Bastille Day 2006
Grenoble, France
Dear Colleagues and Friends of CEIMSA,
I was living in the Pigalle district of Paris in the mid 1970s, when I
finished the research for my Ph.D. dissertation. Before defending my
thesis at the University of Wisconsin in 1976, I had already begun a
new research project, the social history of my neighborhood in Paris. I
was particularly interested in the modes of social control. Simone de
Beauvoir and Jean-Paul Sartre had became actively involved in defending
the rights of prostitutes, and a controversy emerged between those, on
the one hand, who perceived prostitutes as "workers" and defended their
rights to collective bargaining agreements (it was thought at the time
that this reform might free them from the tyranny of the Pimp) and, on
the other hand, those who perceived prostitution as a form of
"slavery", not to be reformed but, instead, to be abolished.
A great deal of testimony and new analysis grew out of this social
movement in the mid-1970s. One particularly interesting insight was the
nature of the prostitutes' relationships with Pimps (
les
maquereaux). In his role as manager, the Pimp often had almost
exclusive ownership privileges over his prostitutes. He alone
determined how much of their earnings they could keep, and he also
determined what sanctions they would suffer if ever they tried to
withhold more of their earnings, or keep any other secrets from him.
The explosive emotional encounters between Pimp and prostitute always
ended in the same way: this man subjected his women to fear and
humiliation, which served as a conspicuous object lesson for all
prostitutes, and she obediently returned to her niche in that part of
the
dependent hierarchy he had created.
The
Extinction Rule of logical levels within
dependent
hierarchies, such as the Pimp/prostitute relationship, suggests
that the lower levels, which are of greater complexity in the social
pyramid,
cannot exist outside the context with the higher, less
complex levels, which in a
legitimate hierarchy
constitutes the environment of the lower levels. The reverse is not
true; the higher less complex levels
can continue to exist
after the extinction of the lower levels of the hierarchy. This
fact might explain the necessity for violent interventions periodically
on the part of the manager-Pimp in order to prevent the dissolution of
the level he occupies in this
illegitimate hierarchy,
(and real relationships between
legitimate
levels would perhaps improve if
this
illegitimate intermediate level were removed from its
political dominance over the prostitute). The same pattern, some have
argued, can be seen in the general relationship of capital to labor,
again a
dependent hierarchy which necessitates violent
interventions on the part of capital in order to maintain control over
labor. This labor-management relationship has far-reaching cultural
consequences at every level of society. (By contrast,
legitimate
dependent hierarchies encompass relationships of
necessary
dependencies, because each order of complexity, being an open
system, must depend on the order above it, which is in fact its
environment
of matter-energy and information and is therefore essential for
its existence, its survival, and its eventual reproduction. Thus, for
example, within the dependent hierarchy of the mother/child
relationship
survival values are reproduced by the constraints
imposed by the mother, or in the producer/consumer relationship
use
values are generated by the producers. Likewise the
dependent
hierarchy of nature/society/culture represents increasing levels of
complexity in descending order, the existence of which depends on the
environment of the above levels which also impose
legitimate
constraints at the lower levels.)
One of my objectives in the Pigalle study was precisely to examine how
illegitimate
power over the prostitutes in this neighborhood was attained and
defended. By using a variety of techniques within the context of real,
imaginary, and symbolic relations,
the Pimp maintains advantages over the women he controls. This was one
focus of my research, when the revolt of the prostitutes in Pigalle
sparked a national debate among French intellectuals.
I had prepared for this study by reading the pioneering works in
communication theory by Raymond
Birdwhistell,
William Labov, and
Gregory Bateson's
classic collection of essays,
Steps to an Ecology
of Mind. Today t
his debate
has returned, but the context has changed. . . . For evidence of
this change, see :
The psychology of authoritarian managers of capital cannot be
understood when abstracted from its social and historical context. The
very profitable investment opportunities afforded by
crisis
capitalism today are contingent on
a new authoritarian mode of
management, which can guarantee standards of production by
successfully constraining the expression of
species
consciousness for long-term survival, as well as
manifestations of
class consciousness for economic
equality and
group consciousness for political justice.
The prototype for this style of management is the Pimp who operates
almost exclusively on the ontological level of
individual
disadvantages.
