Bulletin N° 917
“How Big Oil Conquered the World”
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Q6r8nkxCKO4
November 2018
by James Corbett
(1:32:35)
+
“Why Big Oil Conquered the World”
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=0xrB4qxM2K0
February 2019
by James Corbett
(1:53:00)
Subject: Out
of the ashes of Capitalism arises . . . ?
August 2, 2020
Grenoble, France
Dear Colleagues and Friends of CEIMSA,
Fundamental
to modern marketing is the technique: “To create a problem; then sell the
remedy.” The various national security policies sold to the public since the
Vietnam War era – the War on Drugs, the War on Terrorism, the War on Islam, the
War on Covid-19 – all speak to the
desperate effort to create new capital investment opportunities that can
guarantee high profits for the owners.
William
R. Polk’s study, Crusade
and Jihad (2018) places in its historical context this imperialist
problematic of the past one thousand years, offering insights into the
capacities of militarism and nationalism as useful ideologies that have served
to perpetuate class rule, even in pre-capitalist times of empire building. In
the third part of this book, titled “The Shift to Secular Nationalism,” the author
discusses the North-South conflict before the turn of the last century, when
the Christian West intensified its military expansion into the southern
hemisphere, preparing to rob the “sick man of Europe” (the Ottoman Empire) of
its territorial possessions in the Muslim world. At this point, the rise of a “secular
ideology” within the ruling classes on both sides of the struggle found fertile
ground in which to take root.
The outbreak of the First World War in
August 1914 caught the Allies with major conflicting interests and unresolved
disputes that had arisen from the competition for empire. In Asia, India was
the ultimate prize. Britain had it, and Russia was
pushing steadily toward it. So, during most of the previous century, the two
imperial powers had often been on the point of hostilities. We may think of the
‘front’ in this cold war as a band running form the Mediterranean across the Black
Sea and through Afghanistan toward China. So, starting from the west, Britain
was determined to keep the Russian fleet bottled up in the Black Sea. To do
that, the British had to keep the Turkish straits out of Russian control. And
to do that, they had to keep the ‘sick man of Europe,’ as they thought of the
Ottoman Empire, at least alive. This had been the major reason for Britain’s
1839-1840 destruction of the growing power of Mehmet
Ali Pasha of Egypt. When he attacked the Ottoman Empire, he threatened to upset
the strategic balance. British action against Mehmet
Ali did not stop the Russians.
Fear of Russian ‘aggression’ was a major cause of the 1853-1856 Crimean
War. For the Russians, that war had been humiliating. Russian Generals reacted
by striking out at the targets they could reach in Central Asia and the Caucasus
. . . . But Russian statesmen never gave up the dream of India. Russian and
British soldiers and adventurers probed at one another for a generation
throughout the middle of the nineteenth century in the covert war we know as
the Great Game.
The Great Game was the heady stuff of romance, and the public loved the
tales of derring-do, but it truly was a game: it amounted to little in real
terms. Real war came close when Russian armies crashed into and conquered Panjdeh province in Afghanistan in 1885. Panjdeh was the last step in a twenty-year series of
Russian advances through Central Asia toward India. Incorporating it in the
Russian Empire upset the strategic balance, or so the British thought. They
regarded Afghanistan as the anchor of British policy in the east, just as the
Ottoman Empire was the bulwark of the west. Britain was determined to keep both
of them out of Russian hands.
Russo-British conflict over these weak states was inevitable. Even when
relations at the top, among the emperors (who were all cousins), were cordial,
and even when both governments felt threatened by what they saw as the
possibility of an uprising of the Muslim people they had conquered, their
statesman and generals regarded one another as enemies. In short, during most of
the century before the outbreak of the First World War, Russian saw Brittain as
a duplicitous, avaricious, and cunning rival, while the English saw Russia as
the Cossack on horseback, riding south toward India, and, at least in the
popular imagination, as an Asiatic tyranny, not a member of civilized Europe
but the heir to Genghis Khan’s Mongols. To convert imperial Russia from an
enemy into an ally would be Britain’s major diplomatic challenge at the
outbreak of the First World War.
British hostility to the Russians in Asia was mirrored in Africa, where
the ambitions of the British and French clashed. It began when Napoleon
conquered Egypt. He had planned to use it as a base of operations against the
British, who had taken away the French colonies in India during the French
Revolution. [Note: In fact, these colonies were lost before the French
Revolution, after the British victory over the French in America in 1763.] On
the heels of Napoleon, the British invaded Egypt and forced the French
withdrawal. Thwarted in the east, France set to work acquiring an empire in
North Africa, beginning with the conquest of Algeria in 1830. The French then
moved south and east into Senegal in the 1850s and pushed into the interior,
creating what became known as Equatorial or sub-Saharan Africa.
An attempt was made by Chancellor Otto von Bismarck of Germany in 1884
to head off conflict among the European powers by clarifying the ambitions of
Britain and France in Central Africa and recognizing the claims of Belgium,
Portugal, and Germany farther south. The conference he
assembled of their rulers and statesmen did not result in a treaty and did not
stop either Britain or France. Their ‘scramble for Africa’ was what Bismarck,
at least in his public stance, had tried to get them to avoid. Each was
energized by the impulse of imperialism, the ambitions of its officials, and
the clamoring of the public to forge ahead.
The French had tried to cooperate with Britain in 1882 to invade Egypt,
but they pulled back from the joint invasion and consequently watched Britain
emerge with another rich colony. The French felt cheated and came to view Egypt
somewhat like the Russians had viewed India: a wallet in the pocket of the
British Empire. How to get Egypt back into play in the game of international
strategy was a sort of upside-down African version of the Anglo-Russian
competition in Asia. It was the subject of power plays, shifting alliances, and
threats of war for at least a generation. In hindsight we can see that the fears
that drove all three of the imperial powers were largely imaginary. Perhaps the
most absurd of all was the British fear that France was positioning itself in
Central Africa to starve Egypt.
The British professed to believe that France was thrusting across Africa
to establish a base on the White Nile where it could build a dam to chock off
the waters of the Nile on which Egypt depended. Such a task was then far beyond
the capacity of any country. Indeed, it still is. But fear of French
imperialism played well in the press, and the British government exploited it
to push ahead with its own aims in the Nile valley. British officials and the
press imagined a huge French army plunging across Africa to the Nile to attack
Egypt from the south. This incredible appreciation of British intelligence was
an echo of the British belief that a Russian Cossack army was always ready to
race down across mountains and deserts to attack India. The reality of Africa
was that in 1898 the French managed, in months of exhausting marches in which
they hacked their way through jungles and struggled across deserts, to get 120
Senegalese auxiliaries (tirailleurs) and half
a dozen French officers to the little village of Fashoda
on the Nile. Their exhaustion and the British government’s declarations forced
the French to admit publically that they had no power on the Nile. The French
withdrew. But the very absurdity of their bellicose statements confirmed the underlying
hostility of the two imperial powers.(pp.194-196)
Polk goes
on to explain how the internecine struggle between the European powers was
transcended by the fear of Muslim revolt against the imperialists.
