Bulletin N° 794
Subject : The economic,
political and ideological debacle of capitalism now underway . . . .
21 April 2018
Grenoble, France
Dear Colleagues and Friends of CEIMSA,
Recently at a scholarly
intervention at the University of Minsk in Belarus, I had the opportunity to engage
in a discussion on the topic of “science and ethics.” In this extended
conversation, I invoked the writings of Etienne de La Boétie
(1530-1563), Baruch Spinoza (1632-1677), and Gaston Bachelard
(1884-1962).
Bachelard,
I explained at the meeting, had contributed to my understanding of scientific
thinking by pointing out the close relationship which exists between scientific production and artistic production. Both activities
require an active human mind, disciplined by the desire to obtain results
which bear upon the experience of observation and
reflection. In both cases – with the formulation of the scientific problematic,
as with the initial conceptualization of the artistic project - the objective
is to make a contribution toward a new human understanding or appreciation, with coherency and
social fellowship when the achievements are formally recognized. Art,
like science, relies on social participation, and in the event of a "scientific
discovery”, as with the creation of an original work of art, this social
participation includes judgments within a specific community of people to help
interpret the value of the work and place it in its historical/social context.
In his book, La
formation de l’esprit scientifique,
Bachelard writes about the importance of formulating an
adequate problematic: “If there has been no question, there can be no
scientific understanding. Nothing is self-evident. Nothing is given. Everything
is constructed.” This, then, is the creative impulse that both scientists and artists
live with; and, of course, it is a human quality that is often stifled in youth,
for obvious reasons in a class-divided society.
Spinoza, also, is
concerned with the nature and the potential of the human mind and in his work, The
Ethics, he studies the effects of emotions on
human thought. There are, he writes, both active and passive emotions - ‘good’
emotions which enhance our understanding, and ‘bad’ emotions which impede our
understanding. He goes on to describe three kinds of knowledge: ‘Confused
knowledge”, derived from random events and fragmentary ideas; ‘Abstract
knowledge’ derived from rational understanding of cause and effect and
adequate ideas of attributes of ‘Existence’; and ‘Intuitive knowledge’
(a synthetic understanding) which stems from love of ‘Nature’ and
‘Essence’. I explained to the group of
scholars why I have allowed myself to be influenced by this ontology that
engages in the nature of being – of ‘existence’ and ‘essence’ and its
relationship with the rest of nature (using the analogy of the candle-maker
bringing into existence the candle
which when thrown into the fire no longer exists, but leaves, nevertheless, its
essence in the residue of wax.)
The general confusion
which reigns in a divided society is not disinterested, but rather is initiated
from above, for purposes of expanding private ownership and maintianing politcal power over society.
Part Five of his book
is entitled, “Of the Power of the Intellect, or Of Human Freedom”, and this is
where Spinoza postulates Proposition N° 28:
The
conatus, or desire, to know things by the third kind of knowledge, cannot arise
from the first kind of
knowledge, but from the second.(p.217)
In 1661, Spinoza
discusses the concept of ‘Free Will’ in a letter addressed to the German
theologian and scientific thinker, Henry Oldenburg:
Secondly, you ask me whaqt
errors I see in the philosophy of Descartes and Bacon. In this request, too, I
shall try to oblige you, although it is not my custom to expose the errors of
others. The first and most important error is this, that they have gone far
astray from knowledge of the first cause and origin of all things. Secondly,
they have failed to achieve understanding of the true nature of the human mind.
Thirdly, they have never grasped the true cause of error. Only those who are
completely destitute of all learning and scholarship can fail to see the
critical importance of true knowledge of these three points.