For more on "male" domination of the "effeminate" mind see The
Authoritarian Personality, by T.W. Adorno, et al. The purpose of
this research is described in the Preface of this book :
- This is a book about social
discrimination. But its purpose is not simply to add a few more
empirical
- findings to an already extensive
body of information. The central theme of the work is a relatively
- new concept --the rise of an
"anthropological" species we call the authoritarian type of man. In
contrast
- to the bigot of the older style he
seems to combine the ideas and skills which are typical of a highly
- industrialized society with
irrational or anti-rational beliefs. He is at the same time enlightened
and
- superstitious, proud to be an
individualist and in constant fear of not being like all the others,
jealous
- of his independence and inclined to
submit blindly to power and authority. The character structure
- which comprises these conflicting
trends has already attracted the attention of modern philosophers
- and political thinkers. This book
approaches the problem with the means of socio-psychological research. (p.xi)
Emotional domination by the Pimp is the hallmark of his
control. He speaks with the authority of realism. The rules of power
and privilege are clear for all to see, and any revolt within the
hierarchy is perceived as an unwelcome disruption of
the natural
order, if not a suicidal departure from
reality. In his
book,
The Rules are No Game, Anthony Wilden describes the
self-righteous emotionalism that passes for justice in the
illegitimate
hierarchies of all colonial systems, imaginary and real, including
systems of male supremacy and prostitution.
- Today the post-Vietnam
strategy is readily made flesh in medieval brutality: in state
terrorist tactics
- and the technology of torture, new
and old, constantly refined by the ever-expanding stromtrooper
- elites around the world. ...
- On examination forty
years after the event, these 'boys books" are not at all the "good
clean fun" or
- the "ideal worlds" we imagined them
to be. They are suffused throughout with an ideology of retribution,
- if that's the word I want --an
ideology of (white) might makes right. They present on the whole a view
- of "justice" that unconsciously
prepares the mind for the unjust act. They ignore the common basis of
- social organization: "natural
justice" in English common law and "due process" in the more advanced
- capitalist democracy of the United
States.
- The result of this
unconscious learning is disastrous to civil society. As if by the
inherent godliness of priests,
- or the awful majesty of law, or the
divine rights of kings, the ideology of retribution --the
self-righteous
- punishment of real and imaginary
wrongs-- turns into what every colonizer recognizes as the strategy of
- colonialism: The absolute right of
"absolute good" (the colonizers) to do absolutely anything to
absolutely
- anyone they have defined as
criminal, immoral, animal, or evil.
- Vengeance is mine,
saith the Lord, I will repay. (p.324)
The early feminist researchers in
domination/subjugation relationship studies developed new concepts
derived from very close observations of real relationships.
Anthony Wilden reviewed Brownmiller's book :
- A fascist I define as
anyone who enjoys inflicting violence or suffering, physical or mental,
on other living beings.
- In 1975, in an unforgettable book
Against Our Will, Susan Brownmiller spelled out in horrifying detail
the secret
- history of the grand strategy used
by imperial generals in wars of conquest, colonial warfare, slave
rebellions,
- peasant revolts, and people's wars.
- The objective is to
destroy the will to resist; the target is the entire population; the
strategy is terror; the means is
- torture; the usual end is death;
most of the victims are women and children; the worst instrument is
rape.
- To do this, you simply
let your men loose on anyone they choose. You use men and boys you have
brutalized
- through race and class oppression
and the army, police, and prison systems as your instruments of
imperial terror
- against young and old.
- As the men say, 'All's
fair in love and war.'Rape is not a crime of passion, but a crime of
power, a deliberate, conscious act of torture and degradation. Rape
- is the cross-burning and the
lynching that keeps every woman in her place --and dependent on some
men (father,
- brother, boyfriend, husband, son,
police) to protect her from other men.
- As the women say,
Pornography is the theory, rape is the practice.'In colonial war and
banditry, individual men and often gangs of men rape and mutilate women
and children, girls
- and boys, and, less often, other
men. For imperial troops and bandits this is an act of 'manhood'
--meaning here
- the power of God over anyone and
everyone without a weapon or the strength to fight back.
- In basic training with
the US Army, the first definition in the Naming of Parts has long been
this one:
- This is my rifle (18-year-old holds up M-16)
- This is my gun (puts hand to crotch)
- One is for killing
- The other for fun.