Despite their differences, Britain, France,
and Russia each had a strong reason to cooperate with one another. When the
Ottoman Empire called for a holy war, each of the imperial powers expected
revolts: Britain in India and Egypt, France in North Africa, and Russia in the
Caucasus and Central Asia. Each ruled over millions of Muslims, and each was warned
by its security services that the Muslims were ‘seething.’ Each expected an upsurge
of nationalism – whether ethnic as in ‘Pan-Turkism’ or religious as in ‘Pan-Islamism’
– and regarded it, at least before the terrible battles of the war, as even more
dangerous than its European adversaries. Fear of jihad was augmented by
imperial ambition. In varying degrees, all three powers were affected by both fear
and greed, but it was Britain that played the lead role.(pp.198-199)
. . .
Before the war had actually broken
out and the idea of the Sykes-Picot Agreement had been conceived, the British
government in India and the British administration of Egypt were establishing
their own policy. It would lead to the second of the three sets of actions
Britain initiated during the First World War. We should think of it as the
southern strategy.
The southern stagey was a tactical modification of the longtime imperial
policy. The modification had two objectives: the first was to block an
anticipated attack of Ottoman forces, which presumably would aim to close the
Suez Canal in the West; and damage or cut the pipeline from the Masjed Soleiman oil field in
southwest Iran to the Persian Gulf port, thus potentially immobilizing the
Royal Navy. If these anticipated actions succeeded, Britain feared that it
might lose the war. So even before war spread to the Middle East, the British
sent a task force of the Indian army to seize the outlet to the Persian Gulf
and augmented their forces in Egypt.
.
. .
The
first and second aspects of British strategy during the war were not the end of
the story. The first led . . . to the establishment of a new agreement between
the victorious allies; the second strategy proved to have generated forces
among those it sought to rule that became too expensive for Britain and France
to maintain, at least in the traditional form of imperialism. It was the third
line of strategy, the promotion of Zionism, that would prove to be the one the
British could not control.(pp.205-208)
The
ideology of nationalism slowly expanded from the northern hemisphere into the
South. The agents of this expansion included newly indoctrinated Jews carrying
the convictions of Zionism, which served British ruling class interests
at the time. Polk describes the popular mobilization around British imperialist
aims in the Middle East following the First World War in Chapter 20, “Palestine,
the Much Promised Land.”
Palestine brings into sharp focus and adds a new dimension to the
relationship of the North and the South. This is because the cause was in Europe,
while the result was in the Middle East. Zionism, which is bitterly opposed by
the natives of Palestine, was a response to savage and long-established
European anti-Semitism.
No European society treated Jews as full members, and most exhibited
generations or even centuries of nearly always ugly and often vicious treatment
of Jews. Even relatively benign governments exploited, segregated, or banished Jews
(and such other minorities as Gypsies, Muslims, and deviant Christians). Less
benign governments encouraged pogroms and tolerated or practiced mass murder. Northern
history reveals a pervasive, powerful, and nearly perpetual record of
intolerance of all forms of ethnic, cultural, and religious difference. There
were periods of relative tolerance, but they were sporadic and unpredictable as
generation followed generation. In the later years of the nineteenth century,
anti-Semitism increased in virulence as large numbers of Ashkenazi Jews moved
westward from Russia into Poland, Austria, Germany, and France. Flight did not save
them. As one early Zionist, referring to the massive migration of Jews from Russia
and Poland to Western Europe, said, ‘The Jew carried anti-Semitism on his back
wherever he went.”
Jews also were affected by the currents of nationalism and, like the
Egyptians, Iranians, Turks, Berbers, and Arabs, began to think of themselves as
a ‘nation.’ Whereas before they had occasionally sought a temporary haven (a nachtaysl), they began to seek what Theodor Herzl
called a Judenstaat. Herzl and his followers
believed that having a separate, faith-based nation-state would be a permanent
solution to anti-Semitism. This was the essential aim and justification for
Zionism. The president of the Anglo-Jewish Association, Claude Montefiore, spoke to the group in London on November 30 1917,
saying, ‘The Zionist movement [to create a nation-state] was caused by
anti-Semitism.’
Nineteenth-century Europeans and Russians understood and approved of the
concept of the nation-state. The French, Germans, Italians, and various
communities in the Balkans were reforming and rethinking themselves into ‘nations.’
Not surprisingly, Zionists – at first vigorously opposed by the other Jews –
decided to do as the Europeans were doing, getting for themselves a territory
on which to found a state. Europeans, who were pleased to get rid of their Jews,
suggested various possible sites. Usually the areas offered was far away and in
someone else’s territory – Argentina, Australia, Manchuria, or East, North, and
West Africa. Only the Russians offered a place in their own territory. But the
only one on which the Zionists could agree was the Holy Land. To encourage them
to focus only on Palestine, Israel Zangwill coined a description of their aim
and the land of Palestine as ‘a country without a people for a people without a
land.’
Unfortunately, while Zangwill’s was a powerful slogan, it masked a different
reality. Given the technology available at the time, the scarcity of water, and
the relative poverty of the inhabitants, Palestine was already densely
populated. For comparison, it had about five times the contemporary population
density of the United States. Until massive amounts of money and new technologies
became available in the 1930s, population and land were in balance but at a
lower level than in wetter, richer areas.
Herzl’s and Zangwill’s words
disturbed the imperialists
and particularly the English. They were willing to help the Jews
set up a colony, which might be militarily useful and perhaps even profitable,
but they were uneasy about the establishment in the South of a truly independent
state. Three answers to the anticipated objections were tried: First, Herzl
himself had stressed that a Jewish state would be a ‘rampart of Europe against
Asia, an outpost of civilization against barbarians.’ That is, they would
become allies in the great imperialist task the English and French had assumed, the white man’s burden of the mission civilisatrice. The second answer was to deny that
Zionism aimed to create a state. Nahum Sokolow, then
the general secretary of the Zionist Organization, wrote in Die Welt on
January 22, 1909, ‘There was no truth whatever in the allegation that Zionism
aimed at the establishment of an independent Jewish State.’ The third effort to
win support was to cater to the English fear of Jewish immigration. In his
presidential address at the Tenth Zionist Congress in 1911, David Wolffsohn proclaimed the aim of Zionism to be ‘not a Jewish
State but a homeland.’ This homeland would deflect at least some of the
millions of Jews who had fled Russia to settle far away from England and thus
avoid compromising its established Jewish community or competing against
English laborers.
So the decision was reached to downplay the German word for state, staat, as in Judenstaat,
and substitute for it the word heimstatt, a ‘homeland.’
It suggested something less than a state. In that spirit, the early Zionist Leo
Pinsker described the Zionist aim to be the formation
of a ‘colonist community,’ a kolonistengemeinwesen.
The Hebrew equivalent of the German word for a colonist community was given by Chaim Weizmann as the Yishuv.
Thus was born the concept set out in the 1917 Belfour Declaration of a ‘national
home for the Jewish people’ in Palestine.
The British government was not fooled. Two ministers spoke out, but in
the privacy of the cabinet. Lord Kitchener commented that it was unrealistic to
think that the half a million Arabic-speaking Palestinians would be content to
play the role Jews had assigned to their ancestors the Canaanites, as ‘hewers
of wood and drawers of water.’ And Lord Balfour, the author of the Balfour
Declaration, told his colleagues on August 11, 1919, that ‘as far as Palestine
is concerned, the Powers [that is, Britain and France] have made no statement
of fact which is not admittedly wrong, and no declaration of policy which at
least by letter, they have, not always intended to violate.’ Unmoved, the
British government, which was in occupation of Palestine, created a civil administration
on July 1, 1920. To implement the Balfour Declaration, it appointed a well-known
English Zionist, Sir Herbert Samuel, as the civil commissioner. His first task
was to begin large-scale immigration of Jews. It was not until two years later,
on July 24n 1922, that the Council of the League of Nations approved a mandate
for Britain in Palestine. Meanwhile, although without League and Nation
approval, British policy was being implemented.
