that NIAID claimed patent rights and stood to profit handsomely from its
approval. Nor did PBS acknowledge that the Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation had previously given
PBS NewsHour millions of dollars, or that, by 2019, Gates had also bet millions
on Moderna’s mRNA vaccine. Gates owns a substantial equity stake in the company.
In September
2019, the Gates-funded John Hopkins Center for Health Security followed up on
its Clade X event by issuing an eighty-four-page report, “Preparedness for A High-Impact
Respiratory Pathogen Epidemic.” The report focused on the only end point that
seemed to really concern Gates—the Gates/Fauci mRNA vaccine project. If there
was any doubt that pushing mRNA vaccine was the entire purpose of the exercise,
the white paper cleared that up. The Clade X summary called for making the top
priority of all government, media, and biosecurity players the coordinated
drive for: R&D aimed at rapid vaccine development for novel threats and distributed
surge manufacturing. . . . Nucleic acid (RNA and DNA)–
based vaccines are widely seen as highly promising and potentially rapid
vaccine development pathways, though they have not yet broken through with
licensed products. Both Gates and Fauci had already invested such enormous financial resources in
that technology. In this light, the simulations can be interpreted as marketing
and public relations exercises designed to recruit and train political, military,
media, and public health officials to advance their enterprise using
censorship, propaganda, and state-sponsored violence, if necessary. The report
concluded with a revealing warning about biosafety, “particularly for countries
that are funding research with the potential to result in accidents with pathogens
that could initiate high-impact respiratory pandemics.” The report warned that
the possibility of deliberate release “could substantially add to the extraordinary
consequences that would follow a naturally occurring pandemic event with the
same agent. Mass vaccination strategies should be developed and put in place to
increase immediate access.” Put simply, through the medium of this sponsored
report Gates, is saying that we need a rapid mass vaccination strategy in place
to anticipate the accidental or deliberate release of the kind of enhanced
pathogens that his working partner, Dr. Fauci, was funding the development of
in Wuhan, under the pretext of vaccine research. Though Gates’s simulation
highlighted the need for masks and respirators, Gates, Dr. Fauci, and Kadlec ignored
stockpiling these items, and the same for any antiviral drugs that might successfully
treat sick people. Instead, they were laser-focused on next-gen vaccines, on compulsory
administration to healthy uninfected populations, on censorship and other
coercive devices, on constructing and controlling global health agencies, and
on surveillance technologies.
Global Preparedness
Monitoring Board.
Later, in May 2018—with imprimatur from the WHO and the World Bank Group— Gates
created a kind of permanent standing committee called the Global Preparedness Monitoring
Board (GPMB), including some of the most powerful global public health kingpins,
to institutionalize the lessons derived from all these scenario planning
drills. The global committee would serve as the real-life authoritative
collective for imposing rules during the upcoming pandemic. This so-called “independent” monitoring and accountability
body’s purpose was to validate the imposition of police state controls by
global and local political leaders and technocrats, endorsing their efforts to
take the kind of harsh actions that Gates’s
simulation modeled: subduing resistance, ruthlessly censoring dissent,
isolating the healthy, collapsing economies, and compelling vaccination during a projected worldwide health crises. GPMB’s board
includes a pantheon of technocrats whose cumulative global power to dictate global health policy is virtually irresistible: Anthony Fauci; Sir
Jeremy Farrar of Wellcome Trust; Christ Elias of BMGF; China’s CDC director,
George Gao; Russian health minister, Veronika Skvortsova; WHO’s health director, Michael Ryan; its former
director, Gro Harlem Brundtland; its former programming director, Ilona
Kickbusch; and UNICEF’s Henrietta Holsman Fore, who is former director of
USAID, that used to be a reliable CIA front.
In June 2019,
about twenty weeks before the start of the COVID pandemic, Dr. Michael Ryan, executive
director of the WHO’s health emergencies program, summarized the
conclusions of GPMB’s pandemic report, warning that “we are entering a new
phase of high impact epidemics” that would constitute “a new normal” where
governments worldwide would strengthen control and restrict the mobility of
citizens.
Crimson Contagion
2019.
That August—not even ten weeks before the first COVID-19 infections were
reported in Wuhan—a 2019 war game code-named Crimson Contagion capped eight
months of
planning overseen by Robert Kadlec, who was, by then, President Trump’s
Disaster Response Leader. Also involved in this virus war game scenario was
Anthony Fauci representing the NIH, Dr. Robert R. Redfield of the CDC, and HHS Secretary Alex
Azar. The HHS Office of Preparedness and Response teamed with the top spooks at
the National Security Council to lead the four-day nationwide “Functional
Exercise.”
So now
Kadlec—who had, for twenty years, been writing scripts for using a pandemic to
overthrow democracy and curtail constitutional rights—was in a perfect position
to do just that. With this virus simulation, he included all the key players who
would manage what was to become a de facto coup d’état sixty days hence. While
earlier simulations functioned as training drills for high-level political,
military, press, intelligence agency, and regulatory commissars, the 2019
Crimson Contagion simulation functioned as a nationwide crusade to
evangelize state-level health bureaucracies, municipal officials, hospital and
law enforcement agencies across America with the messages developed in the
preceding simulations
Under a veil
of enforced secrecy, organizers staged the Crimson Contagion exercise nationwide
at over 100 centers. “Participation included 19 federal departments and
agencies, 12 key states, 15 tribal nations and pueblos, 74 local health
department and coalition regions, 87 hospitals, and over 100 healthcare and
public health private sector partners.” The simulation scenario envisioned a
“novel influenza” pandemic originating in China labeled H7N9. As with COVID-19,
air travelers rapidly spread the deadly respiratory illness across the globe.
In this
scenario, by the time US health officials first identify the virus in Chicago,
it is already galloping like the Grim Reaper across other metropolitan areas,
forcing the HHS Secretary to declare a national public health emergency. The
WHO delays a month before declaring a pandemic. The multistate, multiregional exercise that took place just months
before the real-world COVID-19 pandemic focused on “critical infrastructure
protection; economic impact; social distancing; scarce resource allocation;
prioritization of vaccines and other counter-measures.” (Again
not including therapeutic medicines.) The Crimson Contagion exercise
achieved eerily accurate forecasting with numbers that precisely predicted the
official casualty data for COVID-19: million forecasted illnesses, 7.7 million
predictedhospitalizations, and 568,000 deaths in the United
States alone.
The draft
report, dated October 19, 2019, and marked “not to be disclosed,” didn’t become
public until the NewYork Times obtained a copy under the Freedom of Information
Act and published a front-page article on March 19, 2020, eight days after the
WHO declared COVID-19 a pandemic. Only under pressure from another FOIA request
did Kadlec’s HHS Office of the Assistant Secretary of Preparedness and Response
release the January 2020 After-Action Crimson Contagion Report the following
September. It is available online here: governmentattic.org/38docs/HHSaarCrimsonContAAR_2020.pdf.
The Times
story contained this paragraph: “The October 2019 report documents that
officials at the Department of Homeland Security and Health and Human Services,
and even at the White House’s National Security Council, were aware of the
potential for a respiratory virus outbreak originating in China to spread
quickly to the United States and overwhelm the nation.”The New York Times
takeaway missed altogether the larger and more significant stories: that the Crimson Contagion’s planners precisely predicted every
element of the COVID-19 pandemic—from the shortage of masks to specific death
numbers—months
before COVID-19 was ever identified as a threat and that their overarching
countermeasure was the preplanned demolition of the American Constitution by a
scrupulously choreographed palace coup.
The Crimson Contagion
draft report complains that existing federal funding sources were insufficient
to combat a pandemic and concluded, predictably, that government officials
needed far more money and far more power: “A significant topic of concern
centered around the inadequacies of existing executive branch and statutory authorities
to provide HHS with the requisite mechanisms to serve successfully as the lead
federal agency in response to an influenza pandemic.” The team noted that “The
group . . . concluded they would soon need to move toward aggressive social distancing,
even at the risk of severe disruption to the nation’s economy and the daily
lives of millions of Americans.” .(pp.417-424)
. . .