How far astray they have wandered from true
knowledge of the first cause and of the human mind can readily be gathered from
the truth of the three propositions to which I have already referred. So I
confine myself to pointing out the third error. Of Bacon I shall say little; he
speaks very confusedly on this point, and simply makes assertions while proving
hardly anything. In the first place, he talks for granted that the human
intellect, apart from the fallibility of the senses, is by its very nature liable
to error, framing its assumptions on the analogy of its own nature, and not on
the analogy of the universe, so that it is like a mirror of irregular surface
receiving rays, mingling its own nature with the nature of reality, and so
forth. Secondly, he holds that the human intellect, by reason of its own
nature, is prone to abstractions, and imagines that things that are in flux are
stable, and so on. Thirdly, he holds that the human intellect is continually
increasing and cannot come to a halt or rest. Whatever other causes he assigns
can readily be reduced to the one Cartesian principle, that the human will is
free and more extensive that the intellect, or, as Verulam
himself more confusedly puts it the intellect is not characterized by a dry
light, but received infusion from the will. (We should here observe that Verulam often takes ‘intellect’ for ‘mind’, there in
differing form Descartes.) This cause, then, disregarding the others as being
of little importance, I shall show to be false. Indeed, they would easily have
seen this for themselves, had they but given consideration to the fact that the will differs from this or that volition in the same way
as whiteness differs from this or that white object, or as humanity differs
from this or that human being. §So to conceive the will to be the cause of this
or that volition is as impossible as to conceive humanity to be the cause of
Peter or Paul.
Since, then, the will is nothing more than a
mental construct (ens rationis), it can in no way be said to be the cause of this
or that volition. Particular volitions, since they need a cause in order to
exist, cannot be said to be free; rather they are necessarily determined to be
such as they are by their own causes. Lastly, according to Descartes, errors
are themselves particular volitions, from which it necessarily follows that
errors - that is, particular volitions –
are not free, but are determined by external causes and in no way by the will.
This is what I undertook to prove.(pp.228-229)
The epistemological
errors of Descartes and Bacon prevented them, according to Spinoza, from
understanding the proper limits of knowledge, of finding ‘truth’ by way of ‘empiricism’, ‘justification’, and ‘logical
deduction’; and to reduce or remove doubt with ‘warrant’, ‘rationality’ and
‘probability’. The result of this error was ‘Confused knowledge’ and fragmentary ideas.
The third study to which I referred in my talk this
past week at the international conference on “science and ethics” in Minsk was The
Politics of Obedience, The Discourse of Voluntary Servitude, by Etienne
de La Boétie, written when he was no more than 23
years old. This radical essay, which aimed to educate the general public, is
diametrically opposed to the immortal tract of Nicolai Machiavelli (1469-1527), who
sought to win favor by speaking truth to power. Boétie’s
writing calls us back to the social context in which we who do scientific
investigations live and work. This social context of economic inequality is
necessarily riddled with social class strife and political manipulations. Boétie gives us a penetrating analysis of how a population
interrelates to produce wealth for their rulers.
It is true that in the
beginning men submit under constraint and by force; but those who come after
them obey without regret and perform willingly what their predecessors had done
because they had to. This is why men born under the yoke and then nourished and
reared in slavery are content, without further effort, to live in their native
circumstance, unaware of any other state or right, and considering as quite
natural the condition into which they are born . . . the powerful influence of
custom is in no respect more compelling than in this, namely, habituation to
subjection.
. . .
Roman tyrants . . .
provided the city wards with feasts to cajole the rabble . . . . Tyrants would
distribute largesse, a bushel of wheat, a gallon of wine, and a sesterces: and then everybody would shamelessly cry, “Long
live the King!” The fools did not realize that they were merely recovering a
portion of their own property, and that their ruler could not have given them
what they were receibing without having first taken
it from them. A man might one day be presented with a sesterces and gorge
himself at a public feast, lauding Tiberius and Nero for handsome liberality,
who on the morrow, would be forced to abandon his property to their avarice,
his children to their lust, his very
blood to the cruelty of these magnificent emperors, without offering any more
resistance than a stone or a tree stump. The mob has always behaved in this way
– eagerly open to bribes . . . .
. . .