The attitude of the British administration
toward the Palestinians was set out in a (British) government of Palestine
memorandum some years later:
The Arabs of Palestine are
predominantly Moslem in religion. Generally speaking their outlook is Asiatic;
they are traditionalist, and by Western standards are inclined to place the
transcendental before the practical. Their pride in the possession of a common
language affords a tie with all parts of the Arab world which is a factor which
should not be underestimated. Although by tradition feudal, and hence somewhat
lacking in cohesion, they were not, however, unaffected by the impulse to
self-determination which made itself apparent in the provinces of the Ottoman
Empire in the early days of the present century and this has left its mark on
their political thought and conduct.... The bulk of the Arab community is
composed of peasants and small land-owners, hard-headed and stubborn and with a
profound sense of attachment to the land.
At the beginning of the British mandate, the Palestinians had not yet caught
the bug of nationalism. They were divided by religion, residence, and wealth.
Most of the eight hundred thousand Arabic-speaking natives were villagers who,
like their neighbors in Egypt and Syria, thought of their village s as their ‘nations,’
their warans. The eighty thousand resident Jews
were mostly pilgrims or merchants and lived mainly in Jerusalem or Haifa.
.
. .
The Muslim community was relatively homogenous, but it lacked the
experience of managing many of its affairs. Its schools and clinics were state
organizations, and it had no recognized leaders other than Ottoman officials.
Also, unlike the Christians and Jews, both of whom had generations of experience
in dealing with foreigners, Muslims had no experience in external relations or
ties with foreigners. At every level, foreign relations had been the prerogative
of the Ottoman Empire. Unlike Christians and Jews, Muslims were not a ‘nation’;
they were integrated into the population of the emprie.(pp.219-223)
William
Polk’s focus in secular nationalism in the matrix of aggressive imperialist
expansion serves as a warning today of what awaits us in the event of a political
vacuum created by total economic and social collapse.
The 22 + items below are selected essays and articles
that reflect the legitimacy crisis of the ruling class, whose poverty of ideas
is visible for all to see. This sobering encounter should suffice to alert us
to the need to formulate our own ideas about our needs and future well being.
Our strength lies in our bonds with one another and our mutual respect for
self-determination, as the rulers of failing capitalist society appear to be
without hope and intent on self-annihilation.
Sincerely,
Francis Feeley
___
Professeur honoraire de l'Université Grenoble-Alpes
Ancien Directeur de
Researches
Université de Paris-Nanterre
Director of The Center for the Advanced Study
of American Institutions and Social Movements
(CEIMSA-in-Exile)
The University of California-San Diego
http://www.ceimsa.org
a.
USA must drop charges against Julian Assange
https://www.amnesty.org/en/get-involved/take-action/julian-assange-usa-justice/
Authorities
in the USA must drop the espionage and all other charges against Julian Assange that relate to his publishing activities as part of
his work with Wikileaks. The US government’s unrelenting
pursuit of Julian Assange for having published
disclosed documents that included possible war crimes committed by the US
military is nothing short of a full-scale assault on the right to freedom of
expression.
Julian Assange is currently being held at Belmarsh,
a high security prison in the UK, on the basis of a US extradition request on
charges that stem directly from the publication of disclosed documents as part
of his work with Wikileaks. Amnesty International
strongly opposes any possibility of Julian Assange
being extradited or sent in any other manner to the USA. There, he faces a real
risk of serious human rights violations including possible detention conditions
that would amount to torture and other ill-treatment (such as prolonged solitary
confinement). The fact that he was the target of a negative public campaign by
US officials at the highest levels undermines his right to be presumed innocent
and puts him at risk of an unfair trial.
Julian Assange’s publication of disclosed documents as part of his
work with Wikileaks should not be punishable as this
activity mirrors conduct that investigative journalists undertake regularly in
their professional capacity. Prosecuting Julian Assange
on these charges could have a chilling effect on the right to freedom of
expression, leading journalists to self-censor from fear of prosecution.
Sign the petition now and protect the right to freedom of
expression.
+
UK Refuses to Release Information on Assange
Judge Who Has 96 Percent Approval Rate in Extradition Cases
by Mark Curtis and Matt Kennard
===========
b.
Fact
Check: Progressive Hero Margaret Sanger Was a Racist Eugenicist
https://www.corbettreport.com/
with
James Corbett
(25:20)
+
Where Do We Go
from Here?
http://www.informationclearinghouse.info/55336.htm
by Howard Brand
It is quite clear to me that the current ruling
class has no intention of giving up their ruling position without a concerted
fight.
+
Keith Knight and
James Corbett Dissect Voluntary Servitude
(46:08)
+
Worst Decline on
Record for US
with Richard Wolff
(10:00)
+
The Camo Economy: How Military Contracting Hides Human Costs
and Increases Inequality
http://www.informationclearinghouse.info/55338.htm
by Heidi
Peltier
High profits allow military contractors to pay high
wages, which contributes to rising inequality. While the average wage across
all occupations in the U.S. last year was about $53,000, at
Lockheed Martin the average wage was about $115,000, over twice as much.
+
A revolutionary nonviolence view on US uprisings
https://wagingnonviolence.org/wr/2020/07/revolutionary-nonviolence-view-on-us-uprisings/
What we are seeing on the streets are not “peaceful”
but rather nonviolent protests seeking to confront and disrupt the violence of
U.S. police.
===========
c.
DARPA’s Man in Wuhan
https://unlimitedhangout.com/2020/07/investigative-reports/darpas-man-in-wuhan/
by Raul Diego
Michael Callahan’s career began in USAID and in the bioweapons labs of the former Soviet Union, advancing the
agenda of the global bioweapons and pharmaceutical
cartels. He would take what he learned there to execute a massive expansion of
DARPA’s biodefense portfolio and today finds himself
squarely in the center of the origins of the coronavirus
pandemic.
+
Perspectives
on the Pandemic
(1
of 3) | Episode #10
https://www.youtube.com/watch?feature=youtu.be&v=1vlKvogP6vk&app=desktop
with Judy
Mikovits & Robert Kennedy Jr.
(1:12:31)
+
Local TV stations across the country set to air
discredited 'Plandemic' researcher's conspiracy
theory about Fauci
https://edition.cnn.com/2020/07/24/media/sinclair-fauci-conspiracy-bolling/index.html
by Oliver Darcy, CNN Business
+
From
Bioethics to Eugenics
https://hive.blog/news/@corbettreport/from-bioethics-to-eugenics
by James Corbett
===========
d.
The Impossible
Dream
https://consortiumnews.com/2020/07/13/the-impossible-dream/
by
Michael Brenner
The former national
security adviser reveals a national goal that is simple and blunt:
American dominance of the world, writes Michael Brenner.
+
Edward
Bernays and Group Psychology: “Manipulating the
Masses”
(11:50)
+
Racism, Sexism, Classism: Incoherence of
‘Mainstream’ Ethical Debate. Obfuscating Crimes against Humanity
https://www.globalresearch.ca/racism-sexism-classism-incoherence-mainstream-ethical-debate/5719938
by
Media Lens
===========
e.