Event 201: October 2019.
Under Gates’ direction in mid-October 2019, only two months after Crimson
Contagion and three weeks after US intelligence agencies believe that COVID-19
had begun circulating in Wuhan, the cabal of potentates and institutions that
compose the Biosecurity Cartel began preparing decision makers for the mass eviction of informed critics of the
vaccine industry from social media. That month, Gates personally organized yet another training and signaling exercise for government
biosecurity functionaries. This war game consisted of four
tabletop”
simulations of a worldwide coronavirus pandemic. Participants included a group
of high-ranking kahunas from the World Bank, the World Economic Forum, Bloomberg/Johns
Hopkins University Populations Center, the CDC, various media powerhouses, the
Chinese government, a former CIA/NSA director, vaccine maker Johnson & Johnson, the
globe’s largest pharmaceutical company; finance and biosecurity industry
chieftains, and the president of Edelman, the world’s leading corporate PR firm.
Conspiracy-minded critics dub this cabal the “Deep State.” The World Economic
Forum Director Klaus Schwab has christened their agenda the “Great Reset.”
Event 201 was
a signaling exercise, but it was also, as we shall see, a training run for a
“government in waiting.” Its principals would quickly move into key positions
to run pandemic response a few months later.
At Gates’
direction, the participants role-played members of a Pandemic Control Council,
war-gaming a contagion that serves as pretext for this insurgency against American
democracy. They drilled a retinue of psychological warfare techniques for
controlling official narratives, silencing dissent, forcibly masking large populations, and
leveraging the pandemic to promote mandatory mass vaccinations. Needless to
say, there was little talk of building or fortifying immune systems, existing off-the-shelf
remedies, or off-patent therapeutic drugs and vitamins. Instead, there was
abundant palaver about expanding government’s authoritarian powers, imposing draconian
restrictions, curtailing traditional civil rights, which might include of rights of assembly, free speech, private property, jury
trials, due process, and religious worship, as well as promoting and coercing
the uptake of new, patentable, antiviral drugs and vaccines. The participants
walked through imaginary global coronavirus contagion scenarios that focused on
fear-mongering, blanket censorship, mass propaganda, and police state strategies
culminating in compulsory mass vaccination.
As with the
Clade X simulation, the most trusted Pharma-friendly media attended. Forbes and Bloomberg participated in the exercise, which focused on war-gaming the medical cartel’s censorship initiative. The Bloomberg Foundation is a major
funder of the Johns Hopkins Center. Oddly, Gates later claimed that this
simulation didn’t occur. On April 12, 2020, Gates told BBC, “Now here we are.
We didn’t simulate this, we didn’t practice, so both
the health policies and economic policies, we find ourselves in uncharted
territory.” Unfortunately for that whopper, the videos of the event are still
available across the Internet. They show that Gates and team did indeed simulate health and economic policies.
It’s hard to swallow that Gates had forgotten.
Organizers
billed Event 201 as a vehicle for delineating “areas where public/private partnerships
will be necessary during the response to a severe pandemic in order to diminish large-scale economic and societal consequences.” They reminded
attendees that “experts agree” that it is only a matter of time before one of
these epidemics becomes “global.”
Event 201 was
as close as one could get to a “real-time” simulation. It was a meeting of a
hypothetical Pandemic Emergency Board, in the same week that COVID-19 was already
claiming its first victims in Wuhan. “We’re not sure how big this could get,
but there’s no end in sight,” warns one hypothetical physician in an opening
briefing. Gates’s simulated coronavirus epidemic was far worse than the
authentic COVID-19 outbreak that would hit America just weeks later. The
simulated version caused 65 million deaths at the eighteen-month end point and
global economic collapse lasting up to a decade.251 Compared to the Gates simulation, therefore, the actual COVID-19 crisis is a bit of a dud.
Public health officials claim 2.5 million deaths “attributed to COVID” globally
over 13 months. The death counts from COVID in our real-life COVID-19 predicament are highly
inflated and questionable. Further, the death of 2.5 million must be put in the
context of a global population of 7.8 billion, with around 59 million deaths
expected annually in any event. Event 201’s predictions of decade-long economic
collapse will probably prove more accurate—but only because of the draconian lockdown
promoted by both Gates and Dr. Fauci.
The theme of
Event 201 was that such a crisis would prove an opportunity to promote new
vaccines and tighten information and behavioral controls through propaganda, censorship,
and surveillance. Gates’ script anticipates vast anti-vaccine resistance triggered
by mandates and fanned by Internet posts. (pp.425-426)
. . .
Gates’s Event
201 global pandemic war game quickly demonstrated that it was reaching and
indoctrinating its intended audiences—the globe’s top-level decision makers. A
week after Event 201, presidential aspirant Joe Biden read a Washington Post
article about the follow-up to the Event 201 report coauthored by the Hopkins
Center for Health Security. According to a newly invented Global Health
Security Index assessing 195 countries, “No country —the United States
included—is fully prepared to respond to a deliberate or accidental threat with
the potential to wipe out humanity.” Biden tweeted a
response on October 25, 2019: “We are not prepared for a pandemic. . . We need
leadership that . . . focuses on real threats, and mobilizes the world to stop outbreaks before they reach our shores.”
At the end of
November 2019, Robb Butler—the head of WHO/Europe’s Vaccine Preventable
Diseases and Immunization Program from 2014 to 2018—told the European
Scientific Conference on Applied Infectious Disease Epidemiology that “vaccine
hesitancy” must be tackled and “immunization is a best buy.”
The Triumph of the Military/Intelligence Complex: Intelligence
Agencies and COVID-19.
In November 2020, the British spy agency MI6
announced that its spooks would be surveilling foreigners all over the world
(presumably including Americans) who questioned
official orthodoxies about COVID-19 vaccines. Declaring the launch of an
“offensive cyber-operation to disrupt anti-vaccine propaganda,” the Foreign
Branch hinted that it would henceforth target individuals who asked awkward or impudent
questions about vaccines or questioned official COVID proclamations or
countermeasures. The agency promised to deploy the same arsenal of monitoring
and harassment weaponry and dirty tricks that it formerly reserved for
terrorists. According to The Times, “The spy agency is using a toolkit
developed to tackle disinformation and recruitment peddled by Islamic state.” A
government source assured the paper they weren’t kidding around: “GCHQ has been
told to take out anti-vacciners online and on social media. There are ways they
have used to monitor and disrupt terrorist propaganda.”
Federal law
forbids US spy agencies from spying on or surveilling US citizens, but the
Western intelligence bureaucracies work in collaboration with one another, and the
CIA often deploys European, Israeli, and Canadian agencies as surrogates to
skirt US laws.
In August
2020, after I appeared as a keynote speaker before an estimated crowd of 1.2
million democracy and civil rights advocates from every European nation protesting
COVID restrictions at a Peace and Justice Rally in Berlin, Germany’s domestic
intelligence agency announced that it would begin monitoring the top leaders of the group that
invited me. The spy agency accused COVID protesters of trying to “permanently
undermine trust in state institutions and their representatives,” according to
the news agency AFP. “Now, the definition of terror is so broad,” says former
CIA official Kevin Shipp, “that any mention of COVID vaccines comes under their
purview.”
These were
the first explicit acknowledgments of the pervasive involvement by Western
intelligence agencies in the vaccine enterprise that the global press has long overlooked.
As two decades of Germ Game simulations foreshadowed, US
and foreign clandestine agencies have a secretive but dominating presence in
the COVID-19 pandemic response. Intelligence community alumni and active
officers occupy key positions in the international agencies that promote global
vaccinations. For example, President Biden’s director of USAID is former WHO Ambassador
Samantha Power. Power is an imperialist war hawk who
as President Obama’s National Security Advisor persuaded him to intervene
militarily in Libya. She has
declared that her primary goal at USAID is “to restore US prestige by getting
American-made vaccines ‘into arms’ around the world.” UNICEF’s Director,
Anthony Lake, was President Bill Clinton’s national security advisor and his
nominee to be CIA Director until corruption charges derailed his appointment.