- 'All's fair in love and war' is the
manifesto of the mercenary, the bandit, the free fire zone, the death
squad. Imperial
- troops and bandits fight for the
power to do with other people exactly what they please. People's armies
obey strict
- codes of ethics --and above all Chu
Teh's Tenth Rule: 'Never take liberties with women'.
- General Chu Teh
(b.1886) laid down his fifteen Rules of Discipline in 1928, as his
peasant guerrillas battled the Nationalist
- forces of Chiang Kai-shek and the
warlords in the rural uprising whose failure led to the formation of
the celebrated 4th
- Red Army and the 22-year-long
guerrilla partnership between Chu Teh, the soldier, and Mao Tse-Tung,
the commissar.
- Chu Teh's Tenth Rule
was implicitly observed by the Viet Cong guerrillas and the North
Vietnamese regulars throughout
- the Vietnam war, as the Saigon
correspondents knew very well, but did not care to report --perhaps
because among
- American troops rape was known as
'SOP' or 'standard operating procedure'. The man who broke the Saigon
press corps'
- silence was Peter Arnett, a New
Zealander, who told Susan Brownmiller, who put it in her book. (pp.27-28)
Jean-Paul Sartre describes the extremes to which
illegitimate
hierarchies are defended in his s
tatement "On Genocide",
given at the Second Session of the Bertrand Russell
International War Crimes Tribunal on Vietnam, held in Denmark
in November 1967.
Discussions among the left have produced a radical analysis of the
prostitution industry as a subsystem of the greater
capitalism-in-crisis system. The non-reformist solution to all forms of
exploitation is, according to this radical egalitarian view, democracy
at a meaningful level.
Perhaps the best documentary film which depicts the
illegitimate hierarchy of Corporate Control of American Society is
now available on the Internet. Please visit :
1) Videos and internet links made available by CEIMSA:
http://dimension.ucsd.edu/CEIMSA-IN-EXILE/liens.html
2) Free Videos :
Information
Clearing House with videos
Check our "The Corporation" video on
the video menu on the left of the home page.
3) More free Videos :
TruthOut with
videos
For a lucid exposé of the illegitimate
hierarchy of the American electoral system, we recommend
Michael Parenti's article "On the Stolen Election". Please visit the
CEIMSA web site page :
http://dimension.ucsd.edu/CEIMSA-IN-EXILE/ateliers2/a15/
or go directly to Parenti's article by clicking on Atelier
N°15, Article N° 37 :
http://dimension.ucsd.edu/CEIMSA-IN-EXILE/ateliers2/a15/art15-37.html
And finally, readers will find below five articles
received by CEIMSA this week which speak to this contemporary theme of
illegitimate hierarchies originating from American Society :
Item
A. is a recent
New
York Times advertisement entitled "A Troubling Alliance" and
paid
for by
Council for National Interest, voicing protest
against continued U.S. subsidies for Israeli imperialist aggressions
against the Palestinian people.
Items
B. and
C.
are commentaries on the rape and murder last week of fifteen-year-old
Abeer
Qasim Hamza
in Iraq by a group of U.S. soldiers.
Item
D. is Dahr Jamal's
reflections on
Orwellian
"doublethink" employed by American officials in Iraq..
Item
E. is a description of the
criminal plunder of Iran's historical artifacts and efforts to
constrain this classic imperialist behavior by professors at the
University of Chicago.
Sincerely,
Francis McCollum Feeley
Professor of American Studies/
Director of Research
Université Stendhal - Grenoble 3
http://dimension.ucsd.edu/CEIMSA-IN-EXILE/
_______________
A.
From : Council for the National Interest Foundation :
Date: Tue, 11 Jul 2006
Subject: America and Israel: A Troubling Alliance
America and Israel: A
Troubling Alliance
The response to our Fourth of July weekend Sunday New York Times
advertisement (July 2nd, "Week in Review" section) has been very
strong. Despite the fact that the webserver handling our inbound email
traffic and websites had a massive failure for four days, from July 6th
through the 9th, in the week following publication of the full-page ad,
we have received hundreds of emails and dozens of telephone calls from
new supporters.
Failure of the website was due to a bad hard drive, which was corrected
as quickly as possible. We are hoping that those who tried to send
emails to us during the period July 6th through 9th and were
unsuccessful will repeat their messages to us.