Media
consolidation runs wild in free enterprise system
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Q2GrV5PIYh4
with
Larry King
(6:44)
+
'Cancel Culture' hypocrites cancel open debate and
foreign countries
with
Max Blumenthal and Aaron Maté
(32:31)
+
Foundations Fund Phony
'Left' Media Gatekeepers
(Link to the chart of foundations
funding "left" media gatekeepers:)
https://rense.com/1.imagesH/fund.htm
+
From: Mark Crispin Miller
Sent: Wednesday,
July 15, 2020
Subject: [MCM] Bari Weiss resigns from the Social Justice Police
Gazette, a/k/a the New York Times
Kudos
to Bari Weiss, for sticking with her principles, and quitting the Gray Lady's
faux-left cult.
She's
not the only Times survivor fed up with that paper's suffocating
groupthink and abysmal
journalism. Here, again,
is what former Timesman Alex Berenson had to say
about the paper.
On
the Times' fierce promotion of the lockdown policy, Alex wrote:
I
think this is a very strong effort by the public health establishment to beat
down any questions about the efficacy and side effects of lockdowns, an
effort abetted and even driven by places like the Times. Nearly the entire
media is on board here, and the issue has become incredibly politicized. When I
worked for the Times, it leaned left, but it was basically center-left, a
voice of the establishment, and the bias was more in the story selection
than anything else. Reporters were expected to (and did) write with relative
objectivity, avoid snark and opinion, make sure they gave the subjects of articles or the targets
of investigations a chance to respond.
We
knew the rules and we basically followed them. Didn't mean we couldn't write
strong investigative pieces (I wrote plenty), but we didn't have politics
on every page. That's gone now.
As
for myself—longtime Times subscriber,
and author of four Times op
eds, and co-author of a fifth—I
find myself wishing every day that I could spare myself the
agony of scanning it; but, as a student of propaganda, I have an intellectual
and civic duty to peruse it, so I have to suck it up, in hopes of getting
others to perceive how really bad it is.
MCM
Resignation
Letter
https://www.bariweiss.com/resignation-letter
Dear A.G.,
It is with sadness that I write to tell you that I am resigning
from The New York Times.
I joined the paper with gratitude and optimism three years ago. I
was hired with the goal of bringing in voices that would not otherwise appear
in your pages: first-time writers, centrists, conservatives and others who
would not naturally think of The Times as their home.
The reason for this effort was clear: The paper’s failure to anticipate the
outcome of the 2016 election meant that it didn’t have a firm grasp of the
country it covers. Dean Baquet and others have
admitted as much on various occasions. The priority in Opinion was to help
redress that critical shortcoming.
I was honored to be part of that effort, led by James Bennet. I am proud of my work as a writer and as an editor.
Among those I helped bring to our pages: the Venezuelan dissident Wuilly Arteaga; the Iranian chess
champion Dorsa Derakhshani; and the Hong Kong
Christian democrat Derek Lam. Also: Ayaan Hirsi Ali, Masih Alinejad, Zaina Arafat, Elna Baker, Rachael Denhollander,
Matti Friedman, Nick Gillespie, Heather Heying, Randall Kennedy, Julius Krein,
Monica Lewinsky, Glenn Loury, Jesse Singal, Ali Soufan, Chloe Valdary, Thomas Chatterton Williams, Wesley Yang, and many
others.
But the lessons that ought to have followed the election—lessons
about the importance of understanding other Americans, the necessity of
resisting tribalism, and the centrality of the free exchange of ideas to a
democratic society—have not been learned. Instead, a new consensus has emerged
in the press, but perhaps especially at this paper: that truth isn’t a process
of collective discovery, but an orthodoxy already known to an enlightened few
whose job is to inform everyone else.
Twitter is not on the masthead of The New York Times. But Twitter
has become its ultimate editor. As the ethics and mores of that platform have
become those of the paper, the paper itself has increasingly become a kind of
performance space. Stories are chosen and told in a way to satisfy the
narrowest of audiences, rather than to allow a curious public to read about the
world and then draw their own conclusions. I was always taught that journalists
were charged with writing the first rough draft of history. Now, history itself
is one more ephemeral thing molded to fit the needs of a predetermined
narrative.
My own forays into Wrongthink have made
me the subject of constant bullying by colleagues who disagree with my views.
They have called me a Nazi and a racist; I have learned to brush off comments
about how I’m “writing about the Jews again.” Several colleagues perceived to
be friendly with me were badgered by coworkers. My work and my character are
openly demeaned on company-wide Slack channels where masthead editors regularly
weigh in. There, some coworkers insist I need to be rooted out if this company
is to be a truly “inclusive” one, while others post ax emojis
next to my name. Still other New York Times employees publicly smear me as a
liar and a bigot on Twitter with no fear that harassing me will be met with
appropriate action. They never are.
There are terms for all of this: unlawful discrimination, hostile
work environment, and constructive discharge. I’m no legal expert. But I know
that this is wrong.
I do not understand how you have allowed this kind of behavior to go
on inside your company in full view of the paper’s entire staff and the public.
And I certainly can’t square how you and other Times leaders have stood by
while simultaneously praising me in private for my courage. Showing up for work
as a centrist at an American newspaper should not require bravery.
Part of me wishes I could say that my experience was unique. But
the truth is that intellectual curiosity—let alone risk-taking—is now a
liability at The Times. Why edit something challenging
to our readers, or write something bold only to go through the numbing process
of making it ideologically kosher, when we can assure ourselves of job security
(and clicks) by publishing our 4000th op-ed arguing that Donald Trump is a
unique danger to the country and the world? And so self-censorship has become
the norm.
What rules that remain at The Times are
applied with extreme selectivity. If a person’s ideology is in keeping with the
new orthodoxy, they and their work remain unscrutinized.
Everyone else lives in fear of the digital thunderdome.
Online venom is excused so long as it is directed at the proper targets.
Op-eds that would have easily been
published just two years ago would now get an editor or a writer in serious
trouble, if not fired. If a piece is perceived as likely to inspire backlash
internally or on social media, the editor or writer avoids pitching it. If she
feels strongly enough to suggest it, she is quickly steered to safer ground.
And if, every now and then, she succeeds in getting a piece published that does
not explicitly promote progressive causes, it happens only after every line is
carefully massaged, negotiated and caveated.
It took the paper two days and two jobs to say that the Tom Cotton
op-ed “fell short of our standards.” We attached an editor’s note on a travel
story about Jaffa shortly after it was published because it “failed to touch on
important aspects of Jaffa’s makeup and its history.” But there is still none
appended to Cheryl Strayed’s fawning interview with
the writer Alice Walker, a proud anti-Semite who believes in lizard
Illuminati.
The paper of record is, more and more, the record of those living
in a distant galaxy, one whose concerns are profoundly removed from the lives
of most people. This is a galaxy in which, to choose just a few recent
examples, the Soviet space program is lauded for its “diversity”; the doxxing of teenagers in the name of justice is condoned;
and the worst caste systems in human history includes the United States
alongside Nazi Germany.
Even now, I am confident that most people at The
Times do not hold these views. Yet they are cowed by those who do. Why? Perhaps
because they believe the ultimate goal is righteous. Perhaps because they
believe that they will be granted protection if they nod along as the coin of
our realm—language—is degraded in service to an ever-shifting laundry list of
right causes. Perhaps because there are millions of unemployed people in this
country and they feel lucky to have a job in a contracting industry.