In January 2020, UNICEF telegraphed its brave new embrace of authoritarianism
by cheerleading the Maldives legislature’s passage of a bill
GlaxoSmithKline’s
spinoff, the Wellcome Trust, has played a central role in the marriage of Big
Pharma to the Western spy agencies. From 2015 until October 2020, the Chair of
Wellcome Trust—the UK version of the Gates Foundation—was the former director
general of MI5, Dame Eliza Manningham-Buller, a thirty-five-year counterespionage
veteran who also functioned as official liaison between British and US
intelligence agencies. Anthony Fauci’s emails reveal that Wellcome Trust
Director Sir Jeremy Farrar worked directly with Dr. Fauci to orchestrate the
cover-up of the Wuhan lab leak evidence, assigning a staff of five Wellcome
Trust operatives to manage the fraud.
Dame
Manningham-Buller has served as chair of the Imperial College London since
2011. Anthony Fauci and Western health officials widely cited the Imperial
College’s inaccurate COVID-19 fatality projections—ginned up by the Wellcome
Trust’s notorious pidemiologist,
Neil Ferguson—to justify the draconian global lock-downs. Ferguson’s guileful projections overestimated fatality rates by more than an order of
magnitude. He did the same with mad cow disease and other diseases du jour. MI6
spy Christopher Steele is a leader of the British organization “Independent SAGE,”
a sketchy, yet highly influential collective of social scientists,
psychologists, and professional propagandists who use the news media to
relentlessly pressure the UK government anytime it hesitates to deploy the
flinty authoritarianism needed to achieve “zero COVID.”
Steele is
only one of many former intelligence officers who cheerlead
draconian responses to COVID and applaud the onset of totalitarianism. One of
the early promoters of the marginalization, demonization, and officially
sanctioned abuse of vaccine-hesitant parents is Juliette Kayyem, the former assistant
secretary for Homeland Security under President Obama, and former member of the
Council on Foreign Relations and the National Committee on Terrorism. Kayyem
was forced out of her high-level job at the Washington Post when critics
leaked her involvement with the Israeli spyware company that makes the software system used to track and murder Saudi journalist Jamal Khashoggi. As early as
April 2019, she was editorializing for the Washington Post that parents
who declined measles vaccines for their children should face “isolation, fines,
arrests” and be treated to the same sanctions that government uses against
terrorists and sex offenders. As early
as 1977, Watergate journalist Carl Bernstein documented the CIA’s control over
400 leading American journalists and institutions, including the New York
Times and TIME Magazine. The CIA’s long and pervasive domination of
the Washington Post via Project Mockingbird, beginning with its owners
Katharine and Phil Graham and leading editors and reporters, is well documented.
There is little evidence that its new owner, Jeff Bezos, has pruned away these
corrupting influences. The Post and the Times have been the
leading media cheerleaders for draconian pandemic response. On September 5, Max
Blumenthal—son of frequent Washington Post contributor Sidney
Blumenthal—exposed the Post for publishing a phony “Doctor on the Street
Interview” in which a supposedly typical DC physician called for extrajudicial murder of the vaccine-hesitant parents through medical neglect.
Blumenthal pointed out that the physician was actually the vice president of
Technical Staff at In-Q-Tel.
The CIA and
other intelligence agencies aggressively recruit scientists like Jeremy Farrar,
whose research involves postings in foreign countries. Additionally, it uses
vaccination drives as a cover for broader strategic actions. Between 2011 and
2014, for example, the CIA used the WHO’s Global Eradication Program to conduct fake polio and Hepatitis B
vaccine programs in Pakistan as a way to surreptitiously collect DNA from
individuals in its efforts to track down Osama bin Laden.
These are
only a few of the myriad examples of the closely kept involvements by spy agencies
in treating vaccination as a foreign policy tool and as an instrument of fear,
suppression, and control independent of any genuine health concerns.
* * *
In July 2021,
one year and four months into the misery of the global lockdown, the FAA had to
divert air traffic over a section of the country stretching from the West Coast
to Michigan to make room for the fleets of private jets converging on Sun
Valley, Idaho, for the thirty-eighth annual meeting of the world’s most
exclusive conclave, sometimes called the Summer Camp for Billionaires, or “Mogul
Fest.” The 2021 meeting included Bill Gates, Apple CEO Tim Cook, Mark
Zuckerberg, Amazon founder Jeff Bezos, Mike Bloomberg, Google founders Larry
Price and Sergey Brin, Warren Buffett, Netflix CEO Reed Hastings, Disney Chair
Robert Iger, Viacom/CBS Chair Shari Redstone, and one of the lockdown’s most
influential propagandists, Anderson Cooper, who has acknowledged that he
responded to a CIA recruitment poster while attending Yale and worked an
indeterminate number of summers thereafter in Langley.
All the discussions
at the event were, as usual, closely guarded, but participants acknowledged
conversing about cryptocurrencies and artificial intelligence. This year, the robber barons hosted, as their guest of honor, CIA Director William Joseph
Burns, and by all reports, the mood among the titans was bullish. By that time,
US billionaires were well on their way to increasing their collective wealth by
$3.8 trillion in a single year, while obliterating the American middle class,
which permanently lost about the same amount. These tech and media magnates,
who had magnified their billions from the lockdown, were the same men who had
used their media and social media platforms to censor complaints about the
lockdown, even as it filled their coffers past the bursting point.
Each of these
fat cats had helped grease the skids for the calamitous collapse of America’s
exemplary constitutional democracy. The Bill of Rights was, by then, indefinitely
suspended. The participants of that event had privatized the
public square and then obstructed the free flow of information and open debate—the oxygen and sunlight of democracy.
Their censorship allowed their allies in the technocracy to effect the most
extraordinary curtailment of American constitutional rights in history: closing
churches across the country, shuttering a million businesses without due
process or just compensation, suspending jury trials for corporate malefactors,
passing regulations without constitutionally guaranteed transparency public
hearings or comment, violating privacy through warrantless searches, and
track-and-trace surveillance and abolishing the rights of assembly and association.
After twenty
years of modeling exercises, the CIA—working with medical technocrats like
Anthony Fauci and billionaire Internet tycoons—had pulled off the ultimate coup
d’état: some 250 years after America’s historic revolt against entrenched
oligarchy and authoritarian rule, the American experiment with self-government
was over. The oligarchy was restored, and these gentlemen and their spymasters
had equipped the rising technocracy with new
tools of control unimaginable to King George or to any other tyrant in history.
* * *
COVID-19: A Military Project.
In the councils of government, we must guard
against the acquisition
of unwarranted influence, whether sought or unsought, by the
military-industrial complex. The potential for the disastrous rise of
misplaced power exists and will persist.
We must never let the weight of this
combination endanger our
liberties or democratic processes. We should take nothing for
granted. Only an alert and knowledgeable citizenry can compel the
proper meshing of the huge industrial and military machinery of
defense with our peaceful methods and goals, so that security and
liberty may prosper together.
—Dwight Eisenhower, 1961
With all the preparations for a coordinated military response, with deep
involvement from intelligence agencies, it should come as no surprise that the government’s
COVID-19 response quickly emerged as a military project.
On Sept. 28,
2020, science journalist Nicholas Florko published in STAT a leaked
organizational schematic exposing the $10 billion Operation Warp Speed project
as a highly structured Defense Department campaign with “vast military involvement.”
The byzantine flowchart shows four generals and sixty other military officials
commanding Operation Warp Speed, badly outnumbering civilian health technocrats from HHS,
who represented a mere twenty-nine of the roughly ninety leaders on the chart.