This is the second in a series of six full-page advertisements
appearing opposite the editorial page in the Sunday New York Times,
which has a circulation of 1.8 million and a readership of 3 million
across the country and internationally. The advertisement dated July
2nd and titled "America and Israel: A Troubling Alliance" is available
in three different formats on our website for downloading or resending
to others who might be on your own email lists. The next ad will be
coming out in September, if not before, so if you haven't yet made a
contribution to our campaign, you can do so by clicking the button
below or by mailing a check to the address below.
Eugene Bird
President
From : Council for the National Interest Foundation :
Date: Fri, 14 Jul 2006
Subject: CNI Calls for U.S.
Action, Engagement on Real Israel-Lebanon Issues
CNI Calls for American Action, Engagement
on Real Israel-Lebanon Issues
July 14, 2006 (Washington, DC)
- In a statement titled
"A Reality
Check: The Three Real Issues Between Israel and Lebanon," two
former congressmen and a former ambassador, board members of the
Council for the National Interest, call on the President and the U.S.
State Department to immediately send a high level envoy to the Middle
East whose task would be not just a ceasefire but a settlement of the
three major issues between Israel and Lebanon. The signatories include
former Congressman Paul Findley (R-IL), a long time member of the House
Foreign Relations Committee, former Senator James Abourezk (D-SD),
Vice-Chairman of the CNI Foundation and founder of the American Arab
Anti-Discrimination Committee, and former Ambassador Robert Keeley, the
Chairman of the CNI Foundation board.
In taped interviews conducted by a CNI delegation to the region in
January, Lebanese Prime Minister Fuad Siniora and Hezbollah
Secretary-General Sheikh Hassan Nasrallah separately expressed the need
for negotiation on the three outstanding issues between Israel and
Lebanon. Those outstanding issues include making available to Lebanese
authorities a map of the 140,000 mines Israel left in Lebanon after
withdrawing in 2000, the return of three small sectors of land that
overlook the Litani River in Lebanon that Israel still retains, and the
return of three Lebanese prisoners that Israel still holds.
Eugene Bird, President of the Council for the National Interest, is
available for interviews regarding discussions he participated in as
part of a CNI delegation earlier this year at 202-863-2951 or by
sending an email to
CNIFoundation@gmail.com.
The interview subjects included the following, among others:
- Prime Minister Fuad Siniora of Lebanon
- Secretary-General Hassan Nasrallah
- the brother of the longest-serving Lebanese prisoner still held
in Israeli jails
- President Emile Lahoud of Lebanon
- President Bashar al-Assad of Syria
- Khaled Meshal, Hamas political leader in Damascus, Syria
- Mahmoud Zahar, Hamas political leader in the Gaza Strip
An hour-long video including segments of
each of these interviews, titled "Islam and Democracy," is available
from the Council for the National Interest by sending an email to CNIFoundation@gmail.com.
Streaming video clips will be made available on Monday, July 17th.
A REALITY CHECK:
THE THREE REAL ISSUES BETWEEN ISRAEL AND LEBANON
The Council for the
National Interest Foundation calls for American action, engagement on
the real issues between Israel and Lebanon
July 14, 2006
The complicity of the United States in the Israeli
actions against civilians in Gaza and Lebanon are apparent to the whole
world. Former Congressman Paul Findley (R-IL), a long time member of
the House Foreign Relations Committee, former Senator James Abourezk
(D-SD), Vice-Chairman of the CNI Foundation and founder of the American
Arab Anti-Discrimination Committee, and former Ambassador Robert
Keeley, the Chairman of the CNI Foundation have asked the Council for
the National Interest to strongly advise the Secretary of State and the
President to adopt a more active role in the current crisis in the
Middle East.
Eugene Bird, president of the CNI Foundation said,
“No one is denying the right of a nation or a people to defend itself.
But Israel does not have the right to destroy bridges, roads, power
stations and international airports in a vindictive show of force, in
what will likely be a futile attempt to force the release of the two
soldiers captured near the border.”
The right to defend a nation of people also applies
to even the followers of Hezbollah trying to regain still-occupied
territory and prisoners held illegally by Israel. Hezbollah is not seen
as a terrorist organization in Lebanon, but as a legitimate resistance
movement that succeeded in forcing Israel to retreat after eighteen
years from most all of Southern Lebanon.