Or perhaps it is because they know that, nowadays, standing up for
principle at the paper does not win plaudits. It puts a target on your back.
Too wise to post on Slack, they write to me privately about the “new
McCarthyism” that has taken root at the paper of record.
All this bodes ill, especially for independent-minded young
writers and editors paying close attention to what they’ll have to do to
advance in their careers. Rule One: Speak your mind at your own peril. Rule
Two: Never risk commissioning a story that goes against the narrative. Rule
Three: Never believe an editor or publisher who urges you to go against the
grain. Eventually, the publisher will cave to the mob, the editor will get
fired or reassigned, and you’ll be hung out to dry.
For these young writers and editors, there is one consolation. As
places like The Times and other once-great journalistic institutions betray
their standards and lose sight of their principles, Americans still hunger for
news that is accurate, opinions that are vital, and debate that is sincere. I
hear from these people every day. “An independent press is not a liberal ideal
or a progressive ideal or a democratic ideal. It’s an American ideal,” you said
a few years ago. I couldn’t agree more. America is a great country that deserves
a great newspaper.
None of this means that some of the most talented journalists in
the world don’t still labor for this newspaper. They do, which is what makes
the illiberal environment especially heartbreaking. I will be, as ever, a
dedicated reader of their work. But I can no longer do the work that you
brought me here to do—the work that Adolph Ochs described in that famous 1896
statement: “to make of the columns of The New York Times a forum for the
consideration of all questions of public importance, and to that end to invite
intelligent discussion from all shades of opinion.”
Ochs’s idea is one of the best I’ve encountered. And I’ve always
comforted myself with the notion that the best ideas win out. But ideas cannot
win on their own. They need a voice. They need a
hearing. Above all, they must be backed by people willing to live by
them.
Sincerely,
Bari
===========
f.
“Capitalism and Social Unrest”
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=QoNNNxa_r0U
with Richard Wolff
(32:16)
+
As world sees desperate Trump torching the US, will
more of US's potential opposition recognize oncoming social disaster and join
the active opposition?
https://twitter.com/profwolff/status/1288903183348064257
+
How to Motivate Workers
with
Richard Wolff
(7:14)
+
One Nation Under House Arrest: How Do COVID-19
Mandates Impact Our Freedoms?
www.informationclearinghouse.info/55416.htm
by John W. Whitehead
+
“The coming economic crash will be like NOTHING in
history”
with Richard Wolff
(10:18)
+
The billionaire CEO says "Black Lives Matter" but
refuses to give his predominantly Black warehouse workers paid sick leave. |
From: Robert Reich [mailto:robert@imcivicaction.org]
Sent: Tuesday, July 14, 2020
Subject: Jeff Bezos’ tokenism
The billionaire CEO says "Black
Lives Matter" but refuses to give his predominantly Black warehouse workers
paid sick leave.
+ U.S. Economy Drops by 32.9% in Second Quarter, the Worst
Plunge on Record: 'Horrific' http://www.informationclearinghouse.info/55409.htm by Rachel DeSantis |
+
"Economic Update: Sports And
Capitalism"
with
Richard Wolff
===========
g.
“I Felt Like I Was Going to Die”: Civil Rights Icon John Lewis
Recalls 1965 “Bloody Sunday” in Selma
https://www.democracynow.org/2012/7/10/civil_rights_icon_rep_john_lewis
(8 :45)
&
Rep. John Lewis
on the Freedom Rides, Surviving KKK Attacks, 1963 March on Washington &
Malcolm X
https://www.democracynow.org/2020/7/20/remembering_john_lewis_civil_rights_movement
(25:50)
===========
h.
“America: The
Farewell Tour”
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ExCm6yA6jt4
with Chris Hedges
Town Hall
Seattle, Oct. 9, 2018
(1:28:32)
+
“The Great
American Reset of 2020”
with Jim Rickards and Robert Kiyosaki
===========
i.
From: Mark Crispin Miller
Sent: Sunday, July 12, 2020
Subject: [MCM] Why the WHO faked a pandemic
This piece is from ten years ago, concerning the swine flu pandemic
that wasn't. Michael Fumento, its author, describes himself as "an
attorney, author, and journalist who has been documenting epidemic
hysterias for 35 years." His other writings in that vein—including one
posted on July 9, on the hysteria today—are at:
https://www.realclearmarkets.com/authors/michael_fumento/
Having said that, I feel obliged to note that, if COVID-19 is indeed a
bioweapon, as ever more evidence suggests, and if the end-game here
is to get all the world injected with the impending witch's brew of human
DNA and Bill Gates' nanoparticles, we would be foolish to ignore the
possibility, or likelihood, that some new pathogen—a COVID-20, say—
might not be loosed upon us in the coming months. (It could be that
bubonic plague, reportedly discovered in Mongolia just last week:
https://www.cnn.com/2020/07/06/asia/china-mongolia-bubonic-plague-intl-hnk-scli-scn/index.html.)
That scenario seems all the likelier for Bill/Melinda's gleeful forecast
of "the next one," which "will get attention this time." If that moment
doesn't necessarily prove that something still more evil this way comes,
it definitely proves that those two fake humanitarians are actually a
pair of psychopaths, who ought to be indefinitely quarantined, ASAP,
for our protection:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ELP2EFVOOYc.
MCM
p.s. Lest Forbes be persuaded to take this piece down, I recommend
downloading it at once.
Feb 5, 2010,04:35pm EST
Why The WHO Faked A Pandemic
Michael FumentoSubscriber
This article is more than 10 years old.
·
·
·
The World Health Organization has suddenly gone from crying "The sky is falling!" like a cackling Chicken Little to squealing like a stuck pig. The reason: charges that the agency deliberately fomented swine flu hysteria. "The world is going through a real pandemic. The description of it as a fake is wrong and irresponsible," the agency claims on its Web site. A WHO spokesman declined to specify who or what gave this "description," but the primary accuser is hard to ignore.
The Parliamentary Assembly of the Council of Europe (PACE), a human rights watchdog, is publicly investigating the WHO's motives in declaring a pandemic. Indeed, the chairman of its influential health committee, epidemiologist Wolfgang Wodarg, has declared that the "false pandemic" is "one of the greatest medicine scandals of the century."
Even within the agency, the director of the WHO Collaborating Center for Epidemiology in Munster, Germany, Dr. Ulrich Kiel, has essentially labeled the pandemic a hoax. "We are witnessing a gigantic misallocation of resources [$18 billion so far] in terms of public health," he said.
They're right. This wasn't merely overcautiousness or simple misjudgment. The pandemic declaration and all the Klaxon-ringing since reflect sheer dishonesty motivated not by medical concerns but political ones.
Unquestionably, swine flu has proved to be vastly milder than ordinary seasonal flu. It kills at a third to a tenth the rate, according to U.S. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention estimates. Data from other countries like France and Japan indicate it's far tamer than that.
Indeed, judging by what we've seen in New Zealand and Australia (where the epidemics have ended), and by what we're seeing elsewhere in the world, we'll have considerably fewer flu deaths this season than normal. That's because swine flu muscles aside seasonal flu, acting as a sort of inoculation against the far deadlier strain.
Did the WHO have any indicators of this mildness when it declared the pandemic in June?
Absolutely, as I wrote at the time. We were then fully 11 weeks into the outbreak and swine flu had only killed 144 people worldwide--the same number who die of seasonal flu worldwide every few hours. (An estimated 250,000 to 500,000 per year by the WHO's own numbers.) The mildest pandemics of the 20th century killed at least a million people.