HHS’s Deputy
Chief of Staff for Policy, Paul Mango, told STAT that the Department of Defense
was deeply enmeshed in every aspect of the project, including creating more
than two dozen vaccine pop-up manufacturing plants, airlifting in equipment and raw
materials from across the globe, and erecting cybersecurity and physical
security operations “to ensure an eventual vaccine is guarded very closely from ‘state actors who don’t
want us to be successful in this.’” This paranoid addendum seems like a
pretextual effort to link vaccine-hesitant Americans to sinister foreign governments,
thereby justifying a military and intelligence agency response. It is, in
short, a “conspiracy theory,” albeit an official one. Mango told STAT that Warp
Speed planning and debriefing occurs “in protected rooms used to discuss
classified information.” A senior federal health official told STAT he was
struck by the sight of soldiers in military uniforms ambling about HHS’s
headquarters in downtown Washington, including over 100 soldiers in the HHS
corridors wearing “Desert Storm fatigues.”
Health officials complained to STAT that they found themselves marginalized as
Warp Speed devolved into a partnership between the military and the
pharmaceutical industry, presided over by Robert Kadlec—who, according to
Mango, personally signed off on every business
agreement made by HHS for Operation Warp Speed.
Warp Speed
has secret deals with six major drug companies developing COVID-19 vaccines.
The operation’s chief adviser is Moncef Slaoui, a former GlaxoSmithKline official
who prior to the pandemic served as chairman of Moderna, the Fauci/Kadlec/Gates
collaboration that would be Warp Speed’s primary beneficiary. By characterizing
his post as an “outside contractor,” Slaoui, who holds roughly $10 million in
GSK stock, dodged the application of federal ethics rules. Slaoui has since
promised to donate any increase in the value of his stock.
“The first
person to be fired should be Dr. Slaoui,” Sen. Elizabeth Warren (D-Mass.)
responded at a hearing. “The American people deserve to know that COVID-19
vaccine decisions are based on science, and not on personal greed.”
Dr. Fauci had
direct hands-on involvement with Warp Speed through his employee Larry Corey,
who described himself as an “ex-officio” member of the Warp Speed governance.
Corey runs Dr. Fauci’s COVID-19 prevention network, which transforms HIV
clinical trial networks into Phase 3 COVID-19 clinical trials.
Dr. Fauci was
undaunted by the military takeover of US health policy, applauding the Operation
as a “talent show.” Dr. Fauci told STAT he was untroubled by the dearth of public health experience among Warp Speed’s Pentagon leadership: “If you go
through the organizational boxes of Operation Warp Speed, they’re very, very
impressive.” Tom Inglesby also lauded the military involvement. “There is deep knowledge of
science and on how to manage complex government operations,” said Inglesby.
“It’s clearly operating in a challenging pandemic and political environment,
and we won’t know if we have a safe and effective vaccine until the trials are finished. But it’s a highly competent
group of people working to make it happen.”
HHS secretary
Alex Azar—a former Pharma CEO and lobbyist—and defense secretary Mark Esper
share top billing as the organizational chairs. Slaoui, the project’s formal
civilian leader, and Gen. Gustave Perna serve as Operation Warp Speed’s CEO.
Immediately
beneath Perna and Slaoui are Lieutenant General (Retired) Paul Ostrowski, a
former Special Forces soldier who manages distribution of an eventual vaccine,
and Matt Hepburn, who specializes in futuristic warfare projects for the
Pentagon, including a program to implant high-tech sensors into soldiers to
detect illnesses and for other purposes.
“This should
be a medical and not be a military operation,” Holocaust survivor and medical
ethics advocate Vera Sharav told me. “It’s a public health problem. Why are the
military and the CIA so heavily involved? Why is everything a secret? Why can’t
we know the ingredients of these products, which the taxpayers financed? Why
are all their emails redacted? Why can’t we see the contracts with vaccine
manufacturers? Why are we mandating a treatment with an experimental technology with minimal testing? Since COVID-19 harms fewer than 1 percent, what is the justification for putting
100 percent of the population at risk? We need to recognize that this is a vast
human experiment on all of mankind, with an unproven technology, conducted by
spies and generals primarily trained to kill and not to save lives.” What could
possibly go wrong?(pp.430-435)
The 21 + items below offer a selection of recent articles and essays in the Anglophone social media that will challenge our understanding of the social system and structure of which we are a part. The collective situation which we share should remind us of our interconnectedness and the dire need for us to get our act together, before it is too late.
Sincerely,
Francis McCollum Feeley
--
Professeur
honoraire de l'Université Grenoble-Alpes
Ancien Directeur des Researches
Université de Paris-Nanterre
Director of The Center for the Advanced Study
of American Institutions and Social Movements
(CEIMSA-in-Exile)
The University of California-San Diego
http://www.ceimsa.org
a.
As Russia
heads toward victory after all, Ukraine's imagineers put out fake videos of
Russia "losing"
https://markcrispinmiller.substack.com/p/as-russia-heads-toward-victory-after?utm_source=email&s=r
from Mark Crispin Miller
+
The Dreizin Report - Ukraine War
& Aftermath
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=acRn0yql83U
with Jacob Dreizin
(video,
34:11)
In this video, the Dreizin Report explains
the general principles of breaking a static defensive line, from the perspective
of the advancing Russian and Donetsk/Lugansk forces. However, we start with
some comedy from Foreign Affairs magazine, which shows just how crazy the scene
has gotten here in the USA. (Not mentioned in the video, it turns out the
author of the piece in question is Anders Aslund, one of the architects of the
misguided and catastrophic, economic “shock therapy” in Russia in the early-mid
1990s, which gave us the oligarchs among other problems.)
+
NATO Launches Big
Baltic War Games...”What Could Go Wrong?”
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=TFTD94wIW4k&feature=youtu.be
with Ron Paul
(28:30)
+
Putin's warning. Olaf
Scholz fears Zelensky will invade Russia with German weapons
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Kqoz2pHM5bk
with Alex Christoforou and
Alexander Mercouris
(24:43)
+
Pressure Mounts on Pentagon Over
Lack of Oversight for Ukraine Military Aid
by Dave DeCamp
Interpol warns that the weapons being flooded into Ukraine will
end up in the hands of criminals
===========
b.
Day 100
of the Russia-Ukraine War
https://www.globalresearch.ca/day-100-russo-ukrainian-war/5782533
by William Walter Kay
+
Ukraine
War! What Is It Good For? Part 5 - Transformation
https://off-guardian.org/2022/06/07/ukraine-war-what-is-it-good-for-transformation/
by Iain Davis
+
Watch
"Disappeared! Video Proving U.S. Involvement In
Ukraine Coup
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=o8Z73NHmvVw
with Jimmy Dore
(11:29)
+
Donbass:
Russell Bentley ("Texas") about his first battle and friends he lost
in the battle
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=6wYEJ4rkU3s
with Russell “Texas” Bentley
(video, 13:03)
Militiaman
from the US, Texas, visits the church near the Donetsk airport, now controlled
by the Donetsk People's Republic and talks about the first attacks of the
Ukrainian fascists that he experienced when he joined the militia and about the
destroy of churches in Ukraine. The number of churches destroyed by the Kiev
junta in Donbass as of January 6, 2015, was at least 10; 70 churches were
damaged in shellings. The current number is not yet known. But more than that:
churches get raided by Nazis all over Ukraine. Priests get persecuted. All of
this is a natural extension of fascism. Fascism brings paganism. Supposedly
"pre-Christian" religions of Ukraine get promoted - the Ukrainian
neo-paganism known as "RUN-Vira" ("Native Ukrainian National
Faith"), which attempts to replace Christianity. The most massive attack
against Christianity in the 21st century has started in Ukraine. Christians!