A special high-level envoy of the President should
be sent to the region to seek an end to the attacks on civilians by
both Israel and Hezbollah. But the United States should not stop there;
there are three issues between Israel and Lebanon, which must be solved
if the same old pattern of tit-for-tat is to be ended once and for all.
The absence of the United States from engaging in the region,
especially in the past six months has been the most remarkable reason
for the breakdown of the ceasefires.
The fact that the most democratic Arab country is
being attacked by Israel undercuts the claim often made by members of
the current administration that democracies never go to war with each
other. The president is correctly concerned, as he has stated that the
Israeli retaliatory attacks on Lebanon should not undermine Prime
Minister Siniora’s government. It is of course ironic that the major
civilian targets for Israel were the international airport and the
bridges and highway named after Rafiq al-Hariri. We can only hope that
Israel did not consult with the United States before striking these
particular targets.
The U.S. Arms Export Control Act restricts the use
of U.S. weapons to legitimate self-defense and internal policing; U.S.
weapons cannot be used to attack civilians in offensive operations. The
U.S. Foreign Assistance Act prohibits U.S. aid of any kind to a country
with a pattern of gross human rights violations.
In the first few days of the offensive against
Lebanon tens of millions of dollars worth of U.S. munitions have been
used by Israel against a country friendly to the United States and a
government fully supported by America. The fact that civilian
structures that were a part of the major rebuilding of Lebanon by
Hariri were destroyed in less than 48 hours with American weapons is a
sad commentary on the lack of real American policy towards not only
Lebanon but other countries of the Levant. And none of the military
actions are at all helpful to Israel.
There are real issues between Lebanon and Israel
that should have been settled with the help of the United States long
ago. Israel failed to keep her promise to make available maps of the
140,000 mines she left behind in Lebanon. Three small sectors of land
overlooking the Litani River were retained by Israel and were the cause
of complaints from the government of Prime Minister Fuad Siniora, not
just Hezbollah. The three Lebanese prisoners that were moved by Israel,
contrary to the Geneva Convention prohibition against an occupying
power transporting prisoners into its own territory, should have been
returned long ago.
The U.S. has ignored all three complaints made
repeatedly by the Siniora government.
The Council for the National Interest delegation to
the Palestinian elections also visited Beirut and talked with all
factions from the President on down. In almost every case, the three
issues cited above were mentioned and an appeal was made for the United
States to take some action before it was too late. That was six months
ago and now the United States is faced with the possibility of a
full-scale Middle East war in Lebanon and Syria and a continuing civil
war in Palestine.
The way out of this morass of easily foreseen crises
is for the United States in consultation with Egypt, Jordan and even
with Syria to take the lead to settle these three issues. That would be
real preventative diplomacy.
One idea that should be explored is the
incorporation of the Hezbollah militia into a new and expanded Lebanese
army. This has been done in other parts of the world when rebel
insurgents join coalitions and become apart of governance.
So long as the American administration backed by congressional
voices parroting the Israeli line that the Hezbollah attack was
launched without cause or reason, the administration will be risking a
widening of the present attacks on Lebanon. That would not be in the
interest of the United States nor is it in the interest of Israel.
Council for the National Interest Foundation
1250 4th Street SW, Suite WG-1
Washington, District of Columbia 20024
202-863-2951
http://www.cnionline.org/
http://www.rescuemideastpolicy.com/
_______________
B.
from Truthout :
Date 2 July 2006
Investigators believe American soldiers spent nearly a
week plotting an attack in which they raped an Iraqi woman, then killed
her and her family in an insurgent-ridden area south of Baghdad, a US
military official said Saturday.
_______________
C.
from Information Clearing House :
Date 4 July 2006
He found Abeer sprawled dead in a corner, her hair and a
pillow next to her consumed by fire, and her dress pushed up to her
neck.
_______________
D.
from Dahr Jamail :
Date 3 July 2006
Orwell in Iraq: Snow Jobs,
Zarqawi and Bogus Peace Plans
by Dahr Jamail
"My personal opinion is that the only way we will lose this war is if
we pull out prematurely," said Colonel Jeffrey Snow, who commands a
brigade of soldiers in Iraq. Snow, as reported by AFP on June 30th,
fears losing public support in the US for the ongoing occupation of
Iraq because of "negative perceptions" at home due to news that is
"always bad."