Click on the link for the rest: https://www.forbes.com/2010/02/05/world-health-organization-swine-flu-pandemic-opinions-contributors-michael-fumento.html#4acde16848e
+
Data suggest Florida's record-breaking coronavirus days may have been inflated by as much as 30%
===========
j.
From: Mark Crispin Miller
Sent: Monday, July 13, 2020
Subject: [MCM] There's something very wrong with Dr. Tony
"Flip-Flop" Fauci (and the ditto-heads who
stick with him, because he isn't Trump)
In March, Fauci said--correctly--that face masks offer no protection against the coronavirus. The virions are way too small for the pores in cloth and paper masks to keep them out, and the N95 can never fit your face hermetically enough to keep the virus out.
Then Fauci abruptly changed his tune, and has been singing those same wrong notes ever since, even though his current stand is groundless---and dangerous. He even wears a CLOTH mask (the MOST unhealthy kind) when on camera.
He pulled the same volte-face on the COVID-19 mortality rate, first arguing---correctly---that it would be comparable to the annual mortality rate of influenza; and then he turned around and said the opposite, and has been saying THAT ever since, even as the COVID-19 death rate has steadily declined.
So what's up with Dr. Fauci---and with all the lemmings who've consistently agreed with him, no matter what he's said? Is whatever he says right, just because he seems to be at odds with Trump?
Something's clearly very wrong with him, and them.
https://mobile.twitter.com/florianjdavid/status/1282063446037737472?s=21
===========
k.
From: Mark Crispin Miller
Sent: Monday, July
13, 2020
Subject: [MCM] NBC News spent weeks on a virologist's struggle with
COVID-19—but he never had it
More propaganda fiction from the
"respected" news outlet that, in April of 2019, ran
the tale that "spoiled brat" Julian Assange
had smeared the walls of his Ecuadorian asylum with his own
"fecal matter" (a lie that was inaudibly refuted by embassy staffers);
has repeatedly, and mawkishly, pumped out White Helmet lies as gospel truth;
pushed "Russia-gate" as fervently, and groundlessly, as Rachel Maddow did (and still does), while casting skeptics as the
dupes of foreign "Twitter bots"; has run numerous false stories
on the ineffectiveness and dangers of hydroxychloroquine; and,
lately, has been doubling down on the fantasy that Russia paid
"bounties" to the Taliban
to kill US
troops in Afghanistan.
Such is the crapola
churned out endlessly by NBC "News"—and the sort of
"journalism" that has magnified the COVID-19 threat beyond all
reason, and with such dire consequences that NBC News, NBC/Universal and the
latter's owner, Comcast, should all be tried for crimes against humanity.
MCM
https://www.nbcnews.com/news/world/why-ecuador-ended-asylum-spoiled-brat-julian-assange-n993711
NBC News
Spent Weeks Reporting On A Contributor’s Journey
Battling Coronavirus – But He Never Had It
SHELBY TALCOTTMEDIA REPORTER
July 10, 20206:06 PM ET
NBC News spent weeks documenting its
science contributor’s battle with COVID-19, but now he admits that he
never tested positive for it.
Dr. Joseph Fair, a virologist,
believed he had the virus and appeared on air numerous times to discuss his struggle
with illness in May and June. On Tuesday, Fair admitted that he tested negative
for the virus multiple times but had originally believed he had it regardless. Fair also tested negative upon taking an antibody test.
Click on the link for the rest: https://dailycaller.com/2020/07/10/nbc-news-contributor-battle-coronavirus-negative-antibodies/
+
Whitney:
Looks Like Sweden Was Right After All
https://www.zerohedge.com/political/whitney-looks-sweden-was-right-after-all
by Tyler Durden
Why is the
media so fixated on Sweden’s coronavirus policy? What
difference does it make?
Sweden
settled on a policy that they thought was both sustainable and would save as
many lives as possible. They weren’t trying to ‘show
anyone up’ or ‘prove how smart they were’. They simply took a more
traditionalist approach that avoided a full-scale lockdown. That’s all.
+
UCSF doctors
fought Covid-19 in Navajo Nation
https://www.cnbc.com/2020/07/12/ucsf-doctors-fought-covid-19-in-navajo-nation.html
+
All Roads Lead to Dark Winter
https://unlimitedhangout.com/2020/04/investigative-series/all-roads-lead-to-dark-winter/
by Whitney Webb
The leaders
of two controversial pandemic simulations that took place just months before
the Coronavirus crisis – Event 201 and Crimson
Contagion – share a common history, the 2001 biowarfare
simulation Dark Winter. Dark Winter not only predicted
the 2001 anthrax attacks, but some of its participants had clear foreknowledge
of those attacks.
+
Big Tech
Giants are Forcing Their Way into America's Public
Health System
https://www.mintpressnews.com/big-tech-giants-are-forcing-there-way-into-americas-public-health-system/269849/
by Raul Diego
A consortium
of the most powerful tech players like IBM, Microsoft and Facebook
are teaming up with hospital networks with links to the Vatican and tech
lobbying groups to shape the conversation about the future role of technology
in the public sphere.
+
Dr. Robert
Gallo on Vaccines, Plus the Democrats' Campaign Strategy
on Useful Idiots
(1:53:53)
===========
j.
Africa to Become Testing Ground for “Trust Stamp”
Vaccine Record and Payment System
https://www.mintpressnews.com/africa-trust-stamp-covid-19-vaccine-record-payment-system/269346/
by Raul Diego
A new
biometric identity platform partnered with the Gates-funded GAVI vaccine
alliance and Mastercard will launch in West Africa
and combine COVID-19 vaccinations, cashless payments, and potential law
enforcement applications.
===========
l.
Inside the
wicked saga of Jeffrey Epstein: the arrest of
Ghislaine Maxwell
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=P-9hO4wF_xw&feature=youtu.be
(27:21)
Jeffrey
Epstein was blackmailing politicians for Israel’s Mossad,
new book claims
https://www.middleeastmonitor.com/20200106-jeffrey-epstein-was-blackmailing-politicians-for-israels-mossad-new-book-claims/
+
The Maxwell
Family Business: Espionage
https://unlimitedhangout.com/2020/07/investigative-series/the-maxwell-family-business-espionage/
by Whitney Webb
Ghislaine Maxwell is hardly the only Maxwell sibling to
continue their father’s controversial work for intelligence, with other
siblings carrying the torch specifically for Robert Maxwell’s sizable role in
the PROMIS software scandal and subsequent yet related hi-tech espionage
operations.
+
NYT: “Bill
Gates Repeatedly Met With Jeffrey Epstein”
+
Bill Gates aurait été incité par Jeffrey Epstein à
faire un don au MIT, voici les liens entre les deux hommes
+
Why a Shadowy
Tech Firm With Ties to Israeli Intelligence Is Running
Doomsday Election Simulations
https://unlimitedhangout.com/2020/07/investigative-series/why-a-shadowy-tech-firm-with-ties-to-israeli-intelligence-is-running-doomsday-election-simulations/
by Whitney Webb
A shadowy tech
firm with deep ties to Israeli intelligence and newly inked contracts to
protect Pentagon computers is partnering with Lockheed Martin to gain
unprecedented access to the heart of America’s democracy.