This bell tolls for you. Act. The people of Donbass will rebuild their churches
in any case. But you can help them. "Essence of Time - Donetsk People's
Republic" Television, issue 493 Link to original: https://youtu.be/U4lfcn5wcNk Humanitarian aid for Donbass (Rostov-on-Don):
https://vk.com/svhelpdonbass Essence of Time movement website: http://eot.su Help for the South-East of Ukraine
movement's website: http://vognebroda.net Essence of time group in VK: http://vk.com/eotsu Anti-Misinformation - Civil Resistance: http://vk.com/vognebrodanet
+
Donbass:
The Final Battle - Mariupol - Prisoners, Biolabs
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=jIfXL5Nagy4
with Regis Tremblay and Russell “Texas” Bentley
(video, 32:26)
+
Where
Does Military Aid to Ukraine Comes From
https://www.globalresearch.ca/where-military-aid-ukraine-comes-from/5782469
by Katharina Buchholz
+
Why
America Needs War
https://www.globalresearch.ca/why-america-needs-war/5328631
by Dr. Jacques R. Pauwels
+
Military
Hardware for Ukraine: Who Plans to Supply What?
https://www.globalresearch.ca/military-hardware-ukraine-who-plans-supply-what/5782592
by an D. Walter
+
Are
France and NATO Shipping Depleted Uranium Weaponry Into Ukraine?
https://www.globalresearch.ca/france-nato-shipping-depleted-uranium-weaponry-into-ukraine/5782644
by Freddie Ponton
==========
c.
Scully and Mulder nailed it in 2016!
https://markcrispinmiller.substack.com/p/scully-and-mulder-nailed-it-in-2016?utm_source=email&s=r
from Mark Crispin Miller
A year before Dr.
Fauci predicted the "pandemic" under Trump, "The X-Files"
foretold its use to cull the human race, and crush America
+
Science
versus Scientism (part 1)
https://rwmalonemd.substack.com/p/science-versus-scientism-part-1?utm_source=email&s=r
More root
cause analysis of the COVIDcrisis
+
Science versus Scientism (part
2)
https://rwmalonemd.substack.com/p/science-versus-scientism-part-2?utm_source=email&s=r
+
The Forgotten Side of Medicine
“I
have spent the last year working to document this. It is a lot to take in but I
feel it needs to be said.”
+
Gearing Up for the Big Reveal: HHS Releases FDA Gene
Editing Guidance, May Soon Admit mRNA COVID Shots Are
Actually Gene Therapy Products
by Kevin Hughes (with Stew
Peters and Dr. Jane Ruby
(11:23)
+
Bayer
Head Admits COVID-19 Vaccine Is Gene Therapy
https://www.globalresearch.ca/bayer-head-admits-covid-19-vaccine-gene-therapy/5782481
by Martin Armstrong
+
First
Ever NIH/NIND Study on Vaccine Caused Neurological Injuries
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=9XGpe6MTaFg&feature=youtu.be
(1:06:29)
==========
d.
"Vaccidents"
will happen, everywhere (and not just to the "vaccinated")
https://markcrispinmiller.substack.com/p/vaccidents-will-happen-everywhere?s=r
from Mark Crispin Miller
+
"Vaccidents"
keep spiking all around the world—and "our free press" keeps on
denying that the jabs have anything to do with it
https://markcrispinmiller.substack.com/p/vaccidents-keep-spiking-all-around?s=r
from Mark Crispin Miller
+
‘We're
Dealing With a Criminal Syndicate’, Doctors Send Stark
Warning to Parents…
https://mail.google.com/mail/u/0/#inbox/FMfcgzGpGKgHSdnXVhsCKMHxxjWJwLbX
by Children’s Health Defense
+
First
COVID Vaxx Injury Payout To Canadian Man
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=jsXlwmTW0eE&feature=youtu.be
with Jimmy Dore
(11:45)
+
FDA/Pfizer
Malfeasance in Pfizer Document Dump
https://www.globalresearch.ca/dr-naomi-wolf-on-fdapfizer-malfeasance-in-pfizer-document-dump/5782684
by Naomi Wolf
+
Lipid
Nanoparticle/Modified Gene COVID Injection Is A "Nuclear Bomb" & The SIDS/SADS/MIS-C Deception
with Ryan Cristián
(2:10:21)
+
Study
Finds Athlete Deaths Are 1,700% Higher Than Expected Since COVID-19 Vaccination
Began
+
Zero
Increased Myocarditis Risk For Unvaxed, Ukraine's Fake
News Exposed & "Global Water Security"
with Ryan Cristián
(2:07:11)
+
Selected
Articles: We’re Now in the Last Stage of a Tyrannical
Takeover
https://www.globalresearch.ca/selected-articles-were-now-last-stage-tyrannical-takeover/5782698
+
Pharma
Companies Exposed For Bribing Family Doctors To
Prescribe Drug 50X’s Stronger Than Heroin
by Matt Agorist
===========
e.
“Tyranny
of the Modelers”
https://rwmalonemd.substack.com/p/tyranny-of-the-modelers?utm_source=email&s=r
by Robert W Malone MD, MS
Intersection of Utilitarianism, Geopolitics, Public Health and
Hubris
+
June 3, 2022
“The Defender – Children’s Health Defense”
from Robert F. Kennedy, Jr.
+
June 2, 2022
“The Defender – Children’s Health Defense”
from Robert F. Kennedy, Jr.
+
Humor
Friday Funnies
https://rwmalonemd.substack.com/p/friday-funnies-8bb?utm_source=email&s=r
from Robert Mahone
“It is a choice, but compliance is the only option.”
+
Covida
Commedia
https://off-guardian.org/2022/06/04/covida-commedia/
by John Griffin
+
The Power
of Lies
https://scheerpost.com/2022/06/03/craig-murray-the-power-of-lies/
by Craig Murray
===========
f.
FLASHBACK:
Feudalism 2.0 (2007)
https://www.bitchute.com/video/pMxRq4fbppbT/
with James Corbett
(37 :16)
+
WATCH: 15
Things I’ve Learned in 15 Years
https://off-guardian.org/2022/06/06/watch-15-things-ive-learned-in-15-years/
with James Corbett
(33:06)
+
8
Infamous "Conspiracy Theories” That Turned Out To Be True
https://www.thelastamericanvagabond.com/8-infamous-conspiracy-theories-turned-true/
by Arjun Walia
+
Derrick Broze Interview - WEF's 2022 Davos Meeting Reveals Your Future,
Whether You Like It Or Not
with Ryan Cristián
(1:52:08)
+
Beyond bilderberg(er)'s Civil War
https://www.corbettreport.com/nwnw20220609/
with James Corbett
(25:16)
==========
g.
Palestine
in Pictures
May 2022
https://electronicintifada.net/content/palestine-pictures-may-2022/35576
by The Electronic Intifada
+
The
Ethnic Cleansing of Masafer Yatta: Israel’s New Annexation Strategy in
Palestine
https://www.mintpressnews.com/ethnic-cleansing-masafer-yatta-israel-new-annexation-strategy/281001/
by Ramzy Baroud
+
West
Bank: Harrowing Accounts of Palestinians Shot Dead by Israeli Forces Over
24-hour Period
+
Israel's
Dance of Flags is a Zionist Hate Parade and, by Definition, an Act of War
https://www.mintpressnews.com/israels-dance-flags-zionist-hate-parade/281027/
by Miko Peled
+
Israeli Occupation Forces Kill 5
Palestinians As Tensions Boil
by Robert Inlakesh
+
Israel’s
assaults on public health infrastructure amount to war crimes
by Emily Hacker
+
Canada
Votes Against Healthcare for Palestinians at WHO
Assembly
https://www.globalresearch.ca/canada-votes-against-healthcare-palestinians-who-assembly/5782737
by The New Arab
+
Further |
Battle Tested On Palestinians
https://www.commondreams.org/further/2022/06/04/battle-tested-palestinians
by Abby Zimet
+
Uproar in
Cyprus After Israel Carries Out Military Exercise
Aimed at Lebanon
by The New Arab
+
Lebanon’s Elections And The
Ever-Shifting Narrative Of Western Propaganda
by Robert Inlakesh
+
Why is an Israeli
intelligence-linked company filtering US journalists' emails?
by Lowkey
+
India and
Israel: The Arms Trade in Charts and Numbers
https://www.globalresearch.ca/india-israel-arms-trade-charts-numbers/5782585
by Azad Essa
Israel's
New Racism: The Persecution of African Migrants in the Holy Land
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=dPxv4Aff3IA&feature=youtu.be
by Nation
(10:55)
About 60,000 African migrants have
arrived in Israel since 2006, fleeing unrest in their home countries. But upon
arrival in the ostensibly democratic country, the migrants have faced intense
persecution and have been branded as "infiltrators" by right-wing politicians
and activists.