Summarizing Boétie’s views
on the maintenance of this particular social order, Murray Rothbard
- the editor to the 2015 edition of this book - explains that: “Hence, their stake in despotism does not
depend on illusion or habit or mystery; their stake is all too great and all
too real. A hierarchy of patronage from the fruits of plunder is thus created and
maintained: five or six individuals are the chief
advisors and beneficiaries of the favors of the king. These half-dozen in a
similar manner maintain six hundred ‘who profit under them,’ and the six
hundred in their turn ‘maintain under them six thousand, whom they promote in
rank, upon whom they confer the government of provinces or the direction of
finances, in order that they may serve as instruments of avarice and cruelty,
executing orders at the proper time and working such havoc all around that they
could not last except under the shadow of the six hundred.(p.28)
. . .
[W]hen the point is
reached, through big favors or little ones, that large profits or small are
obtained under a tyrant, there are found almost as many people to whom tyranny
seems advantageous as those to whom liberty would seem desirable . . . .
Whenever a ruler makes himself a dictator, all the wicked dregs of the nation .
. . all those who are corrupted by burning ambition or extraordinary avarice,
these gather around him and support him in order to have a share in the booty
and to constitute themselves petty chiefs under the big tyrant. (pp. 23-29)
Using these references, the argument was made that
science without ethics is not science, since the scientist
cannot exclude himself and his specific viewpoint as an element in the
experiment or observation undertaken. Werner Heizenberg’s
work in quantum physics at the end of the First world War and his insightful formulation of “The
Uncertainty Principle” is an illustration of this reality, namely that as observers we are
connected with what we observe – for better or for worse.
Intellectual cowardice at a time when the economic,
political and ideological debacle of the world capitalist system leaves more and more
people alienated, suspended like houseflys caught in a spider web, unable to
act in their own interests and unwilling to die. The knowledge of how to
dismantle the predator’s web remains beyond their comprehension as they are overcome by emotions of fear, then
despair.
For a contemporary scientific discussion of
Spinoza’s work, please see our references to the American neurologist, Dr. Antonio
Demasio, and his study of the human brain in the
February 14, 2010 issue the CEIMSA Bulletin @ http://www.ceimsa.org/archives/bull-437.html
The 15 items below testify to the instability
of this late imperialist period. The general panic on the part of a small
alliance, now crumbling into dust, is provoking violence to justify further
political repression that might forestall for a while longer the total
dissolution of imperial power and corporate capitalist class rule.
Francis
Feeley
Professor
emeritus of American Studies
University
Grenoble-Alpes
Director
of Research
University
of Paris-Nanterre
Center
for the Advanced Study of American Institutions and Social Movements
The
University of California-San Diego
a.
Long
Before Cambridge Analytica, a Belief in the ‘Power of
the Subliminal’
by
===========
b.
Exposed: Staged Suffering?
http://www.informationclearinghouse.info/49257.htm
Watch
Interview with boy in Douma video raises more
doubts over ‘chem attack’
Posted April 19, 2018
===========
c.
Rand Paul Says -
Possible Alleged Syrian Gas Attack
Was False Flag
http://www.informationclearinghouse.info/49268.htm
Watch
Posted April 20, 2018
===========
d.
The Great Game Comes to Syria
https://www.counterpunch.org/2018/04/20/the-great-game-comes-to-syria/
===========
e.
Cleanup Around
Damascus Continues
WMD Rumors Prepare For New U.S.
Attack
http://www.informationclearinghouse.info/49271.htm
by Moon O Alabama
After the Syrian army liberated Douma,
the next Takfiri held areas near the capital Damascus
fell in short order. The Jaish al-Islam militants in Dumayr, north-east of Damascus, gave up without a fight. As
usual by now the Takfiris were transferred to the
north-western Idleb governorate held by al-Qaeda and
other Turkish supported forces. The town of Dumayr
controls the Damascus Baghdad highway. Capitulation negotiations in the nearby
Eastern Qalamoun
are ongoing.