+
How an
Israeli Spy-Linked Tech Firm Gained Access to the US Gov’t’s
Most Classified Networks
https://unlimitedhangout.com/2020/07/investigative-series/how-an-israeli-spy-linked-tech-firm-gained-access-to-the-us-govts-most-classified-networks/
by Whitney Webb
Through its
main investors, SoftBank and Lockheed Martin, Cybereason not only has ties to the Trump administration
but has its software running on some of the U.S. government’s most classified
and secretive networks.
+
How a police
spy's stunning testimony threatens the official US-Israeli AMIA bombing
narrative
https://thegrayzone.com/2020/07/26/police-spys-testimony-official-us-israeli-amia-bombing/
by Gareth Porter
Revelations
by a former police spy upend the official story blaming Iran for the 1994
bombing of a Jewish community center in Buenos Aires, and suggest a cover-up by
dirty war elements may have let the real culprits off the hook.
+
From: Moshé Machover
Sent: Friday, July 31, 2020
Subject: Fwd: POUR LA LIBÉRATION IMMÉDIATE DE MAHMOUD NAWAJAA
Begin forwarded message:
From: AURDIP <contact@aurdip.fr>
Subject: POUR LA
LIBÉRATION IMMÉDIATE DE MAHMOUD NAWAJAA
Date: 30July2020
Voir cette Infolettre dans votre navigateur
+
I'm writing
this by candlelight – Lebanon's economic crisis is a social catastrophe
https://www.theguardian.com/commentisfree/2020/jul/30/candlelight-lebanon-economic-crisis-social-catastrophe
by Naji Bakhti
===========
m.
Democratic
Candidate James Averhart Personally Oversaw Solitary
Confinement of
Chelsea Manning
https://www.mintpressnews.com/chelsea-manning-jailer-war-campaigner-james-averhart-congress-daemocrat/269235/
+
From: Of Jim O'Brien via H-PAD
Sent: Monday, July 27, 2020
Subject: Notes 7/27/20: Links to recent articles of interest
Links to Recent Articles of Interest
Links to Recent Articles of Interest
"A Brief History of Dangerous Others"
By Richard Kreitner and Rick Perlstein, NYR [New York Review of Books' Daily, posted July 27
On the long history of "outside agitators" in the US, from slavery days to today's Black Lives Matter protests. Richard Kreitner writes for The Nation and has a forthcoming history of secessionist movements in the US. Rick Perlstein has written several books on American conservatism including The Invisible Bridge: the Fall of Nixon and the Rise of Reagan (Simon & Schuster, 2014).
"How to Ruin an Empire"
By Stephen M. Walt, Foreign Policy, posted July 23
A cogent analysis of self-inflicted wounds for the US since the mid-1990s, "a train wreck of recurring blunders that has accelerated and worsened under Donald Trump," most spectacularly during the pandemic.The author teaches international affairs at Harvard University's Kennedy School of Government..
"Trump's Push to Skew the Census Builds on a Long History of Politicizing the Count"
By Paul Schor, Washington Post, posted July 23
The author teaches US history at the Universite de Paris and is the author of Counting Americans: How the U.S. Census Classified the Nation (Oxford U. Press, 2017).
"Trump Has Brought America's Dirty Wars Home"
By Stuart Schrader, The New Republic, posted July 21
"The authoritarian tactics we've exported around the world in the name of national security are now being deployed in Portland." The author teaches sociology at Johns Hopkins University and is the author of Badges Without Borders: How Global Counterinsurgency Transformed American Policing (U. of Caiifornia Press, 2019).
"Don't Tear Down the Wrong Monuments; Don't Attack Every Holiday"
By Jim Loewen, History News Network, posted July 21
A short, very readable essay on the nearly simultaneous Union victories at Gettysburg and Vicksburg on the eve of Independence Day, 1863, and how they are remembered. The author has written several best-selling books on history and American race relations.
"Shocked by Russia Supporting the Taliban? You Shouldn't Be"
By Andrew J. Bacevich, The American Conservative, posted July 15
"It requires a considerable amount of hypocrisy to profess shock at Putin taking advantage of difficulties we created for ourselves." The author is a professor emeritus of history and international relations at Boston University.
"Mask Resistance During a Pandemic Isn't New - In 1918 Many Americans Were 'Slackers'"
By J. Alexander Navarro, The Conversation, posted July 13
The author is assistant director of the Center for the History of Medicine, University of Michigan.
"Facing America's History of Racism Requires Facing the Origins of 'Race' as a Concept"
By Andrew Murray, Time, posted July 10
The author is a professor of humanities at Wesleyan University and author of The Anatomy of Blackness: Science and Slavery in the Age of Enlightenment (Johns Hopkins U. Press, 2011).
"Americans Are the Dangerous, Disease-Carrying Foreigners Now"
By Erika Lee, Washington Post, posted July 8
Historical background on US immigration policies based on fear of immigrants bringing contagious diseases. The author is director of the Immigration History Research Center at the University of Minnesota and author of America for Americans: A History of Xenophobia in the United States (Basic Books, 2019).
"In 'Russian Bounty' Story, Evidence-Free Claims from Nameless Spies Became Fact Overnight"
By Alan MacLean, FAIR (Fairness and Accuracy in Reporting), posted July 3
Critiques the mainstream press reporting of unverified claims about Russian bounties paid to the Taliban. The author is the author of Propaganda in the Information Age (Routledge, 2019).
Thanks to Rusti Eisenberg and an anonymous reader for flagging some of the above articles. Suggestions can be sent to jimobrien48@gmail.com.
+
Learning From the Past: History Provides Clues into Israel’s West Bank
Annexation
by Miko Peled
Since 1948, Israel
has annexed, occupied, taken, destroyed, built, and renamed everything from
individual homes and property to public spaces, to historic monuments. And it
has no intention, or reason, to stop.
+
The Free Speech
Fetish is American Exceptionalism on Steroids
http://www.blackagendareport.com/free-speech-fetish-american-exceptionalism-steroids
by Danny Haiphong
n.
Humor
“How Social
Distancing Rules Are Created”
with JP
(4:24)
+
From: Mark Crispin Miller
Sent: Monday, July 13, 2020
Subject: [MCM] There's something very wrong with Dr. Tony "Flip-Flop" Fauci (and the ditto-heads who stick with him, because he
isn't Trump)
In March, Fauci
said--correctly--that face masks offer no protection against the coronavirus. The virions are way
too small for the pores in cloth and paper masks to keep them out, and the N95
can never fit your face hermetically enough to keep the virus out.
Then Fauci abruptly changed
his tune, and has been singing those same wrong notes
ever since, even though his current stand is groundless---and dangerous. He
even wears a CLOTH mask (the MOST unhealthy kind) when on camera.
He pulled the same volte-face on the COVID-19
mortality rate, first arguing---correctly---that it would be comparable to the
annual mortality rate of influenza; and then he turned around and said the
opposite, and has been saying THAT ever since, even as the COVID-19 death rate
has steadily declined.
So what's up with Dr. Fauci---and
with all the lemmings who've consistently agreed with him, no matter what he's
said? Is whatever he says right, just because he seems to be at odds with
Trump?
Something's clearly very wrong with him, and them.
https://mobile.twitter.com/florianjdavid/status/1282063446037737472?s=21
+
From: Mark Crispin Miller
Sent: Wednesday, July 15, 2020
Subject: [MCM] CDC: COVID-19 deaths for week ending 6/27 were DOWN 91.9% from
mid-April peak
This means it's basically over, for all the daily
terrorism by Gates/Fauci and their media.