+
Israel
tells African migrants to leave Jerusalem
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=qvZlh4XuY8w
by Mint
(4:09)
African migrants demonstrated Wednesday outside the Rwandan
embassy in Israel's Herzliya against the Israeli government's policy to deport
African refugees and asylum seekers from Israel to a third country.
+
Selected
Articles: A New War in the Middle East? Israel Military Exercises Simulates
Invasion of Lebanon, War with Hezbollah, and Iran
==========
h.
From
UNESCO Study 11 to UNESCO 2050: Project BEST and the Forty-Year Plan to
Reimagine Education for the Fourth Industrial Revolution
https://unlimitedhangout.com/2021/06/investigative-reports/from-unesco-study-11-to-unesco-2050/
by John Klyczek
+
Silicon
Valley Taking Control of History
https://consortiumnews.com/2022/06/07/caitlin-johnstone-silicon-valley-taking-control-of-history/
by Caitlin Johnstone
+
US
State-Affiliated NewsGuard Targets Consortium News
https://consortiumnews.com/2022/06/02/us-state-affiliated-newsguard-targets-consortium-news/
by Joe Lauria
+
Paul
Mason's covert intelligence-linked plot to destroy The Grayzone exposed
https://thegrayzone.com/2022/06/07/paul-masons-covert-intelligence-grayzone/
by Kit Klarenberg and Max Blumenthal·
+
The
Mysterious Death of Osama bin Laden
by Prof Michel Chossudovsky – July 8, 2013
Who
Was Killed in Abbottabad in May 2011? Osama bin Laden or Someone Else? Pentagon
Ordered Purge of Osama "Death Files" from Data Bank
+
US
Battled World War II Nazis, Today US Side-by-side Ukraine Nazis
https://www.globalresearch.ca/us-battled-ww-ii-nazis-today-us-side-by-side-ukraine/5782550
by Renee Parsons
==========
i.
America’s Role in the Syrian Civil
War
https://www.counterpunch.org/2022/05/22/americas-role-in-the-syrian-civil-war/
by Noam Chomsky - Raghav Kaushik
+
Blowback
to G7 Ban on Russian Oil?
https://www.counterpunch.org/2022/05/25/blowback-to-g7-ban-on-russian-oil/
with Eric Draitser
(39:12)
+
Summit of the Americas or Summit of the United
States of America?
http://www.blackagendareport.com/summit-americas-or-summit-united-states-america
by Bertony Dupont
+
The
People’s Summit for Democracy Offers a Progressive Vision to Counter U.S.
Dominance in the Region
by Sheila Xiao and Manolo De Los Santos
+
Gustavo
Petro Wins in Colombia, 2nd Round Battle Begins
http://www.blackagendareport.com/gustavo-petro-wins-colombia-2nd-round-battle-begins
by Orinoco
Tribune
==========
j.
Is
US/NATO (with WEF help) pushing for a Global South famine?
https://michael-hudson.com/2022/06/is-us-nato-with-wef-help-pushing-for-a-global-south-famine/
by Michael Hudson
+
Globalists
Are Taking Over the Food System — It's Part of Their Plan to Control You
by Children’s Health Defense
+
5 signs
they are CREATING a food crisis
https://off-guardian.org/2022/04/25/5-signs-they-are-creating-a-food-crisis/
by Kit Knightly
It’s no secret that, according to
politicians and the corporate press, “food shortages” and a “food supply
crises” have been on the way for a while now. They have been regularly
predicted for several years.
What’s really strange is that despite its
near-constant incipience, the food shortage never seems to actually arrive and
is always blamed on something new.
As long ago as 2012, “scientists” were
predicting that climate change and a lack of clean water would create “food
shortages” that would “turn the world vegetarian by
2050”.
In 2019, UN “experts” warned that “climate change was
threatening the world’s food supply”.
Later the same year, the UK was warned that
they could expect a food shortage as a result of “post-Brexit chaos”.
+
The
Coming Food Apocalypse: Kit Knightly on the Global Research News Hour
with Kit Knightly
(audio,
59:17)
“Prices are more or less 78% higher than
average in 2021, and this is cracking up the
production side of agriculture. In many regions, farmers simply can’t afford to
bring fertilizers to the farm, or even if they could, the fertilizers are not
available to them…And it’s not just fertilizers, but agrichemicals and fuel as
well. This is a global crisis and it requires a global response.”
- Theo
de Jager,
President of World Farmers Organization
“If you control oil, you control nations.
If you control food, you control people.”
- Henry Kissinger
+
Africa's
Escalating Food Crisis: African Union (AU) Leaders Meet with Russian Government
+
From: Cat McGuire <cat@catmcguire.com>
Date: Jun 10, 2022
Subject: USA-based destroyed food manufacturing plants
An updated list of USA-based
destroyed food manufacturing plants
Holodomor 2.0 (same perpetrators as
1.0)
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
36
37
38
39
40
41
42
43
44
45
46
47
48
49
50
51
52
53
54
55
56
57
58
59
60
61
62
63
64
65
+
“We’re Now in the Last
Stage of a Tyrannical Takeover”
https://www.globalresearch.ca/were-now-last-stage-tyrannical-takeover/5782560
with Naomi Wolf
(1:06:11)
==========
k.
“US
Imperialism is the Greatest Threat to Life on Our Planet”: Mapping US
Imperialism
https://www.globalresearch.ca/selected-articles-were-now-last-stage-tyrannical-takeover/5782698
+
The
Frontman of Empire: How Bono’s “Activism” Serves the Powerful
https://www.mintpressnews.com/frontman-empire-bono-activism-serves-powerful/281017/
by Alan Macleod
+
Le pass sanitaire prolongé dans l'Union
Européenne dès cet été
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=O2bJep6_lts
avec Radio SUD
(10 :03)
+
Labor
Activists Launch New Organization to Challenge AFL-CIO Foreign Policy
by Prof. Kim Scipes
+
Psychopathic
Politicians: Role Models of a “Slave Society”
https://www.globalresearch.ca/psychopathic-politicians-role-models-slave-society/5782625
by Julian Rose
+
The Links
Between Jeffrey Epstein and Bill Gates Explained
https://www.globalresearch.ca/links-between-jeffrey-epstein-bill-gates-explained/5782537
by The Week
+
For Bill
Gates, It’s “Moneypox”: Simulation of Fictitious Monkeypox Virus Pandemic in
March 2021, Goes Live in May 2022
by Prof Michel
Chossudovsky
==========
l.
Pan-Africanism
Yes! U.S. AFRICOM and NATO No!
http://www.blackagendareport.com/pan-africanism-yes-us-africom-and-nato-no
by Abayomi Azikiwe
+
Black
Skin, White Mask
https://covertactionmagazine.com/2022/06/03/black-skin-white-mask/
by Jeremy Kuzmarov
+
Africa,
the Collateral Victim of a Distant Conflict
https://consortiumnews.com/2022/06/05/africa-the-collateral-victim-of-a-distant-conflict/
by Vijay Prashad
+
The Rise
of NATO in Africa
http://www.blackagendareport.com/rise-nato-africa
by Vijay Prashad
==========
m.
Why
Economic Policy = Class Struggle
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Wbk9bKl4L5w
with Richard Wolff
(5:16)
Prof.