Reuters reported, also on June 30th, Snow admitting that resistance
attacks in Baghdad have risen despite the recent security crackdown
that brought tens of thousands of American and Iraqi soldiers, new
checkpoints and curfews in the capital city.
The same Col. Snow, unable (or more likely, unwilling) to provide
statistics on the increased number of attacks, instead used the excuse
that the steps the US military took to tell the Iraqi people about the
new security measures kept resistance fighters informed of the
military's plans. On that note, it couldn't be more obvious that
someone in his position is there for his ability to follow orders,
rather than his aptitude toward the application of logic.
In another dazzling flash of brain activity, Snow, who obviously thinks
"war" is a suitable term for the illegal occupation of Iraq, commented,
"We expected there would be an increase in attacks, and that is
precisely what's happened." He also added, "I believe that these
attacks are going to go down over time. So I remain optimistic."
Snow is obviously annoyed with the fact that select media outlets
continue to report the increasing violence, ongoing deaths of Iraqi
civilians and US soldiers, and th?t the country is, at this point,
essentially as devastated as it was when Hulagu Khan's Mongols sacked
Baghdad 748 years ago.
Just three days before the flash of brilliant analysis by Snow, the
Iraqi health ministry announced it had received 262 corpses within the
previous four days as the result of armed operations all over the
country. It also reported that 580 people were injured in the same time
period, and did not count people known to have been abducted and
murdered but whose bodies have not yet been found.
But Snow seems to be less concerned with the reality on the ground than
he is with public perception of the hell that Iraq has become. While he
admits that his own troops have come under a greater number of
resistance attacks, he preferred to offer his professional critique of
media coverage on the failed state of Iraq.
"Our soldiers may be in the crosshairs every day, but it is the
American voter who is a real target, and it is the media that carries
the message back each day across the airwaves. So when the news is not
balanced and it's always bad, that clearly leads to negative
perceptions back home," said the leader of the 1st Brigade of the 10th
mountain Division, which has been in Iraq nearly one year.
Determined to leave reporters with a warm, fuzzy feeling inside about
the situation in Iraq, as well as to explain his obvious
contradictions, Snow added, "The way I would answer that is that
attacks here recently are up in our area. However, the overall
effectiveness is down. So you may perceive that as double-speak."
While Snow was busy contemplating his gifts of double-speak the next
day, July 1st, a car bomb attacked a police patrol in Sadr City,
Baghdad, killing at least 62 people and wounding over 100.
With the plan to secure Baghdad, "Operation Forward Together," now
three weeks old, and the so-called terror leader in Iraq, Abu Musab
al-Zarqawi, killed, the security situation has only continued to
deteriorate.
"Killing Zarqawi has not improved the situation in Iraq one bit," said
Loretta Napoleoni, Fullbright Scholar at Johns Hopkins University,
author of the books Terror Inc. and Insurgent Iraq. While speaking to
an audience in Seville, Spain, where we both gave lectures about the
situation in Iraq this past weekend, the expert about Zarqawi and
terror groups now operating in Iraq added, "In fact, it might well have
made things worse. There is evidence to back the claim that al-Qaeda
gave information to the Multi-National Forces about Zarqawi to have him
killed, since they had been having problems with him for quite some
time. Thus, killing him may well have strengthened the link between
al-Qaeda and Sunni resistance groups in Iraq."
When I interviewed Napoleoni, she told me that the image of Zarqawi
portrayed by Western media outlets was basically the antithesis of
reality. "He [Zarqawi] was not in control of the Sunni resistance. He
was in control of a very small group of jihadists, predominantly
foreign fighters. He was extremely unpopular among the other factions
of Sunni resistance fighters. Some of the members of the resistance
even tried two times to remove him because he was a negative political
influence."
While talking with Napoleoni I wondered if Col. Snow truly believed his
own rhetoric. I asked her what she thought of the constant assertions
in Western corporate media outlets that Zarqawi was the "leader of the
Iraqi resistance."