===========
f.
A Tale of Two Atrocities: Douma and Gaza
https://www.counterpunch.org/2018/04/20/a-tale-of-two-atrocities-douma-and-gaza/
The mainstream media once again have
enthusiastically endorsed Donald Trump’s latest strike
on Syria, pulled off without Congressional approval and in
blatant violation of US and international law. Reporting in
breathless detail the weapons used and the sites bombed, the mainstream media
seem to agree with President Trump that Syrian President Bashar
Assad is a “Gas Killing Animal” responsible for the ghastly deaths of
Syrian innocents in a chemical attack, one which demands swift, forceful
retaliation. This rush to judgment comes even as international
organizations have yet to conduct any formal investigations into the evidence
of what, if anything, happened in Douma
and who is responsible.
Now compare this intense media
coverage of the alleged Syrian chemical attacks to the near silence accorded
the horrific civilian massacre perpetrated by Israeli soldiers in Gaza, at the
very same time. The Gazan health ministry reports
that at least 34 unarmed Palestinians have been killed by Israeli forces over
the past weeks, with hundreds more injured during six weeks of planned
demonstrations titled the “Great March of Return.” which largely consisted
of tire-burning and prayer. Human Rights Watch denounced the
killings as “calculated” and “unlawful.” A video of an Israeli sniper
shooting an unarmed Palestinian man is but one example of the substantial
available evidence of this deliberate killing of innocent
civilians. After the sniper shoots the man, one of the soldiers
yells “yes!” and “son of a bitch!” in celebration as a crowd rushes toward the
body. Israel’s defense minister Avigdor
Lieberman rejected calls for an inquiry into these Israeli
killings of Palestinians, saying soldiers along the Gaza frontier
“deserve a medal” for what they did. The United States, rather than
labeling Lieberman a “killing animal,” instead blocked a Kuwait-drafted U.N.
Security Council statement that would have called for an independent
investigation. And the mainstream media says next to nothing.
===========
g.
The Palestinian women at the forefront
of Gaza's protests
by Mersiha
Gadzo & Anas
Jnena
In
socially conservative Gaza, women have been leading the Great Return March
movement, uniting all Palestinians.
===========
h.
The
Electronic Intifada
https://electronicintifada.net/
Israeli
massacres continue . . . .
===========
h.
Ruling
Class Operatives Say the Darndest Things: On Devils
Known and Not
“Solving
Other People’s Problems in the Middle East”
Establishment
journalists and politicos write and say the darndest things, advanced as common sense under the sway of reigning
nationalist and imperial ideology. Take the New York Times’ chief White House correspondent Peter
Baker. In a page-one “news analysis” last Sunday, Baker wrote the
following about Donald Trump’s recent missile strike on Syria:
“The
strike brought home Mr. Trump’s competing impulses when it comes to Syria — on
the one hand, his manful chest-thumping intended to demonstrate that he is the
toughest one on the international block, and on the other, his deep convictionthat American
involvement in the Middle East since the attacks of Sept. 11, 2001, has been a
waste of blood and treasure….He did little to reconcile those impulses with his
retaliatory strike to punish the government of President Bashar al-Assad for a suspected chemical
attack a week ago that killed dozens of people. But then again, he
reflected the contradictions of an American public that is tired of trying to solve other people’s
problems in the Middle East….” (emphasis
added).
The
sheer tonnage of bullshit contained in this short passage is striking. Baker
lacked the decency to note that (as everybody knows) Trump’s missile spasm was
intended to distract U.S. public attention from his troubled political
situation at home. It was a transparent dog-wag that worked for a day or two.
===========
i.
Fooled
again? Trump Trade Policy Elevates Corporate Power
https://www.counterpunch.org/2018/04/20/fooled-again-trump-trade-policy-elevates-corporate-power/
Given
the Trump administration’s all-out war on working people, a government by
billionaires and for billionaires considerably more blatant in its class
warfare than the ordinary White House, it has long puzzled me that some
activists insist on giving it the benefit of the doubt when it comes to trade
issues.