Wolff underscores the importance of calling US “economic policy” what it really
is: class struggle. The current inflation, as well as the Federal Reserve’s
choice to raise interest rates, is hurting the working class significantly more
than the employer class. This is class struggle—the 1% vs the 99%—because if
employers struggle economically, they can raise prices while keeping employees’
wages stagnant throughout the inflation. In this struggle, Prof. Wolff reminds
us, there are alternatives the government can do to control the inflation and
we should not be fooled when they say otherwise.
+
These Are
The Biggest US Importers And Exporters
https://www.zerohedge.com/economics/these-are-biggest-us-importers-and-exporters
by Tyler Durden
Which companies are the biggest importers and exporters in
the U.S.?
The
majority of people will know the names of the businesses that ship the most
goods into the country (measured by volume transported on
container ships), but, as Statista's Katharina Buchholz notes, most of the biggest exporters hardly ring a
bell.
+
Goldman Pinpoints
"July/August" Will Be Return Of US West
Coast Port Congestion
by Tyler Durden
U.S. West Coast ports have experienced at
least three months of easing bottlenecks thanks to China's zero-COVID policies,
locking down Shanghai, home to the world's busiest seaport, which slowed
exports to the U.S. The reopening of Shanghai's economy and restarting of
factories will undoubtedly spur an export wave of backlogged goods to the U.S.,
which could spark another round of congestion.
The lingering question is, when will this
tsunami of goods, such as electronics, clothing, and whatever else China makes,
flood U.S. ports? To answer that, Goldman Sachs analyst Jordan Alliger details
in a new Tracking U.S. Supply
Chain Congestion report that "July/August" could be the
start of shipping congestion to reemerge after falling much of this
year.
+
Biden Hikes Medicare Prices and
Funnels Profits to Private Insurers
by Matthew Cunningham-Cook
+
White House
Tells Americans They Have It Better Than Europeans On
Gas Prices
by Steve Watson
+
Biden
White House in search of an off-ramp in Ukraine
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=TrArtFePitA&feature=youtu.be
with Alex Christoforou and Alexander Mercouris
(23:54)
+
Dictator-in-Chief:
The President’s Secret, Unchecked Powers
https://off-guardian.org/2022/06/07/dictator-in-chief-the-presidents-secret-unchecked-powers/
by John & Nisha Whitehead
“Life, liberty, and the pursuit of
happiness have given way to permanent crisis management: to policing the planet
and fighting preventative wars of ideological containment, usually on terrain
chosen by, and favorable to, our enemies. Limited government and constitutional
accountability have been shouldered aside by the kind of imperial presidency
our constitutional system was explicitly designed to prevent.”
- David C. Unger, The Emergency State: America’s Pursuit of Absolute Security
at All Costs
=============
n.
Will
Biden Provoke War with China?
by Patrick Lawrence
+
Bilderberg
Meets in Washington: Bilderberg Does China. An Economic Hurricane is Coming
https://www.globalresearch.ca/bilderberg-does-china/5782525
by Pepe Escobar
+
Black Sea
Geopolitics and Russia's Control of Strategic Waterways: The Kerch Strait and
the Sea of Azov
by Prof Michel Chossudovsky
+
US Wants
to Surround China with Missiles – But Can’t Find Asian Country to Host Them
by Ben Norton
+
The
Indo-Pacific Economic Framework and the Decline of the American Empire
http://www.blackagendareport.com/indo-pacific-economic-framework-and-decline-american-empire
by Danny Haiphong
==========
o.
Wolff
Responds: “Great Replacement Theory - A Critique
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=vzR8aoDQ8W8
with Richard Wolff
(8:51)
+
Censorship and the War
on Black America
http://www.blackagendareport.com/censorship-and-war-black-america
with
Danny Haiphong
(1:03:22)
+
Disinformation Board:
Leaked Documents Expose Agenda Behind DHS ‘Ministry of Truth’
by NEWS WIRE
LEAKED INFORMATION:
They Are Trying To Delete This"
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=RBTi3_GA_fA&feature=youtu.be
with Russell Brand
(13:04)
+
"Plot To Take Down Anti-War Journalists
Exposed!"
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=xmmTI4SHLXE&feature=youtu.be
with Jimmy Dore
(27:50)
+
911 Is a
Joke: Preferring to Shoot Unarmed Blacks, Cops Find It Ain't No
Fun When the Rabbit Has the Gun
by Jon Jeter
+
The
connections between policing and militaristic assault on the world are endless
by Roberto Sirvent and Julian Akil Rose
==========
p.
New
Evidence Implicates CIA, LAPD, FBI and Mafia as Plotters in Elaborate “Hit”
Plan to Prevent RFK From Ever Reaching White House
by Jeremy Kuzmarov
+
THE
INFILTRATION OF WHAT YOU'D NEVER EXPECT...The Game's Afoot
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Swd0atfQ7DA
with reallgraceful
(18:18)
+
US
State-Affiliated NewsGuard Targets Consortium News
https://consortiumnews.com/2022/06/02/us-state-affiliated-newsguard-targets-consortium-news/
by Joe Lauria
The Pentagon and State Dept.-linked
outfit, with an ex-N.S.A. and C.I.A. director on its board, is accusing Consortium News of publishing “false
content” on Ukraine, reports
+
Serbia Resists US-led Bullying
https://www.counterpunch.org/2022/05/24/serbia-resists-us-led-bullying/
by Gregory Elich
+
Boris’
days as UK PM are numbered, Putin regime change plan backfires
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=GSwOK8jT8Jo
with Alex Christoforou and Alexander Mercouris
(23:50)
==========
q.
Russian Defense Minister Shoigu says land bridge
complete, which may signal phase 3 Odessa
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=guWCJDXfKis
with Alex Christoforou and Alexander Mercouris
(22:15)
+
A new generation of US-trained extremists is
fighting Russia. Are we prepared for the blowback?
https://thegrayzone.com/2022/05/31/us-trained-extremists-fighting-russia-blowback/
by TJ Coles
+
Ukraine
volunteer fighter and US citizen Craig Lang armed by
Colombia to overthrow Venezuela’s gov't, FBI source says
https://thegrayzone.com/2022/06/05/ukraine-fighter-craig-lang-armed-colombia-overthrow-venezuelas/
by Alexander Rubinstein
+
DHS
‘Concerned’ Over Nazis Returning to US After Fighting in Ukraine. Why Isn’t the
Media?
by Alexander Rubinstein
+
YouTuber
3D Prints "World's First" Rocket Launcher And
Fires At Target
https://www.zerohedge.com/military/youtuber-3d-prints-world-first-rocket-launcher-and-fires-target
by Tyler Durden
3D printing has revolutionized gun-making
and has come a long way since the single-shot "The Liberator" pistol
was available for download in 2013. Now entire semiautomatic pistol carbines
can be entirely printed at home,
and weapon-making appears to have graduated to rocket launchers.
Youtuber "Ordnance
Lab"
(also known as Ordnance Lab LLC and holds a Type 10 FFL) published a video
showing what they say is the "world's first 3D printed rocket
launcher."
"In
this video we team up with D&S Creations, who have developed 3D printed rockets and rocket launchers. We test both a
smaller caliber rocket and a larger one, along with a prototype for a shaped charge warhead. This is just the start of our working on 3D printed rockets.
We have the launch and detonation figured out, now we need to work on getting
the accuracy figured out," Ordnance Lab said in the video's
description.
+
“Our BROKEN State”
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=NkWzZFKmhIY
with Chris Hedges
(13:09)
==========
r.
June 7, 2022
The Defender
Children’s Health Defense – News and Views
by Robert F. Kennedy, Jr.