"Well it's not true. It's absolutely not true," she told me, "I don't
know what they base these kinds of statements on. The resistance in
Iraq is quite complex, including the Shia factions, and of course
al-Zarqawi was not in control of that. Finally, al-Zarqawi was a
foreigner. This is the key element. The Iraqi resistance would never
follow a foreigner as a leader."
Hoping to shed some light on how people like Col. Snow, along with so
many US citizens, remain so ignorant about the reality on the ground in
Iraq, I asked Napoleoni, who lectures regularly on the financing of
terrorism as well as being an economist, another question.
Who is actually conducting the terrorism in Iraq? "The majority of the
suicide missions are carried out by non-Iraqis. There are lots of
people coming from the Gulf. There is a jihadist web site that lists
the names of the martyrs, and you can see that they come from Saudi
Arabia, Kuwait and even from the Emirates. This is the majority of the
suicide missions. Some people come from Syria and Jordan, but the vast
majority of people come from the Gulf."
So much for ongoing attempts by the Cheney administration to implicate
Syria and Iran in collaborating with the Iraqi resistance. All Cheney
needs to do is have his puppet, Mr. Bush, ask his pal, the King of
Saudi Arabia, why they are allowing so many martyrs into Iraq.
Col. Snow take note, because if you really want to know what you are
attempting to hide from people in the US, you should ask Napoleoni.
According to her, the reason why Zarqawi and the few terrorist groups
operating in Iraq are given so much media attention is because the
Cheney administration "needs to personalize the enemy and needs to have
a dichotomy between good and evil. This has been, very much, the Bush
[Cheney] administration's policy right from the beginning. His [Bush's]
first speech after 9/11 was "You are either with us or you are against
us." So he clearly stated there is nothing in between. So al-Zarqawi
had to be an evil individual the same way that Saddam Hussein was
portrayed as an evil individual because, you know, there is a moral
battle here."
Col. Snow and other gullible US citizens should heed her conclusion
about why the myth of Zarqawi was blown so large and wide. "Of course
this [moral battle] is the umbrella under which the economic battle and
the hegemonic battles are taking place," she said.
While we were discussing the US-propagated myth of Zarqawi, I decided
to ask Napoleoni to comment on the absurd statements made by Western
corporate media outlets claiming that Zarqawi was in control of
Fallujah during the November 2004 massacre in the city.
"Al-Zarqawi was never in control of Fallujah," she told me, "In fact,
he was never in Fallujah." As we discussed the second US assault on
Fallujah in depth, she mentioned that negotiations between resistance
groups, tribal leaders and the US military were happening right up to
the launching of Operation Phantom Fury against Fallujah.
"The reason why that negotiation failed was because after it was
agreed, the Americans basically demanded to have al-Zarqawi, and of
course the people of Fallujah couldn't give him to the Americans
because he was not in Fallujah," she said, confirming what I'd been
told by my sources in the city.
Another recent clue as to why resistance attacks against US and Iraqi
forces have been on the rise as of late is the "failed" reconciliation
plan put forth by Prime Minister Nuri al-Maliki.
The vague plan offered by the Shia-dominated puppet government was
flawed from the beginning, and when I asked Napoleoni what she thought
of the "plan" she said, "I don't think it is going to work at all. I
think it is a window dressing for the West. I think it is one of these
political decisions in order to sell an image to the West saying, "Oh,
the new government in Iraq is actually offering peace. But this peace
is going to be rejected; therefore the new government has no other
choice but to continue repressing the people."
She continued, "I don't think there was anything in that proposal that
was written in order to bring a deal. Because if you look at this, it
is impossible for any of those groups to accept it. It's too vague, for
a start. Also, it basically prohibits amnesty for anybody who has done
any activity motivated by political violence. So of course this was
rejected because there was no way an amnesty is going to be accepted by
the Sunni when we are in a situation where the government is in the
hands of the Shia."
There is one thing that Col. Snow said about the US corporate media
that he and I agree on. Napoleoni, who worked for several banks and
internation?l organizations in Europe and the US as well as having
brought heads of state from around the world together to create a new
strategy for combating the financing of terror networks, agreed as well.
And that is when Col. Snow told reporters, "It is the American voter
who is a real target."
________________
E.
from Niki Akhavan :
Date July 03, 2006
Looting Iran
by Niki Akhavan
It took years of painful sanctions and numerous
bombing
campaigns before looters swept in to steal Iraq’s archaeological
treasures. It seems that in the case of Iran, the theft may precede
sanctions and war.