===========
j.
Protest
& Political Activity Increases
https://zcomm.org/znetarticle/protest-political-activity-increases/
by
Kevin Zeese
People have noted that the last year
has seen an escalation of protest activity in the United States. Many of these
protests are generated by opposition to Donald Trump, e.g. protests against
immigration policies, and many have partisan leanings, e.g. the Women’s March,
the March for Science and others were brought on by events or circumstances,
e.g. the March or Our Lives against gun violence. Protests began on the weekend
of Donald Trump’s Inauguration, indeed there may have
been more protesters at the inauguration than supporters of the president.
The Washington
Post has conducted a poll that measures how widespread political action has
been in the Trump era. The poll was conducted in the first two months of this
year among a random telephone sample of 1,850 adults nationwide, including 832
who attended a protest or rally in the last two years. The Post reports, “Tens
of millions of Americans have joined protests and rallies in the past two
years, their activism often driven by admiration or outrage toward President
Trump, according to a Washington
Post-Kaiser Family Foundation poll . . .”
===========
k.
A Bloody Water War Rages in Mexico as Irate Residents
Vow to Halt
Corona Brewery Construction
https://themindunleashed.com/2018/01/mexicali-water-constellation-brands-beer.html
A
battle the people of the United States should watch like hawks continues to
unfold in Mexicali, the capital of Mexico’s Baja California, over water claims,
privatization, and an existential question particularly poignant and raw to
Indigenous Peoples and Native American tribes across the continent — who has a
right to clean, potable water?
Is
water even a right?
Add
the possibility a region sorely in need would see 750 permanent jobs, and this
battle — whether or not Constellation Brands should be permitted to construct a
government-endorsed, $1 billion state-of-the-art brewing facility for its
various Modelo and Corona beer brands — has exploded
into a hostile
and bloody
showdown between law enforcement and irate residents concerned for area farmers
over the possibility of dwindling water supplies.
===========
l.
Rashid
Khalidi: The Israeli Security Establishment Is
Terrified
of a Nonviolent Palestinian Movement
https://www.democracynow.org/2018/4/19/rashid_khalidi_the_israeli_security_establishment
Interview with Rashid Khalidi
Edward
Said professor of Arab studies at Columbia University. He’s the author of
several books. His most recent is titled Brokers of Deceit: How the U.S. Has
Undermined Peace in the Middle East.
Palestinian protests against the Israeli occupation
are continuing this week as Israel begins to mark the country’s 70th
anniversary of its founding in 1948. According to the Palestinian Ministry of
Health in Gaza, Israeli forces have killed 33 Palestinian protesters over the
past three weeks since the “Great March of Return” protests began to
commemorate the mass expulsion of Palestinians during Israel’s establishment.
Palestinian authorities estimate nearly 4,300 Palestinians
have been injured in the peaceful protests—many were shot with live ammunition
or rubber-coated steel bullets. Gaza authorities have also accused Israel of
deliberately targeting journalists and medics. Since the protests began, one
journalist—Yaser Murtaja—was
killed, and 66 journalists were injured. In addition, 44 medics have been
wounded, and 19 ambulances were reportedly targeted. The protest marches are
set to last to until May 15, recognized as the official Israeli Independence
Day. Palestinians mark the date as Nakba Day, or “Day of the Catastrophe.” For more, we’re joined by
Rashid Khalidi, Edward Said professor of Arab studies
at Columbia University. He’s the author of several books, his most recent
titled “Brokers of Deceit: How the U.S. Has Undermined Peace in the Middle
East.”
===========
m.
From: "BBlum6"
<bblum6@aol.com>
Sent: Thursday, 19 April, 2018
Anti-Empire Report
#157
https://williamblum.org/aer/read/157
===========
n.