So how long will it take for this key datum to sink
in?
MCM
CDC: COVID-19 Deaths for Week Ending June 27 Down
91.9% From Mid-April Peak
https://www.cnsnews.com/index.php/article/national/susan-jones/cdc-covid-19-deaths-week-ending-june-27-down-919-mid-april-peak
by Susan Jones
A COVID-19 test
site volunteer wearing personal protective equipment speaks with people waiting
in line at a walk-in coronavirus test site in Los
Angeles, California on July 10, 2020. (Photo by FREDERIC J. BROWN/AFP via Getty
Images)
(CNSNews.com) -
In the week that ended on June 27, there were 1,363 deaths in the United States
involving COVID-19, which was a 91.9 percent drop from the peak of 16,895
COVID-involved deaths reported for the week that ended on April 18, according to the provisional
COVID-19 death counts published by the National Center for Health Statistics
(NCHS), which is part of the Centers for Disease Control and
Prevention.
===========
o.
Working Woman
Testifies About Reality Of Poverty In The U.S.
+
America’s
Social Hell
http://www.informationclearinghouse.info/55407.htm
by Chris Hedges
+
Stagnation of
Wages & Banking Practices
with Richard Wolff
===========
p.
Black Lives
Matter, Universalism and Hopes for the Left
with Noam Chomsky and
Susan Neiman
(1:13:34)
+
Fascist
"leaders" facilitate capitalism - the business of subordinating
people and nature to its profit-drive. Glaring example: Bolsonaro's
burning
https://twitter.com/profwolff/status/1288515377941471233
by Richard Wolff
===========
q.
From: Cat McGuire
Sent: Saturday, July 18, 2020 12:32 AM
Subject: Major new 911 report reveals 36 reporters on
the scene at ground zero heard explosions
Bravo to Graeme MacQueen,
Ted Walter, and interviewer Andy Steele!
To everyone BCC'd in this
email, I highly recommend you listen to Andy's interview with Ted and Graeme
who spent 2 years researching and writing How 36 Reporters Brought Us the Twin Towers’ Explosive
Demolition on 9/11
Or you can read the text version of their report.
Ted and
Graeme document how 36 media reporters in the early hours of the attack heard
explosions . . . and then how later in the day, the entire trajectory of the
story changed on a dime. It's as if a magic wand from on high waved away the
reporters' first-person, eye-witness, boots-on-the-ground
accounts and replaced them with a sanitized fictional version passed down from
Corporate of the Official Story of September 11, 2001.
As Graeme and
Ted wrote: The widely held belief that the Twin Towers collapsed
as a result of the airplane impacts and the resulting fires is, unbeknownst to
most people, a revisionist theory. Among individuals who witnessed the event
firsthand, the more prevalent hypothesis was that the Twin Towers had been
brought down by massive explosions.
Thank you
Graeme and Ted for this innovative, scholarly report, and for your outstanding
contribution to 911 truth. Keep up the great work! Cat
PS -- Also
highly recommended by Graeme MacQueen: The 2001 Anthrax Deception: The Case for a
Domestic Conspiracy
===========
r.
Don’t. Side. With. The.
Powerful
http://www.informationclearinghouse.info/55420.htm
by Caitlin
Johnstone
+
How Israel
obstructs COVID-19 care in East Jerusalem
https://electronicintifada.net/blogs/tamara-nassar/how-israel-obstructs-covid-19-care-east-jerusalem
by Whitney Webb
+
COVID19, The Great Reset & The New Normal
https://www.thelastamericanvagabond.com/covid19-great-reset-new-normal/
by Derrick Broza
+
Has Covid-19
Initiated the Final, Fatal Crisis of Capitalism?
http://www.blackagendareport.com/has-covid-19-initiated-final-fatal-crisis-capitalism
with Margaret Kimberley and Glen Ford
+
Lloyds
profits wiped out as bank warns about economic outlook
https://www.bbc.com/news/business-53592401
by BBC
Lloyds Banking Group has warned the
lockdown is having a greater economic shock than expected.
Britain's biggest retail bank has put
aside another £2.4bn in case more people and firms default on loans.
The provision was far higher than
analysts expected, and meant Lloyds slumped to a pre-tax loss of £602m for the
first half of the year, from a £2.9bn profit in 2019.
The bank's share price tumbled by
more than 7% on Thursday after the update.
Lloyds' has now set aside a total of
£3.8bn in the first half for bad loans, and admitted on Thursday that this
could swell to as much as £5.5bn for the full year.
It is also expects mortgage defaults
to reach £603m, compared with £30m in the first six months of last year based,
in part, on "the additional reduction in house price forecasts" for
the UK.
Commenting on the total figure for
the first half, Lloyds said: "The increased impairment charge was
primarily due to future potential losses arising from the revised economic
outlook for the UK economy as a result of the coronavirus
outbreak."
'Hard slog'
Lloyds said it had lent over £9bn to
companies through a number of government-backed schemes including the Bounce
Back Loan and Coronavirus Business Interruption Loan
schemes.
It also said it had granted more than
1.1 million payment holidays to retail customers and some 33,000 capital
repayment holidays to small businesses and corporates
"to alleviate temporary financial pressures".
·
Barclays: We want our people back in the office
·
Are Britain's banks strong enough for coronavirus?
Richard Hunter, head of markets at
Interactive Investor, said: "The current environment is proving to be a
hard slog for Lloyds, and the difficulties are unfortunately set to continue,
"Since its last update, Lloyds
estimates that the economic outlook has deteriorated further, partly because of
the immediate impact of the pandemic in its second quarter, but also due to the
likelihood of significantly higher defaults on loans in the next few months as
various government support schemes subside."
+
China urged
to develop its own international payment system to counter risk of US financial
sanctions
https://www.scmp.com/economy/china-economy/article/3095374/china-urged-develop-its-own-international-payment-system
by Frank Tang
===========
s.
15 lessons
from 15 years of BDS
https://electronicintifada.net/content/15-lessons-15-years-bds/30791
by Alys Samson Estapé
+
Wage crisis
worsens in Gaza
https://electronicintifada.net/content/wage-crisis-worsens-gaza/30771
by Fedaa al-Qedra
+
LancetGate: "Scientific Corona Lies" and Big Pharma Corruption. Hydroxychloroquine
versus Gilead's Remdesivir
by Prof Michel Chossudovsky
===========
t.
From: Mark Crispin Miller
Sent: Thursday, July 30, 2020
Subject: [MCM] GooTube has removed the entire "Highwire" channel
You can watch it at:
(2:18:56)
Del asks that we spread the word.
MCM
===========
u.
China’s Vision
in a Post-COVID World
http://www.informationclearinghouse.info/55403.htm
by Peter Koenig
+
'The pandemic
shows neoliberalism doesn't work': Interview with
Sandinista leader on 41st anniversary of Nicaragua's revolution
https://thegrayzone.com/2020/07/23/interview-carlos-fonseca-teran-sandinista-revolution-nicaragua/
with Ben Norton and Carlos
Fonseca Terán
===========
v.
“US Arrogance
is a Gas”
http://www.informationclearinghouse.info/55405.htm
by Finian Cunningham
+
The Absurdity
of American Empire
with Laura Flanders and Chris Hedges
September
2012
(18:37)
+
Watch Bill
Gates, Charlie Munger, Warren
Buffett on “the socialism versus capitalism debate”
May 2019
(9:26)