The University of Chicago’s Oriental Institute is currently in
possession of ancient Iranian artifacts including a collection of
2,500-year-old tablets acquired on loan in 1937 which chronicle the
daily workings of the Persian Empire. The University is being sued to
turn over the artifacts as restitution to victims of a 1997 bombing in
Israel. Representing five Americans injured in that attack, David J.
Strachman successfully sued the Iranian government for $71.5 million
dollars on the grounds that Iran is responsible as a state sponsor of
terrorism. In order to recover this sum from a non-responsive Iranian
government who has thus far declined to appear in the U.S. courts or to
acknowledge their judgments, Strachman has demanded that the University
and several museums auction their collection of ancient artifacts and
turn over the funds to him and his clients. Last week, he came one step
closer to achieving his goal when a federal judge rejected one of the
University’s main defense arguments.
In 2004, scholars at the University of Chicago’s Oriental Institute
began taking significant steps towards renewing their relationship to
their counterparts in Iran. For the first time since close cooperation
between Iran and the University ended in 1979, the Institute returned a
number of the ancient tablets to the Iranian Cultural Organization as a
“good faith” gesture made in the hope of negotiating agreements for new
excavations and joint training and publication programs. If Strachman
succeeds in forcing the sale of the remaining artifacts, the
reconciliation between the University and Iran will not be the only
relationship that will be undermined.
Iranians from a range of backgrounds, be they staunch supporters or
sworn enemies of their current government, are increasingly becoming
aware of the double standards, misrepresentations, and unjust
maneuverings around domestic and international laws that seem to be at
play when it comes to Iran. The backlash against the propaganda war
against Iran and Iranians can be found in events both trivial and
deadly serious. Fans of the Iranian National Soccer team were
infuriated, for example, when American sportscasters used the occasion
of Iran’s opening match against Mexico to rehash the Western media’s
favorite clichés about President Ahmadinejhad and his
controversial statements regarding Israel and the Holocaust. The games
of no other national teams have been inappropriately used as a
political forum, and this fact did not escape Iranian viewers, whose
bitterness at an earlier than expected exit from the World Cup was
further agitated by unsavory sports coverage.
While the wrangling over Iran’s nuclear program may not inflame as many
passions as did the World Cup, it too has become yet another arena
wherein Iran and Iranians are treated according to a seemingly
different set of standards than that which is applied to the rest of
the world. Iran is a voluntary signatory of the Non-Proliferation
Treaty, the terms of which guarantee its right to completing Uranium
enrichment cycles on its own soil for the purposes of developing a
civilian nuclear program. As the so-called “international community”
deploys various carrots and sticks in attempts to persuade Iran not to
exercise this right, Iran’s nuclear armed and non-NPT signing neighbors
in the region are not only exempt from being subject to inspections of
their nuclear facilities, but are variously rewarded with praise and
economic aid. The continuing application of this double-standard is
irksome and counter-productive: it will force the majority of Iranians
who support a civilian nuclear program to further dig in their heels,
and it will lead those who oppose nuclear technology to distrust the
intentions of administrations who claim to act for the good of the
Iranian people.
In the end, if Iranians are divided over the nuclear issue, there is at
least one subject around which they can fanatically converge, even more
so than they do with their National Soccer Team, and that is Iran’s
ancient cultural and historical heritage. What the University of
Chicago has in its possession is part and parcel of a heritage that
belongs to the Iranian people and cannot be identified as the property
of any ruling government. To force their sale on the dubious grounds
that Strachman has offered and the U.S. courts have accepted is a
manipulation of justice and a nail in the coffin of reconciliation
between Iran and the United States.
------------------
Niki Akhavan is an anti-war activist and a PhD candidate at the
University of California at Santa Cruz, where she is completing a PhD
thesis on the relationship between new media technologies and
contemporary Iranian cultural politics. She is a board member of the
recently formed "Campaign Against Sanctions and Military Intervention
in Iran" (
http://www.campaigniran.org/casmii/).
*********************
Francis McCollum Feeley
Professor of American Studies/
Director of Research
Université de Grenoble-3
Grenoble, France
http://dimension.ucsd.edu/CEIMSA-IN-EXILE/