The U.S. Role in the
Destruction of Syria
http://www.informationclearinghouse.info/49267.htm
by David Ray Griffin
(Excerpt from Chapter 6, "Global Chaos," of Bush and Cheney: How They Ruined
America and the World
[Interlink Books, 2017])
In Syria, the goal of creating chaos has
succeeded in spades. Mnar Muhawesh
wrote: [F]oreign powers have sunk the nation into a
nightmare combination of civil war, foreign invasion and terrorism. Syrians are
in the impossible position of having to choose between living in a warzone,
being targeted by groups like ISIS and the Syrian government’s brutal crack-
down, or faring dangerous waters with minimal safety equipment only to be
denied food, water and safety by European governments if they reach shore.
Of course, many Syrians were unable, or
chose not to try, to reach Europe. Continuing her discussion of the refugee
crisis created by the destabilization of Syria, Muhawesh
added: Other Syrians seeing the chaos at home have turned to neighboring Arab Muslim
countries. Jordan alone has absorbed over half a million Syrian refugees;
Lebanon has accepted nearly 1.5 million; and Iraq and Egypt have taken in
several hundred thousand. . . . Turkey has [by 2015] taken in nearly 2 million
refugees.(p.55)
By the end of 2015, the conflict in Syria
had “displaced 12 million people, creating the largest wave of refugees to hit
Europe since World War II.”(p.56)
Planning to Destabilize
Syria
Some neocons had come into office with preformed ideas about
destabilizing Syria. As mentioned earlier, Richard Perle
and other neocons had prepared a 1996 paper for
Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu, en- titled “A Clean Break: A New
Strategy for Securing the Realm.” It suggested that Israel seek peace with some
neighbors while beginning to topple the regimes of its enemies, especially
Iraq, Iran, and Syria. Although regime change in Iraq would be the first goal,
it would be achieved primarily for the sake of “weakening, containing, and even
rolling back Syria,” ultimately overthrowing Bashar
al-Assad. In other words, the road to Damascus would run through Baghdad.(p.57)
===========
o.
Yanis Varoufakis: Marx predicted our present crisis -
and points the way out
https://www.theguardian.com/news/2018/apr/20/yanis-varoufakis-marx-crisis-communist-manifesto
by Yantis Varoufakis
The Communist Manifesto foresaw the predatory and polarised global capitalism of the 21st century. But Marx and Engels also showed us that we have the power to create a better world.
For a manifesto to succeed, it must speak to our hearts like a poem while infecting the mind with images and ideas that are dazzlingly new. It needs to open our eyes to the true causes of the bewildering, disturbing, exciting changes occurring around us, exposing the possibilities with which our current reality is pregnant. It should make us feel hopelessly inadequate for not having recognised these truths ourselves, and it must lift the curtain on the unsettling realisation that we have been acting as petty accomplices, reproducing a dead-end past. Lastly, it needs to have the power of a Beethoven symphony, urging us to become agents of a future that ends unnecessary mass suffering and to inspire humanity to realise its potential for authentic freedom.
No manifesto has better succeeded in doing all this than the one published in February 1848 at 46 Liverpool Street, London. Commissioned by English revolutionaries, The Communist Manifesto (or the Manifesto of the Communist Party, as it was first published) was authored by two young Germans – Karl Marx, a 29-year-old philosopher with a taste for epicurean hedonism and Hegelian rationality, and Friedrich Engels, a 28-year-old heir to a Manchester mill.
As a work of political literature, the manifesto remains unsurpassed. Its most infamous lines, including the opening one (“A spectre is haunting Europe – the spectre of communism”), have a Shakespearean quality. Like Hamlet confronted by the ghost of his slain father, the reader is compelled to wonder: “Should I conform to the prevailing order, suffering the slings and arrows of the outrageous fortune bestowed upon me by history’s irresistible forces? Or should I join these forces, taking up arms against the status quo and, by opposing it, usher in a brave new world?”