+
Reports
with Max Blumenthal - Archives
https://open.spotify.com/show/23QHIvUTDvRez1snCDEROT
(audio reports)
+
The Gray
Zone - Archives
with Max Blumenthal
+
Daily digest for
nfu@simplelists.com, June 3
https://www.simplelists.com/nfu/dates/2022/06/
from Mark Crispin Miller
+
Daily digest for
nfu@simplelists.com, June 9
https://markcrispinmiller.substack.com/p/canadas-now-going-fully-bio-fascist?utm_source=email&s=r
from Mark Crispin Miller
==========
s.
News From Underground by Mark Crispini Miller
In memory
of those who "died suddenly" in the United States, May 31-June 6
(Part 1)
In memory
of those who "died suddenly" in the United States, May 31-June 6
(Part 2)
https://markcrispinmiller.substack.com/p/in-memory-of-those-who-died-suddenly-65f?s=r
In memory
of those who "died suddenly" in the UK, Ireland, France, the
Netherlands, the Czech Republic, Poland, Slovenia and Spain, May 31-June 6
In memory
of those who "died suddenly" in Canada, Mexico and South America, May
31-June 6
In memory
of those who "died suddenly" in Italy, May 31-June 6
+
Italy is
a death camp: In memory of those others who "died suddenly"
throughout the country, May 31-June 6 (Part 2)
https://markcrispinmiller.substack.com/p/italy-is-a-death-camp-in-memory-of?s=r
+
In memory
of those who "died suddenly" in Israel, Zimbabwe, Benin, Ukraine,
Georgia and—especially—Russia, May 31-June 6
https://markcrispinmiller.substack.com/p/in-memory-of-those-who-died-suddenly-913?s=r
+
In memory
of those who "died suddenly" in India, China, Taiwan, Malaysia, Japan
and New Zealand, May 31-June 6
https://markcrispinmiller.substack.com/p/in-memory-of-those-who-died-suddenly-083?s=r
+
NIH/NIND Vaccine Injury Study Participant Interview
(Dr. Danice Hertz)
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Bvssp9uA72A
(38:59)
==========
t.
URGENT:
Tell FDA Hands off Our Children - No EUAs for COVID Shots!
https://childrenshealthdefense.salsalabs.org/fda-hands-off-our-children?
by Children’s Health Defense
(2:46)
The U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA)
is declaring war on our children and it’s on each of us to be unrelenting as we
defend the next generation from Big Pharma and its allies. We need to stop the
FDA’s attack, beginning with a campaign to end unethical and unsubstantiated
Emergency Use Authorizations (EUA) that will subject younger and our most
vulnerable children to the unnecessary risks of COVID shots.
Please join Children’s Health Defense in
telling the FDA to get their #HandsOffOurChildren and let regulatory
authorities know that #ParentsAreWatching.
+
Only Mass
Protest Can Save Abortion Rights
https://scheerpost.com/2022/06/06/paul-street-only-mass-protest-can-save-abortion-rights/
by Paul Street
+
Abortion
funds, telehealth care, biohacked medicines: Crisis planning for post-Roe
America
by Shane Burley
EDITOR’S
NOTE: It remains unclear how the legal landscape may change nationally and
within individual states in the wake of the Supreme Court overturning Roe v.
Wade, but we wish to draw readers’ attention to warnings issued by abortion advocates and security experts about the potential use of data
tracking to criminalize abortion seekers. We encourage all readers to take
precautions with protecting their personal data, communications, and search
histories. While there are no guarantees that any method will eliminate the
threat of criminalization, we recommend consulting resources like the Digital Defense Fund.
==========
u.
From:
News from Underground
Date: Jun 9, 2022
Subject: Daily digest for nfu@simplelists.com
1.Following USDA guidance, state clinics destroyed thousands
of cans of useable baby formula - Mark Crispin Miller (08
Jun 2022 14:34 EDT) |
2.A huge uptick in disabilities is clearly due to
"vaccine" injury - Mark Crispin Miller (08
Jun 2022 16:19 EDT) |
2.Study finds that athletes' deaths are 1700% higher than
expected - Mark Crispin Miller (08 Jun 2022 16:22
EDT) |
4.New Yorkers, we now have a Medical Freedom Party! - Mark Crispin Miller (08 Jun 2022 17:53
EDT) |
1.Following USDA guidance,
state clinics destroyed thousands of cans of useable baby formula by Mark Crispin Miller (08 Jun
2022 14:34 EDT)
Reply
to list
ERIC
BOEHM | 6.8.2022
10:50 AM
2.A huge uptick in disabilities
is clearly due to "vaccine" injury by Mark Crispin Miller (08 Jun
2022 16:19 EDT)
Reply
to list
A Massive Spike in Disability
is Most Likely Due to a Wave of Vaccine Injuries
https://amidwesterndoctor.substack.com/p/a-massive-spike-in-disability-is?s=r
Note: When this article was originally written, I thought
the dataset was referring to individuals on SSI disability, not individuals who
met a different criteria of being disabled. The
central point still holds true (this data set more directly shows the correlation
to vaccine injury, but less clearly shows the economic impacts of that injury),
but the information in this article has been heavily revised and I apologize
for the initial error. I think the experience vaccine injured have with the
disability process is important so I am keeping that within the article even
though it is no longer directly relevant to this data.
Early in my medical practice, I elected to work with individuals seeking
disability because there was a shortage of doctors in my area willing to do
these exams (they do not pay well and we had a physician shortage to begin
with). My personal reason for involvement was that due to this shortage, many
individuals who desperately needed disability were facing significant delays
moving through the process, which often rippled out into causing significant
problems in their lives and those around them.
While a few people I saw were suffering from self-created problems and some
were either faking their condition or exaggerating their disability for money
(which is the typical lens disability claimants are seen through), I found the
majority had been through significant hardship that resulted in a life
impairing disability (some of their experiences were pretty horrific). I took
this as a sign a lot of vetting was done by the state before they were sent to
me.
In many of these cases, I felt if the individual had been my patient, they
would not have arrived at the place they needed to seek disability. Many of
them either had iatrogenic complications from the poorer quality of medical
care that individuals in state insurance programs like Medicaid have access to,
and had problems that would relatively fixable within a more integrative model
of medical care if they had had access to one.
A frequent topic of discussion with my colleagues was
whether granting someone disability was ultimately a harmful thing to do since
it removes their motivation to address their illness. This is important because
in almost all cases, being disabled and receiving disability is a far worse
life than not being disabled and having employment. I always kept this in mind
when I evaluated these claimants, and ultimately recommended disability for
many of them.
I found the majority of claimants I saw did not want to be disabled,
had tried over and over to get better, hated going through the process and were
only doing this because they had no other choice left. It also made me
particularly sad that many of them said I was one of the first doctors they met
who treated them as a human being, something I once again view as a consequence
of my working in a socioeconomically impoverished rural area where these
patients only had access to the inferior quality of medical care afforded by
state medical insurance.
From this job, I came to view the disability process as the last stop on the
train for individuals who had been failed by the system. Due to the legal
requirements of providing an impartial medical evaluation, I was not allowed to
provide any type of medical advice to these individuals and I eventually quit
the job because it just made me depressed and there was nothing I could do to
help the people I saw.
Today I learned Ed
Dowd (the
Blackrock executive who broke the story of the spike in life insurance claims
following the vaccine rollout) discovered something very, very
concerning (which can be verified here):
Click on the link for the rest.
3.Study finds that athletes'
deaths are 1700% higher than expected by Mark Crispin Miller (08 Jun
2022 16:22 EDT)
Reply
to list
4.New Yorkers, we now have a
Medical Freedom Party! by Mark
Crispin Miller (08 Jun 2022 17:53 EDT)
Reply
to list
Hello from an admirer and
fellow New Yorker!
In the realm of politics, of
possible interest to you will be New York's recently-founded Medical Freedom
Party. For information -- and statements from the candidates who are running
for office -- see the Web site below.
Best wishes,
Peter Allemano
---
Support News from Underground: https://bit.ly/NFUSupport
Visit News from Underground: https://markcrispinmiller.com
For archives, please go to: https://archives.simplelists.com/nfu